Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.
Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.
Report Content
We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.
Thank you for submitting your report
We will investigate and take the appropriate action.
1 Timothy 3:16-4:3 In The Dead Sea Scrolls Cave 7!
Book "New Testament Fragments Amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls" Paperback – January 1, 2017 https://www.amazon.com/Testament-Fragments-Amongst-Dead-Scrolls/dp/0993141587 (they are in Greek the OT in Hebrew)
Also on Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SH1lwjF0f4 and see also Mark 4:28 Found In The Dead Sea Scrolls! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKIPG3XsOzw
N.B..these fragments found in 1952 - 1956 at Qumran are not the post-2002 fragments in dispute (5 of the 16 some say all 16 of the 2002 fragments in the Green purchase for the Bible Museum in Washington are disputed and many feel they were deliberately planted in 2002 to bring disrepute on the finer papyrus of the 1946 - 1956 discoveries which have been tested as genuine. The fragments of the '7Q' cave 7 discoveries include Mark, Acts 1 Timothy, Romans, James, & 2 Peter. And see also Youtube '1 Timothy 3:16-4:3 In The Dead Sea Scrolls Cave 7!' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SH1lwjF0f4
Ezekiel and Revelations 11, 1 – 2 are linked as the same event, and Revelations 21, 15 – 19 links back to Ezekiel, yet 600 hundred pass between them as a prophecy example The destruction of the temple in 70 AD was predicted in 31 AD and fragments of scripture from before 70 AD have been discovered, dated from before 68 bc, and probably 50 ad , which means the prophecy in Mark 13, 1 – 4 is real and was accurate.(see Video on Youtube “ Dead Sea Scrolls Prove Most of New Testament Predates 68 A.D. (Don Patton)” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hwi_CGdPlE ) and previous video https://www.bitchute.com/video/JOblZsG43vlS/
The unusual – and unexpected – feature of Cave 7 (New Testament books not the Hebrew books) was that all of its fragments were in Greek, as opposed to the exclusively Hebrew and Aramaic scrolls that had been found in the other caves. Apart from two of the fragments, they were all catalogued as unidentified, and were considered indeed to be unidentifiable. That’s how things remained until 1972, when the papyrologist, Dr José O’Callaghan, thought that he would try to identify them.What he discovered concerning them was to shock the academic world – the fragments belonged to books of the New Testament. Why that should have shocked the world of academe was this. The cave and its fragments were sealed up in the year AD 68 when the Roman 10th Legion overran the area. This means that these New Testament books had been written out before that year, and were indeed copied out of earlier exemplars. It means that the New Testament had been written out and was in circulation well inside the Eyewitness Period of AD 30-70. In other words, it undermines everything - and I mean everything! - that the Bible critics have been saying for the past couple of hundred years or so. It means that the Gospels had not after all been a collection of oral traditions handed down over nigh a hundred years, growing all the while with the telling, as the critics have always claimed. It means that they were accounts that had been written out by eyewitnesses of Jesus’ ministry, and even of His resurrection. They had heard His words and had written them down. It was just too much for the critics to swallow. Chapter 1: 7Q4.1 & 7Q4.2 - 1 Timothy 3:16-4:3 Chapter 2: 7Q5 - Mark 6:52-53 Chapter 3: 7Q6.1 - Mark 4:28 Chapter 4: 7Q6.2 - Acts 27:38 Chapter 5: 7Q7 - Mark 12:17 Chapter 6: 7Q8 - James 1:23-24 Chapter 7: 7Q9 - Romans 5:11-12 Chapter 8: 7Q10 - 2 Peter 1:15 ... Chapter 12: 7Q19 - A Commentary on Romans? Chapter 13: What Happened to Cave 7? Chapter 14: Conclusion
Category | Spirituality & Faith |
Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
Playing Next
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.