Hi guys!!! This video not audio is from a B on BitChute. Nice work yo!!! Below is a link to his channel. Enjoy!
Semper Fi
Real Neo
TheDebtAssassins
MAsonTRIX
B - 2020
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/qCWKvmDM7wMh/
#nomasksnoglovesonlylove
Here are 12 important questions and answers before considering getting vaccinated:
?"If I get vaccinated can I stop wearing a mask(s)?" Government: "NO"
?"If I get vaccinated will the restaurants, bars, schools, fitness clubs on pandemic influenza published by the US CDC found that face masks had no effect, neither as personal protective equipment nor as a source control.
- A Danish randomized controlled trial with 6000 participants, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine in November 2020, found no statistically significant effect of high-quality medical face masks against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a community setting.
- A July 2020 review by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine found that there is no evidence for the effectiveness of cloth masks against virus infection or transmission.
- A May 2020 cross-country study by the University of East Anglia (preprint) found that a mask requirement was of no benefit and could even INCREASE the risk of infection.
- An April 2020 review by two US professors in respiratory and infectious disease from the University of Illinois concluded that face masks have no effect in everyday life, neither as self-protection nor to protect third parties (so-called source control).
- An article in the New England Journal of Medicine from May 2020 came to the conclusion that cloth face masks offer little to no protection in everyday life.
- An April 2020 Cochrane review (preprint) found that face masks didn't reduce influenza-like illness (ILI) cases, neither in the general population nor in health care workers.
- An April 2020 review by the Norwich School of Medicine (preprint) found that the evidence is not sufficiently strong to support widespread use of facemasks, but supports the use of masks by particularly vulnerable individuals when in transient higher risk situations.
- A 2015 study in the British Medical Journal BMJ Open found that cloth masks were penetrated by 97% of particles and may increase infection risk by retaining moisture or repeated use.
- An August 2020 review by a German professor in virology, epidemiology and hygiene found that there is no evidence for the effectiveness of cloth face masks and that the improper daily use of masks by the public may in fact lead to an increase in infections.
Development of cases after mask mandates
In many states, coronavirus infections strongly increased after mask mandates had been introduced.
- There is increasing evidence that the SARS-2 coronavirus is transmitted, at least in indoor settings, not only by droplets but also by smaller aerosols. However, due to their large pore size and poor fit, cloth masks cannot filter out aerosols (see video analysis below): over 90% of aerosols penetrate or bypass the mask and FILL a medium-sized room within minutes.
- The WHO admitted to the BBC that its June 2020 mask policy update was due not to new evidence but political lobbying: We had been told by various sources WHO committee reviewing the evidence had not backed masks but they recommended them due to political lobbying. This point was put to WHO who did not deny. (D. Cohen, BBC Medical Corresponent).
- To date, the only randomized controlled trial (RCT) on face masks against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a community setting found no statistically significant benefit (see above). However, three major journals refused to publish this study, delaying its publication by several months.
- An analysis by the US CDC found that 85% of people infected with the new coronavirus reported wearing a mask always (70.6%) or often (14.4%). Compared to the control group of uninfected people, always wearing a mask did not reduce the risk of infection.
- Many states that introduced mandatory face masks on public transport and in shops in spring, such as Hawaii, California, Argentina, Spain, France, Japan and Israel, saw a strong INCREASE in infections from July onwards, indicating a low effectiveness of mask policies.
- In the US state of Kansas, the 90 counties without mask mandates had lower coronavirus infection rates than the 15 counties with mask mandates. To hide this fact, the Kansas health department tried to manipulate the official statistics and data presentation.
- During the notorious 1918 influenza pandemic, the use of cloth face masks among the general population was widespread and in some places mandatory, but they made no difference. [Keep in mind that the whole thing was a SCAM, as it is now. The issue was bad sanitation, vaccines, and bacterial infections due
