Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.
Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.
Report Content
We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.
Thank you for submitting your report
We will investigate and take the appropriate action.
Ayn Rand on Mandatory Vaccines and Quarantines : AUDIO
Although Ayn Rand thought there is a role for government in protecting individuals from the threat of dangerous infectious disease, she also opposed government-mandated vaccinations. Listen here to find out her reasons for both.
Here is Ayn Rand's statement about mandatory vaccination and quarantines:
"Now, requiring inoculation against disease: should this be a job for the government? Most definitely not and there is a very simple answer for it. If it is medically proved that a certain inoculation is in fact practical and desirable, those who want it will take that inoculation. Now if some people do not see it that way—do not agree or don’t want to take it, only they will be in danger since all the other people will be inoculated. Those who do not go along, if they are wrong in this case, will merely catch the disease. They will not be a danger to anyone else and nobody has the right to force them to do anything for their own good against their own judgement. They will merely be ill then, but they could not infect others.
The next question in regard to quarantine is somewhat different, because in the state of, sense of a quarantine, if someone has a contagious disease, against which there is no inoculation, then the government will have the right to require quarantine. What is the principle here? It’s to protect those people who are not ill, to protect the people who, to prevent the people who are ill from passing on their illness to others. Here you are dealing with a demonstrable physical damage. Remember that in all issues of protecting someone from physical damage, before a government can properly act, there has to be a scientific, objective demonstration of an actual physical danger. If it is demonstrated, then the government can act to protect those who are not yet ill from contacting the disease, in other words to quarantine the people who are ill is not an interference with their rights, it is merely preventing them from doing physical damage to others.”
This is from a Q&A session during her lecture “America’s Persecuted Minority: Big Business” in 1963.
(An edited transcript of this is found on pp. 12-13 of Ayn Rand Answers, edited by Robert Mayhew.)
Category | Entertainment |
Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
Playing Next
Related Videos
9 hours ago
22 hours ago
Japan Fights Back Against WHO Pandemic Treaty and Deadly Shots
1 day, 1 hour ago
2 days, 2 hours ago
George Soros' ongoing plan against Christian Nations EXPOSED!
2 days, 21 hours ago
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.