Tiger Woods Accident - A Critical Review

Yes, I've seen accidents where entire large parts of a vehicle's body were unscathed too but there's far more damning evidence than that. No need to nitpick and cherry-pick. It's like the moon landings. All you need is ONE inescapable fact that the landings were impossible, not EVERY point raised. And THESE are what apologists debunk. They never touch the inescapable facts. So this tactic doesn't work on me. Just look at that front damage, and he walked away lol. That's a little far-fetched for one. There's a bunch of suspicious facts surrounding this accident, but don't think of those because parts of the car weren't damaged.

One bigfoot hoax doesn't debunk anything but that one hoax, yet it tricks the lessers just the same. Well time to shed being one lesser among us.

It's a TOTAL (un cherry-picked un nitpicked) hoax.

I find the whole incident far-fetched and very suspicious. Also, Tiger Woods is one suspicious character as it is. For instance his playing skills are very mysterious. When he's hot, he's hot, but when he's off, he's amateur. I've studied the guy and he's into sorcery/mind work. And again, YES OF COURSE YES, not every single point made will be 110% robust true and convincing and an i-gotcha. Stop looking for the exceptions WHEN every fact needs to be debunked first. Stop the knee jerk. Kick out the knee jerking.