You are about to action:

Object being modified by the action

Do you want to proceed?

Share Video Link

https://www.bitchute.com/video/em1t-vEGsmU/

Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.

Embed Video HTML

Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.

Share to Social Media

Share to social media by clicking on the quick share links.

Report Content

Reason

Please select the most appropriate reason from the list provided.

Note: For a more detailed description of each reason, see our Community Guidelines.

Additional Comments

Please add any additonal comments that will help with the assessment of your request.

Note: Copyright claims must contain all the items specified within the Copyright Policy.

Email Submissions

We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.

Thank you for submitting your report

We will investigate and take the appropriate action.

Add to Playlist

waptek surely knew grim reaper hunter uk was going to respond butt little did he know the horror!

Next video playing soon

Click to cancel

Autoplay has been paused

Click to watch next video

First published at 08:45 UTC on April 9th, 2019.

waptek0

subscribers

Your platform for uncensored ideas. BitChute Premium.

BitChute Advertisement

I am not sure how much you have researched into this. OF course you are right to challenge the validity of her statement, that is where my concerns were. Now to answer you question, she was interviewed at her residence on the 5th October so this is 4 days after. She started work at 3 PM which is an hour before she stated she seen Paddock. So if you go back to the report from even earlier than 3 PM he was in the room in accordance to the lock report. If you check the report the next entry after the deadbolt was engaged was 6.18. So there is no chance he could of gone to the shop later than that why? Cos the door report. Now i got someone to ask her some questions two weeks ago which was reference the statement she made and that she abides by this and the answer was yes. The other question was of course the timing. She was adamant that it was around 4 PM. Now to take this further if you read the statement there are another 2 witnesses that saw SP on that Saturday we are still attempting to question them. Now you are correct the other thing that needs to be considered is the SQL database now unless we see the VAR file we will never know if indeed it was tampered with or the accuracy of the report. You know as well as i do we will never get that. So to finish I accept your counter argument however i am still investigating this activity and do not just accept your point of the validity of witness testimony happy to discuss drop me an email Wappy you surely knew i was going to respond.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsc_2Osbd8c&lc=UgwQiiqaSDgUg7Ah4p14AaABAg

my work is transformative in nature as a criticism so some usage of the original is required but uses no more of the original than is necessary & this has no negative affect on the market for the original work its self & my work is protected speech as outlined by the 1st amendment to the united states constitution & falls under fair use as outlined in united states copyright laws

http://bitchute.com/channel/w..

LESS