Possible Objections to my Argument for the Universe's Necessary Existence

Following on from my first video on my argument for the universe's necessary existence, here are some possible objections to my argument and answers to them.

My argument for the Universe's Necessary Existence: https://www.bitchute.com/video/CcI6c1rJRc0X/

Clarke's Argument for the Universe's Necessary Existence (Syllogistic form):

Premise 0: Any explanation must be consistent with our senses, observations, and logic if it is valid.

Premise 1: Anything that exists does so necessarily by the fact of its existence or as a derivative from some necessary existence.

Premise 2: The universe exists.

Premise 3: The universe has always existed.

Conclusion: Therefore the universe necessarily exists.

Thanks for your time and consideration. I welcome constructive criticism, of course, as ultimately we are all searching for the truth of things. Cheers.