John 3:5 Mockers Stumped (1917 Code, Delayed Ensoulment, “Baptism Of Desire”)

0:00 Introduction
1:22 The Laws Of The Church Are Spotless
2:02 Delayed vs. Immediate Ensoulment
2:58 Catechism Of Trent On Delayed Ensoulment
4:06 St. Alphonsus Says Delayed Ensoulment Was Held By All
4:45 The Roman Ritual On Not Baptizing Certain “Monsters”
5:35 St. Alphonsus On Not Baptizing Certain “Monsters”
7:07 Various Popes On “Non-Animated” Fetuses
8:31 The Glaring Inconsistency Of “Baptism Of Desire” Supporters
9:41 The Issue Of Ensoulment Is Connected To Faith
13:26 The 1917 Code On Baptizing “Monsters” And Ensoulment
14:13 Canonists Says The Code “Corrected” The Roman Ritual
15:30 Prestigious Commentary Contains Revealing Statement
18:42 The Roman Ritual On The Necessity Of Baptism
19:29 Pope Paul V Promulgated The Roman Ritual
21:30 Benedict XIV On Errors In Various Documents
21:58 The 1917 Code Did Not Bind All
24:16 Equivocating On The Term “Universal”
27:51 The Case Of Honorius
28:50 The Decretals Of Pope Gregory IX
29:13 An Error In The Decretals Of Gregory IX
29:51 Bellarmine On Errors In Decretals
31:13 Two Of The Most Important Early Decretals On Baptism
31:41 Bellarmine On A Pope Issuing A Bad Command
32:34 St. Francis De Sales Supports The Point
32:58 Where The 1917 Code Is Not Spotless
34:18 Profession Of Faith At The Beginning
35:54 Divine Laws Retain Their Force
37:14 The Church’s Traditional Law Excluding The Unbaptized
42:35 Conclusion

This video contains a great deal of important information relevant to understanding Church teaching on infallibility and related matters. It carefully refutes the faulty arguments and false understanding of those who deny the necessity of baptism. It also presents various relevant passages, which were previously only available in Latin, in English for the first time. This is a must-see for those who want to properly understand Church teaching and defend the one true faith without compromise in our day.

This is an important video which refutes those who attack the Catholic Church's dogmatic teaching that no one can be saved without the Catholic faith & valid water baptism. It refutes John 3:5 mockers (that is, those who arrogantly reject the words of Jesus Christ in John 3:5) who push the false idea of "baptism of desire" as if it is binding on the entire Church — it's not. It's a novelty that falls apart when held up to the most authoritative & binding rule of faith, the Magisterium (the infallible teachings of true popes).

Those who claim that "baptism of desire" is the teaching of the Church would have to hold that delayed ensoulment is also binding, when of course most of the aforementioned anti-baptism heretics don't hold that position, further proving the inconsistency & contradiction of their false theology, which is refuted by dogmatic Catholic teaching.

Credit to Most Holy Family Monastery
www.vaticancatholic.com
www.Endtimes.video
www.YouTube.com/mhfm1

John 3:5 Mockers Stumped (1917 Code, Delayed Ensoulment, "Baptism of Desire")
https://youtu.be/wEQWkfjA2cA?si=rjMfYIxljzN