Characteristics of a type of unknown Mac adresses. Variability according to different scenarios

Questions to answer:

1. Why are there some MAC addresses (X) that apart from being unknown, do not appear in the usual Bluetooth scanners (Bluetooth Scanner, Xiaomi Bluetooth Scanner, Electrosmart) but do appear in the Sniffer app and a small percentage in the "Find My Bluetooth Device" scanner ?
2. Why is it that in a Congress where only vaccinated people are allowed, there is a higher proportion of one type of these MAC X, defined by the pattern left in the Sniffer search engine ?
3. Why in a cinema hall, before the premiere of the film "The Big Reseat", the proportion of these MAC X is much lower than in a Congress only for vaccinated people ?
4. Why is it that on the shore and going into the water, where there is a lower proportion of people with mobile phones, there is a higher proportion of such MAC X addresses ?

Photo by Andrea Piacquadio

Link to link to previous work: https://www.bitchute.com/video/zG8Z2o3mYkIw/

In this study we analyzed one type of unknown mac addresses

Erratum: In the scenario table (row corresponding to movie theater) the data should be replaced by the following (from left to right): 23 (MAC with frames of 8 data clusters), 94 (MAC with frames > 8 data clusters), 19.6% (percentage of MAC with 8 clusters with respect to total unknown MAC), 7.6 (odds ratio), 44 (Chi-square), 2.4 (standard error). No change in statistical significance (P value < 0.01).

My various research papers subsequent to this one (as of today, January 8, 2023) do not demonstrate a secure association between the unknown MAC addresses noticeable in Bluetooth Scanner, Sniffer, RF connect, Find my Bluetooth Device, Light Blue, Xiaomi Bluetooth, Huawei Honor 8 Bluetooth and being inoculated with the "Covid 19 Vaccine". The reason for this is because all of these random addresses can be assigned to known devices.