"A PCR test for rhinoviruses could have created similar illusions, and governments could create these illusions now if they wanted to."
"The idea of a "pandemic" arose exclusively from new types of mass-testing without cause, the results of which fluctuated enormously and led the public to believe that there were more sick people and deaths than usual, which was not true."
"The same Mr. Drosten told our current Federal Chancellor ... that the pandemic would not even be noticed without PCR tests!"
"Corona came, influenza disappeared."
"Clinically, in terms of real illnesses and deaths, there was nothing special. It was all normal."
Professor Dr. Stefan Homburg’s Extraordinary Speech on “the pandemic”, in The German Bundestag on November 11th, 2023.
Source : https://x.com/JoshWalkos/status/1734684586725314690
+++ TRANSCRIPT : Lecture Prof. Dr. Stefan Homburg in the German Bundestag, November 11, 2023 +++
Ladies and gentlemen, we have dark years behind us. First the most important, in five key points.
First the hospital occupancy fell nationwide to an all-time low in 2020. Says the Federal Ministry of Health.
Second there were no more severe respiratory diseases than usual in 2020 and 2021. Corona came, the influenza disappeared. Say Sentinel data of the RKI.
Third died in 2020, no more people than usual. Mortality has only increased since 2021. State numbers of the Federal Statistical Office.
Fourth people who died with or on Corona were on average 83 years old, the rest of the deceased 82 years old. Say RKI and Federal Statistical Office.
Fifth cut off the mask-free and lock-down-free Sweden better than Germany. Says the WHO. So it was not because of the measures.
Summary: Clinically, there was nothing special about real diseases and deaths. Everything was normal. These are facts and that is the most important point. The idea of a „ pandemic “ resulted exclusively from new, occasionless mass tests, the results of which fluctuated enormously and pretended to the audience that there were more sick and dead than usual. Which was not true. A PCR test on rhinoviruses could have created similar illusions. And could create these illusions now if you wanted to.
How did politics react to the clinical normal situation? She closed daycare centers, schools, shops, churches and businesses for months, isolated old people and died lonely, destroyed livelihoods. The police banned reading books on a park bench, hunted young people outdoors and children in the snow, beat peaceful demonstrators. Politics excluded everyone, who asked about the meaning of the measures. She had the ZDF announced that children were virus-transmitting rats and unvaccinated people were appendixes that were not part of the people's body. A language we haven't known in 75 years.
Government power is usually limited by courts, the media, and science. This time they all failed:
Courts hardly checked the proportionality and only believed two witnesses who were subordinate to the Minister of Health, namely RKI and PEI. In this way, the government was able to certify the need for lockdowns and vaccination obligations. In addition, the courts sent doctors who followed their ethos and protected patients from physical integrity by certification. Almost every well-known measure critic was criminalized, suspended, released, arrested or subjected to a house search. Karlsruhe cynically said that the fundamental rights of citizens were not gone, but should no longer be exercised.
media read test numbers to the point of wear, without mentioning that the clinical situation was normal. They uncritically followed the PCR narrative, stylized professor. Püschel, who was the first to be a racist, Prof. Bhakdi on the anti-Semite and literally everyone who questioned the measures, on the conspiracy theorist and enemy of the state.
Specialists, especially epidemiologists and public health doctors, disappeared from the scene. It was replaced by physicists, traffic planners, microbiologists and the military, who kept the audience in suspense with new mispredictions and model calculations. For months. For years.
A review of these events should clarify three sets of questions.
First: According to the textbook, the government must calm the population at the beginning of a really dangerous pandemic in order to avoid collateral damage. Why did politics instead have a shock paper written that scared children to kill their grandparents by suffocation? Why wasn't there a single doctor on the shock paper commission, but a sociologist and German teacher? Why did politics fuel this scaremongering for years while now claiming to have made some mistakes only initially and out of ignorance?
Second: In February 2020, textbooks and WHO guidelines advised [ truncated, see full transcript at : https://tkp.at/2023/11/13/prof-dr-stefan-homburg-beim-2-corona-symposium-im-deutschen-bundestag/ (English available) ]
