November 2020
Dr. Christian PERRONNE,
- doctor in infectiology,
- head of infectious deseases department at Hôpital Raymond-Poincaré in Garches, France.
- Vice-President of the WHO technical committee on vaccinations in the eurozone.
< TRANSLATION >
3’50”
Q, “Doctor Perronne, the vaccines we are confronted with, are these vaccines in the literal sense?”
A, “I’m not affiliated to the vaccine industry, nor with the antivax movement. I’ve always supported vaccines when these vaccines hare been developed in proper way, which is no longer the case today. Before we go into the matter, there is one major question we need to address first… what is the necessity to vaccinate? Because mortality has dropped to 0,05%. Never before have we seen, in medical history, the urgent and hasty development of vaccine, destined for millions or billions of recipients, in an effort to fight a virus that only attacks the weak, the pre-conditioned.”
5’00”
A, “Second point I want to make. We are drawing preconceived conclusions on the vaccine’s effectiveness. Why? Because they are meant to protect the weak and preconditioned, and yet throughout all development phases we use a young and healthy test population. We’ve observed this while developing the influenza vaccine. It works really well on the young and healthy but have a far lower effectiveness when observing the older and weak test population. We’re using extrapolated data here.”
A, “I heard my colleague, an eminent vaccine expert, say on Swiss television just now, never before, has he seen a vaccine being developed in a matter of months. Experts are all in agreement… we need years to develop a very effective vaccine…”
Q, “Perhaps this demonstrates how science has improved the years, no?”
A, “No, a test was conducted on a few hundred individuals, on the eve of its approval, and we haven’t seen the test results, it’s not been published.”
Q, “Pfizer claims the tested 30.000 individuals…”
A, “Might well be, but we’ve never seen the reports. When you’re testing on 30.000 persons in order the vaccinate millions and millions later on, there will be side effects, which will only appear later on. We are moving too fast here… If there were a real urgency, you know, with a death rate of 50%, then you weight the risk and say, ok… well, it’s the best we can do, let’s go for it, put it out there, now. But this is not the case. I repeat,… the actual death rate is 0,05%, not 50%. But hey,… we all know there is a multibillion dollar industry behind it all, but please pay attention, this is dangerous. We’ve seen the same happen when Remdesivir was launched in 2016. Soon after, we discovered it didn’t work and was toxic, yet there was huge lobby behind that product. What’s happening now, could become much worse compared to Remdesivir.”
Q, “Let’s listen to what Michèle Rivasi had to say”
7’15”
AUDIO Michèle Rivasi, “We do not know who will take responsibility for the long term side effects. The Pharma-industry said it was not going to be held responsible for any long term effect. So when for instance the French government buys the AstraZeneca vaccine, the French government will bear liability and responsibility, not the industry.”
Q, “How is it possible the European Union signs this waiver?”
A, “It’s scandalous. It was preceded by the what’s happened in the US. There also the pharma-lobby got Capitol Hill to sign a waiver. The US government will pay all indemnities in case of proven side effects. And the same here… France will pays all indemnities in case of death or long term side effects, not the industry.”
