First published at 04:32 UTC on July 15th, 2020.
Some quick thoughts
I was discussing with a woman a heretical topic. And it occurred to me why I was hesitant to discuss it, and so I shared it with her - saying I hope the conversation is private. That is, the discussion involved the infliction of…
MORE
Some quick thoughts
I was discussing with a woman a heretical topic. And it occurred to me why I was hesitant to discuss it, and so I shared it with her - saying I hope the conversation is private. That is, the discussion involved the infliction of harm on Westernkind. I had said, perhaps it's a masculine thing, but I do not express vulnerabilities because when one complains - that is where one's enemies attack most.
This is why I see the lexicon of Going Free as essential. When one remains inside their own narrative, they are not expressing fragility or vulnerability - but disdain and esteem - rejection or repulsion. However, when I see those in the white positive sphere complaining, discussing topics like hens do, or complaining about 'liberal hypocrisy'... way too commonly... I don't see anything but an effeminate complaint - and... I have to wonder, who do they think is listening?
One should not share complaints with those who do not care to hear them, and not with those who would not sympathize. So when you announce your complaints to the world, you're only signalling to the enemy how vulnerable you are, and you are only signalling to others how cheap it is.
Going Free has two strengths: first, it converts those who did not care, into those who care (when capable). Second, it does not ever express complaints - it condemns or it supports - so your only options are that of the, so-called by Jason, "200 IQ" behavior of condemning others when wrong, and supporting when correct. This is not to say one is to never talk non-politically about anything, there's nothing doctrinaire about it in that regard - it only appears that way because of how anti-whiteism permeates Western surroundings.
LESS