9/11 Predictive programming

Truth
Predicted 911 attacks in 1989.
https://youtu.be/QLkeUmgY1cc

1. Newton’s Third Law of Motion: “For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.”
An aluminum plane hitting a thick steel beam will have the same effect as steel beam being swung at the same speed and hitting the plane. It makes no difference which one is moving as to the effect on the plane and the beam. In both cases the thick steel beam will do damage to the plane and the beam will emerge relatively undamaged. The faster the speed at the point of impact, the more damage that will be done to the plane. Try punching a steel girder. No matter how fast your hand is traveling, you will not be able to break through it; you will eventually break your hand. It matters not if the girder is swung at your hand or you swing your hand at the girder; assuming the impact is at the same speed, the injury to your hand would be the same.

Let’s apply Newton’s Third Law to Flight 175. In the 9/11 story, Flight 175 strikes the South Tower at 450 m.p.h. Now imagine that the South Tower moved at 450 m.p.h. and struck a stationary Flight 175. We would not expect that Flight 175 would be undamaged. We would not expect that it would simply disappear into the South Tower. Any video that shows an aluminum airplane with a fibreglass nose cone gliding through a steel and concrete building violates Newton’s Laws of Motion.....
9/11 CGI proof
https://youtu.be/CdLj2X51Cqc
Continue reading
PROOF THAT NO REAL PLANES WERE USED
https://911planeshoax.com/

Nist whistleblower speaks out about 9/11 - Peter Michael Ketcham. **Links below**
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vkvCFebtCyQE/