Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.
Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.
Report Content
We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.
Thank you for submitting your report
We will investigate and take the appropriate action.
Lebanon 911
Final Israeli apologist smack down:
Lots of crap has been said to try to get people to believe it was not a nuke. And on the other side, in support of the nuke reality,
. If it was a nuke, the grain silo would have been completely vanished. Not so. During the Trinity tests, objects that were very solid were placed very near the blast, including a big steel ball, and on the steel ball there was still paint afterward. Lots of nearby stuff was not totally blown away. Additionally, in real life Hiroshima, sturdy structures, including a church only 700 feet from ground zero, stayed standing. That grain silo was beyond sturdy, it was very robust and had materials inside it (that are now scattered all over in front of it after they spilled out) that provided even more support. In reality, the extent of the damage to that grain silo proves it was a nuke, there was a substantial distance between it and the blast and it still got amazingly destroyed. The crater, which was 200 meters across, actually indicates a 100 kiloton blast, but I did not go into that.
1. It could not have been ammonium nitrate because when that blows up, the smoke is white. Correct answer: The smoke color from an ammonium nitrate blast is completely dependent on whatever was mixed with it to get it to explode. Additionally, if the freakishly impossible conditions are met to get it to explode without an oxidizer, you get nothing. The results are pathetic. Under those conditions (as stated in the MSM to be what happened) the smoke is white, not red. So it is partially correct, but not worth presenting. And you'd only meet those conditions with a pound or so under precise control, you'd never cause it to torch off that huge pile.
2. Here's a good one that might fool people: The cloud was water being thrown in the air, it was a harbor after all. Reality: It was not water or water vapor, it was distorted air turning opaque. water vapor would not just vanish in a second, what was actually seen was air distortions from a supersonic blast wave. And, to back that up, where is the harbor in this pic?
The photos can be seen here were i am not censored
https://www.brighteon.com/e619eab5-443e-464f-bf0c-87442c67100b
https://www.brighteon.com/4cef0fed-12d5-43af-9885-e8ba9edf6f23
This was posted when it happened yet THE MEDIA and Internet want you to believe it is something else
to support this channel and were i am not censored
link
Category | News & Politics |
Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
Playing Next
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.