Part 10: https://www.bitchute.com/video/4QjVPGboAczF/
USMC BS continues: Chowder II is so worked up over their false assertion that the Force Design 2030 is incapable of conducting combined-arms operations that they claim it “comes dangerously close” to violating the law. [67] [NO, it does] Recall that Title 10 stipulates that the marine Corps be organized, trained, and equipped to provide fleet marine forces of combined-arms. [WOKE Rocketeering is NOT combined-arms land warfare] So, the Chowderite logic goes something like this: Because Force Design 2030 offers no tanks and less cannon artillery, the marine Corps will no longer be capable of employing combined-arms. They continue: If the plan does not allow for a force capable of employing combined arms, it is ignoring the law. [BINGO!]
This is pure sophistry. [NO, the TRUTH, WORKTARD sophistry con man].
With the introduction of ubiquitous guided munitions, unmanned vehicles of all types, and cyber and electronic warfare capabilities, the fact is that the character of combined-arms is changing. Fortunately, Berger’s predecessors recognized these realities, creating the marine Corps Forces Cyber Command in 2009, when Amos was serving as assistant commandant. The command has grown under every commandant since, suggesting that senior leaders expect cyber capabilities to make powerful contributions to future combined-arms operations. And, as the Royal United Services Institute explains, “To enable kill chains at the speed of relevance, [electronic warfare] for attack, protection and direction finding is a critical element of modern combined arms operations.”[68] In the Force Design 2030 marine Corps, talented commanders will employ both traditional and new arms in novel ways to complicate enemy actions and reactions. [Typical USMC gadgetry that fails epically in war costing thousands of lives]
To recap, the evidence provided by the Chowderites for the “devastating” reduction of operational capabilities for global response is weak. [TRUE] It is based off dated visions of warfare. Their criticisms [WORKTARD's BS WOKE Rocket Korps] fail[s] to take into account strategic guidance, geography, or technology. Every reduction in legacy capabilities is generally matched by an addition of new capabilities such as long-range fires, unmanned systems, and resilient command-and-control networks. These capabilities aim to make the Force Design 2030 marine Corps more capable and lethal than [just as fucked up as] the legacy Corps.
Too Much Risk Today? Depends on Your Point of View
The concern that these changes will put marines at greater risk is closely tied to Berger’s decision to cut some legacy capabilities now to free up the resources to buy the things the Force Design 2030 marine Corps will need in the future, such as long-range precision fires, unmanned systems, resilient command and control, air and missile defense, and advanced technologies like AI. The opponents object to this “divest to invest” policy, writing, “The unnecessary and unwise reductions in needed force structure and equipment were not made to make the marine Corps more combat-ready. They were made to self-fund unproven, experimental capabilities that will not be fully operational until 2030 or beyond.”[69]
First off, the unproven, experimental capabilities that the opponents are apparently referring to are the marine littoral regiment, which is organized for stand-in operations, and the redesigned infantry battalion. It is true that new combat organizations are unproven until they are tested in combat. But that is a red herring. It didn’t stop Germany from forming Panzer units prior to World War II. Or, for that matter, the marines from reorganizing the Corps for amphibious assault operations — even after the disaster at Gallipoli. Many of the new capabilities now being adopted by the marine Corps — such as long-range precision fires and unmanned aerial systems — have been thoroughly tested and proven, several in battlefield conditions in Ukraine. Others, such as the technologies being incorporated in the redesigned infantry battalions, are now being put through their paces. None of them require technological leaps.
Continues in COMMENTS section...
