First published at 21:36 UTC on February 9th, 2024.
These are the exact two qualities the common man is calling out for and never seems to find in Western "leadership".
Many are going to consider the interview a fumbled chance to deal a death blow to the USA in the midst of a culture war.
T…
MORE
These are the exact two qualities the common man is calling out for and never seems to find in Western "leadership".
Many are going to consider the interview a fumbled chance to deal a death blow to the USA in the midst of a culture war.
Tucker gave him many chances to nail the West hard for failing its people.
Why not mention election fraud?
Why give a lesson on Russian history the average Westerner has little interest in?
Why not mention the LGBT agenda destroying the family?
Why so softly state the US Dollar is failing when he could have highlighted it far more poignantly?
My thought patterns are simple.
Putin's track record displays brutal competency.
"You will know them by their fruits" - Matthew 7:15-20
A man who produces results IS competent.
The idea that he "missed a chance" or "made a mistake" is brutal arrogance from a layperson.
We do not possess a fraction of the understanding of geopolitical power structures and interconnectedness that Putin does.
His track record displays absolute effectiveness, so I doubt he forgot to mention many of the things he has often mentioned to Russian state media.
He DOES say these things when speaking to Russians but he did NOT say them when speaking to the West.
He DECIDED not to.
The question is why?
WHY would Putin not want to accelerate the decimation of faith in Western institutions by its constituents?
We should all accept the following statement to be true:
He knows things we do not know.
Coupled with the track record, we can state as a matter of fact that:
Putin is competent and knows things we do not know.
https://samaritanewsletter.com/
Sign Up, get some oil
LESS