406. . י ה ו ה AND HIS SON v. THOSE WHO HATE YAHWEH AND HIS SON, AND JEWS, AND MUSLIMS, AND FAGGOTS, AND FREEMASONS, AND MILITARIES, AND GOVERNMENTS, AND ATHEISTS, AND FALLEN ANGELS, AND ALIENS, AND POLITICAL MAGICIANS, AND, PHARMAKEIA, AN…
406. . י ה ו ה AND HIS SON v. THOSE WHO HATE YAHWEH AND HIS SON, AND JEWS, AND MUSLIMS, AND FAGGOTS, AND FREEMASONS, AND MILITARIES, AND GOVERNMENTS, AND ATHEISTS, AND FALLEN ANGELS, AND ALIENS, AND POLITICAL MAGICIANS, AND, PHARMAKEIA, AND, SORCERY, AND ‘’ THE COMPANY OF ‘’ , AND THE EGGS, AND ET. CETERA.
25 | kkQEB19PtzVc
R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., 1985 CanLII 69 (SCC), [1985] 1 SCR 295
https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1985/1985canlii69/1985canlii69.pdf
R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., 1985 CanLII 69 (SCC). [1985] 1 SCR 2951985 canlii69.pdf
Lord’s Day Act, 1906 (Can.), c. 27.
Lord’s Day Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. L‑13, s. 4.
Lord’s Day (Ontario) Act, R.S.O. 1980, c. 253.
Lord’s Day (Saskatchewan) Act, R.S.S. 1978, c. L‑34.
Date:
1985-04-24
File number:
18125
Other citations:
[1985] ACS no 17 — [1985] SCJ No 17 (QL) — 13 CRR 64 — 18 CCC (3d) 385 — 37 Alta LR (2d) 97 — 60 AR 161 — [1985] 3 WWR 481 — 18 DLR (4th) 321 — 58 NR 81
Citation:
R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., 1985 CanLII 69 (SCC), [1985] 1 SCR 295, <https://canlii.ca/t/1fv2b>, retrieved on 2023-04-18
Most recent unfavourable mention:
R. v. Stupak, 2018 ONSC 1867 (CanLII)
[…] Despite his comment in Big M Drug Mart that no one could be convicted of an unconstitutional law, and the finding that the act under which Mr. Bilodeau was convicted was unconstitutional and invalid, he upheld Mr. Bilodeau’s conviction for speeding. […] [28] Based on the above authorities, it seems clear both that the MMPR operated as a valid regulatory regime during the period of suspension, and that, despite Big M Drug Mart , individuals charged with marihuana offences during this time frame can be (subject to any argument in support of a constitutional exemption or […] Second, despite the authority of Big M Drug Mart , individuals can be prosecuted and convicted of offences found to be unconstitutional, where the declaration of invalidity has been suspended. […]
R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., [1985] 1 S.C.R. 295
Her Majesty The Queen Appellant;
and
Big M Drug Mart Ltd. Respondent;
and
The Attorney General of Canada, the Attorney General of New Brunswick and the Attorney General of Saskatchewan Interveners.
File No.: 18125.
1984: March 6, 7; 1985: April 24.
Present: Ritchie*, Dickson, Beetz, McIntyre, Chouinard, Lamer and Wilson JJ.
*Ritchie J. took no part in the judgment.
on appeal from the court of appeal for alberta
Constitutional law ‑‑ Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ‑‑ Freedom of conscience and religion ‑‑ Lord’s Day Act and Sunday observance ‑‑ Whether or not Lord’s Day Act in violation of Charter guarantee of freedom of conscience and religion ‑‑ ss. 1, 2(a), 24(1), 27, 32(1) ‑‑ Constitution Act, 1867, ss. 91, 92, 93 ‑‑ Constitution Act, 1982, s. 52(1) ‑‑ Lord’s Day Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. L‑13, s. 4.
