Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.
Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.
Report Content
We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.
Thank you for submitting your report
We will investigate and take the appropriate action.
MASSIVE LIE 1: COVID 19 IS A ‘NATURAL’ VIRUS: Indisputable evidence that C19 is MAN MADE!
This video reveals distinctive 'on the record' evidence about the origins of C19! Expert – Dr L Palevsky guides us through what a virus is and is not, what it can do and what it cant. This gives a context to evaluate the damning evidence presented via Steve Hiltons investigation into the ORIGINS OF COVID 19.
Evidence is sighted from the medical industries own Bible - Research Papers. In this case NCIB. Serial numbers are uncovered that implicate Anthony Fauci in one of the biggest crimes against humanity! The 'official narrative' is that it came from an animal, transferred by 'animal to human contact'. Thanks to investigative reporter Steve Hilton we can officially label that as COVER -UP, so as to hide the REAL NATURE AND INTENT of SARS-COv2, labelled COVID 19.
BY following the money trail, about who funded 'gain of function' research we can follow it back to the organisations that approved such dangerous research. Those organisations include the U.S National Institute of Research NIH's wing - NIAID AND the University of Northern Carolina (chapel Hill) - who approved the experimental protocol, used in the Wuhan gain of function experiments. This 'GAIN OF FUNCTION' research continued for three years after Barak Obama's ban. He banned it because of the danger it posed to humanity. Why is it SO dangerous?
This video will verify that the ‘gain of function’ added to the original SARS virus, did not come from nature. SARS-COV2 is a mixture of virulent viruses from bats and a third species - making it 10-20 times more infectious than the previous SARS COV virus. To be clear the gain of function was a gain in 'infectiousness' not virulence because of the enhanced way the virus 'sticks' to human cells.
This raises the question - If its 'man made' then... how can a part. of a naturally occurring virus, be replicated for a vaccine? Answer it can't! because there is no NATURALLY occurring virus to be isolated. If they can't isolate they cant replicate to make a vaccine. They CANNOT therefore claim TO HAVE A VACCINE! BEWARE!
If MAN MADE then this 'virus' has a PURPOSE. There is then intention. Intention suggests planning with a goal. That goal depends on the funders! The Gates Foundation gave $17,951,733 to the University of Northern Carolina Chapel Hill from 2014-17 (Corrected not California) – covering the years the gain of function research was conducted. The University of Carolina(Chapel hill) gave permission and the protocol for the experiments performed at Wuhan!! That means they had predefined procedural method in the design and implementation of the Wuhan experiments. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797993/
The official narrative is that it came from an animal as the most likely the source.
Today we have verified that the ‘gain of function’ added to the original SARS virus, did not come from nature to humans.
P.S - In fact Dr Mikovits who actually isolated the HIV virus to prove that it exists, said it would take hundreds of years, of evolutionary cycles of a virus within an animal to develop the infectiousness evident in SARS - COV2.
Dr Palevsky makes the logical intentional link between, the now uncovered gain of function research, the surprise outbreak ‘announced’ by A Fauci in 2017 and the planned simulation 3 months BEFORE the real ‘COVID19’ was released.
The biggest problem 'is the medical community is not questioning the info from authorities,
The scientists are not questioning the supplied narrative…just accepting it!' says Dr Palevsky
ARE WE ALSO not going to question the authorities, who also expect us to accept it without evidence, without giving scientifically based reasons?
Category | Health & Medical |
Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
Playing Next
Related Videos
'PANDEMIC OF VACCINATED': OFFICIAL DATA CONFIRMS - Cure turns to Curse
1 year, 2 months ago
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.