"These people coming into the ER were all people anywhere from about a week to four months after receiving their 2nd injections. There are certain factors that can influence a D-dimer test that can give you a sense of a higher level than would be expected in the body. That said, the patients I was doing D-Dimer tests on did not have a level of maybe a positive 500 or 400 reading.
It was more than 3500, more than 5000 ng/ml. So those are significantly positive without any proof of having a pulmonary embolism. If I was seeing high levels of D-dimer without a definite diagnosis, I needed to ask more questions.
One study said never ignore extremely elevated D-dimer levels. They are specific for serious illness, including venous thrombosis, sepsis, and/or cancer. Even if sharply elevated D-dimer are a seemingly solitary finding, clinical suspicion of severe underlying disease should be maintained.
I started asking the question, if we are able to detect certain connections between vascular abnormalities and Covid-19, and we based our treatment on the spike protein, which includes the Pfizer and Moderna injections, shouldn't we be looking for similar side effects or complications from that same injection?
If we are mandating certain treatments, we do to need to do the due diligence to make sure what the side effects and complications especially in a time where there has not been long term studies."
Excerpt, Canadian Covid Care Alliance, October 29, 2021
-----------------------------------------------
Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrighted work for Educational Purposes- Not For Profit- Non-Commercial.
