The Atlantic raised some serious questions about liberty in Australia. How long can a democracy maintain emergency restrictions and still call itself a free country?
This should be a hot topic right now, given the risks to Human Rights playing out …
The Atlantic raised some serious questions about liberty in Australia. How long can a democracy maintain emergency restrictions and still call itself a free country?
This should be a hot topic right now, given the risks to Human Rights playing out right now. The ABC ran an article going over just some of the violations, which include from the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic):
- Section 10(c) states that a person must not be subjected to medical treatment without his or her full, free, and informed consent.
- Section 12 states that every person lawfully within Victoria has the right to move freely within Victoria and to enter and leave it, and has the freedom to choose where to live.
- Section 13 states that a person has the right not to have his or her privacy unlawfully or arbitrarily interfered with.
- Section 14 states that every person has the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion, and belief, and that a person must not be coerced or restrained in a way that limits his or her freedom to have or adopt a religion or belief in observance or practice.
What we are seeing play out right now, could very well change the nature of my community for many years to come. Surely its time for a frank and robust debate about what this future looks like.
Note some may find this content confronting.
🔺This episode contains material used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015)
🔺Tone's Review is made for an adult audience. Discretion is advised.
🔺Want to discover more, check out the website at - https://www.tonesreview.com/
