"Event 201 produced results that made absolutely no sense, but it was almost a carbon copy of what we did in Canada, which is based on the rapid and continuous use of Non Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPI's).
We have pre-written plans before this pandemic bulit on the really hard lessons of the 5 previous pandemics.
The Non Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPI) discussed in the plans and advised against were exactly the interventions Canada choose to do.
What is the worst thing we did?? We destroyed our children. To have used these NPI's over and over again is criminal negligence causing death and we need to hold accountable those who did it. Our PM, our Premiers and MRH are thsoe people, and they ned to be held accountable.
If we do no immediately and vigorously remove the belief in lockdowns we will re do this, and not just for a pandemic, we will re do it over and over, and our citizens will be compliant.
You never knew what the government was going to do, you just knew it was not going to be in your best interest."
"Last October (2022) I was asked to testify in front of the Standing Committee on National Defense because the Prime Minister of Canada had asked that committee to review whether or not portions or all of the Canadian armed forces should be re-rolled for emergerncy management for disasters and emergencies in Canada.
My testimony was extremely pointed, I said the armed forces of Canada is to defend the national soverignty of our country. Period.
You already have an emergency management agency in every province and territootry in Canada, why would you re-roll the military to do it unless you have another agenda?
You know you have EMO's in every province and territory, and public safety Canada exists. Why would you re-roll the military??"
https://archive.ph/NmTFc
Excerpts, David Norman Redman, National Citizens Inquiry, Red Deer Day 2, April 27, 2023
-----------------------------------------------
Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrighted work for Educational Purposes- Not For Profit- Non-Commercial. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode)
----------------------------
Videos not loading?? See here: https://tinyurl.com/bdhbswbt
https://www.reddit.com/r/BitChute/comments/11ypiof/fix_for_videos_that_wont_load/
