Good afternoon. I’m still reporting on the coup!
TrialSite News in a short period of time has become THE leading journal which reads most of the medical journals and distills out the most important findings from them. It is intended for a medical audience, but written in a style that most people with a high-school education have no trouble understanding.
They are a fair and honest in their reporting and have been on the leading edge of reporting on legitimate COVID studies, as well as the MSM fake news which has in unison downplayed any studies showing efficacy for cheap, legacy drugs in treating COVID.
In Saturday’s edition, they blasted Twitter for wiping the Twitter account of British researcher, Tess Lawrie for mentioning the forbidden word – Ivermectin. This is so good, so reasonable, that I’m just going to read it to you, without my traditional quotes pages, but from here on, this is all a quote from TrialSite News as it blasts the political and economic conspirators who have tarnished the reputation of medicine in general for generations to come.
Tess Lawrie is perhaps one of the sweetest, most intelligent, and caring people we know. She is a committed, dedicated, and passionate health professional who cares about patients, with a particular proclivity to helping the poor worldwide. An expert in developing medical evidence, she founded the UK’s Evidence Based Medicine Consultancy and has advised many prominent health agencies such as the World Health Organization.
With sorrow and some anger, we report the organization she helped launch—British Ivermectin Recommendation Development or more commonly known as the “BIRD” Group—was just eradicated from the memories of Twitter.
At this point, the line has been crossed. Social technology companies like Twitter and Facebook, which have all but monopolized communications, have turned into levers for a particular government imperative—all hinting of imminent authoritarianism.
Controlling and overcoming COVID-19 is merely the cover to a deeper, nefarious, far-reaching power grab. TrialSite’s emphasis has always been to pursue the truth in biomedical and health-related research—for the patient, the doctor, and healthcare professional involved with care or research; the investor and/or drug sponsor or whoever else needs to understand a particular investigational therapy, research center or an industry sponsor. But when a committed scientist’s work is just wiped out because a preprogrammed algorithm doesn’t like the word ivermectin, then TrialSite must publicly acknowledge that war has been declared. This is an information war, and whatever topic or subject doesn’t fit neatly into what the current administration approves is conveniently removed. When this is done at the request of the executive branch, it crosses into Constitutional violation territory.
Jen Psaki was very clear at that White House press meeting back in July that the White House assigned high-level staffers interacting with the tech companies such as Facebook and Twitter to flag what they deemed misinformation. A chilling move, Psaki should be removed immediately for orchestrating such blatant disregard of Constitutional boundaries. And who are they to declare what is true and what is not?
What law affords a few staffers in the White House the ultimate authority to direct or strongly influence near communication monopolies to allow some information to live on and other information to die? This isn’t anything close to science but the makings of a government-medical authoritarian power grab.
Ivermectin is a great drug that has saved hundreds of millions of lives thanks to the Mectizan program.
As much as we are angered with Merck’s unacceptable antics dismissing their own product because they received hundreds of millions to develop a branded antiviral targeting COVID-19, they are to be celebrated for that life-changing program—where they donate the ivermectin, known as the “Wonder drug.” The two scientists that discovered the drug just received the Nobel Prize a handful of years ago! Of course, Fact Checkers had to come and declare that this doesn’t prove its effectiveness against COVID-19—but no one claims that. TrialSite attests that we have followed ivermectin studies longer than anyone out there, interviewed more doctors and researchers, and have never declared it’s a certainty….
Sixty-five studies, [see ivmmeta.com] as of this writing, investigated the use of ivermectin targeting COVID-19. The consensus among doctors involved that we interviewed suggests that the drug is not, of course, a magical cure (there are none for COVID-19), or even a certainty, but the drug seemed to help millions of people disrupt the viral replication while somehow impacting inflammation.
There is plenty of research and real-world evidence that the drug seems to help. But a cadre of federal health authorities, academicians, and industry summarily discounted any positiv
