SMITH PLURAL WIFE AFFIDAVITS DON'T EXIST. STILL HOODWINKED FOR 200 YEARS

NEW INFORMATION WHICH MODIFIES VIDEO. AFFIDAVITS DO EXIST BUT FORGED BY SAME SCRIBE ELIAS SMITH WHO APPEARS TO HAVE SIGNED THE WOMENS NAMES. AFFIDAVITS ARCHIVE ORG. https://archive.org/stream/AffidavitsOnCelestialMarriage/MS_3423_5-6#page/n12/mode/1up
These are not originally signed affidavits.They appear to be written ad signed by the same person. Check out how the signature and the named affiant in the body of the text are the same. These are not originally signed documents. Therefore, this explains why Elizabeth
Whitney did not remember her own affidavit because she probably was not consulted or signed the affidavit attributed to her.
interesting article about affidavits. https://thoughtsonthingsandstuff.com/raiders-of-the-lost-archives-the-jfs-affidavit-books/
I am fairly certainthese recent 2015 originals are fakes. This is the reason they are not pubished on any church website but published o archive.org. Mr. Bachman has an elaborate story of how he discovered them but his story is a classic story of how forged documents are released to the public without the organization responsible for the forgeries taking responsibility. This is the reason why Hales and others do not reference the originals direcctly but use the typewritten note cards of Bacman as their main source.

A VIEWER GAVE REFERENCE TO ACTUAL AFFIDAVITS AT THIS LINK. AFTER I REVIEW THEM, THIS VIDEO WILL BE CORRECTED. THE ACTUAL PHOTOGRAPHIC AFFIDAVITS ARE AT JOSEPH SMITH Papers THE VIEWER INDICATED BUT I HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO PULL THEM UP. FURTHER, THE VIDEO AFFIDAVITS LOOK LIKE THEY WERE BOTH WRITTEN AND SIGNED BY THE SAME PERSON, NOT SIGNED BY THE INDIVIDUAL WOMEN WHICH IS OFTEN THE CASE IN MORMON DOCUMENTS. THE ACTUAL SIGNATURE IS DONE BY THE SCRIBE AND NOT THE ACTUAL PERSON.

HERE IS ANOTHER LINK TO AFFIDAVITS. https://archive.org/details/AffidavitsOnCelestialMarriage/AffidavitBook1Typescript/page/n17/mode/2up

The video shows handwritten affidavits however they appear written and signed by the same scribe...not original signatures of the women which also is the flaw of most early documents. The scribe both wrote ad signed the document without obtaining the original signature of the purported author/signatory, Until I find these at the site and can study