Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.
Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.
Report Content
We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.
Thank you for submitting your report
We will investigate and take the appropriate action.
Study PROVES HCQ WORKS For Covid-19: 'First time EVER a drug was banned by disease, not use'
Dr. Stephen Smith: Study Proves HCQ Works for Covid-19
"There was a lot of fear. Obviously there was strange political reasons that I'll never understand.
6000mg of HCQ over 10 days is NOTHING compared to what even a Lupus patient receives."
Laura Ingraham: "Tonight, are you able to use HCQ with any Covid patients that may still be coming in?"
Dr. Smith: "No, the hospital where we see patients, its a system wide thing, they banned use of HCQ in December 2020 for an indication -- meaning if you were going to use it for Covid. You can put anyone on HCQ if you thing they have Lupus-- that's fine. Even if I decided HCQ worked to treat migraines, I could use it for that too.
That was a unique ban in American medicine, where they banned a medicine by indication (to treat Covid)."
Laura Ingraham: "Could we have saved 10,000 lives?"
Dr. Smith: "No more than that man. A lot more."
Laura: '100.000??'
"Yeah, Laura, I hate to say things like that, but YES. I just try to look at the data. The study was not really just HCQ study by any means. We looked at everything, we looked at every medicine ever given, every lab value, every vital signs. We looked at prior visits to doctors, but HCQ kept coming up, and it was a cumulative dose associated with outcome, not just whether you got some HCQ as in some of the studies."
-------
Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrighted work for Educational Purposes- Not For Profit- Non-Commercial.
Category | None |
Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.