First published at 22:22 UTC on April 12th, 2020.
As I’ve said in previous videos, the subversion of a group’s identity should be seen as an act of aggression and a crime against humanity. I believe the same is true of the subversion of a group’s indigeneity.
That said, of all the troubling aspec…
MORE
As I’ve said in previous videos, the subversion of a group’s identity should be seen as an act of aggression and a crime against humanity. I believe the same is true of the subversion of a group’s indigeneity.
That said, of all the troubling aspects of this multi-faceted offensive against those of European descent, perhaps the most troubling is the attempted subversion of the indigeneity of European ethnic groups.
It is imperative that we secure an existence for our people and a future for our children. That can only be done through ethnic nationalism, and perhaps the most crucial requirement for a morally legitimate return to ethnic nationalism in Europe is to ensure that our indigeneity is not subverted by our treacherous enemies.
Attempts to subvert the indigeneity of Europeans can be comprehensively refuted by simply examining the ethnohistory of non-European ethnic groups considered indigenous in various regions in the world. By identifying similar ethnohistories between non-European and European groups, we can then compare and contrast each group’s general acceptance as the indigenous peoples of their respective homelands. Then any double standards applied to Europeans are then clearly exposed as ethnocidal towards Europeans.
LESS