Thanks to YOUTUBE genius X, Millennial 7, we now know anti-radar stealth is primarily UNDER THE AIRCRAFT'S WINGS to evade ground-based radar. Above the wing, doesn't have to be so stealthy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbmrYZGBMCg
The U.K. in WW2 flew body bags over the top of "Spitfire" wings, and after the war, SEPECAT "Jaguar" fighter-bomber and "Lightning" interceptors used overwing pylons. The Germans in WW2 had spy pods on top of "Stuka" dive bombers.
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=153745
In a trivia-type questions and answers section (page 110) of the May 2009, AOPA Pilot Magazine (www.aopa.org) is a question that should prove of interest to this section's forum participants:
"1. From reader John Schmidt: Under what circumstances might a German secret agent during World war II have found himself strapped to the wing of a dive bomber?"
[the answer at page 123]:
"The Junkers JU-87D-3 Stuka dive bomber was evaluated with a personnel pod mounted above each wing. The pods could be released during a shallow dive and be 'paradropped' to deliver secret agents behind enemy lines.
http://www.luftarchiv.de/index.htm?/bordgerate/behalter.htm
Transport container for people (agent container)
A peculiar design were the personnel drop tanks, the PAG and the PLG. Two people were to be accommodated in these, who had to be brought behind the enemy front for special purposes. The three ribbon parachutes were only deployed just above the ground, but damage occurred from time to time. This led to attempts to drop it over lakes, using an outboard motor as part of the equipment. The landing barrel was designed in a similar way, but no parachute was used here. If a landing chain touched the ground, four braking rockets should be ignited at a distance of about 25 m from the ground and make a landing possible without major damage. A "sabotage barrel" for 3 men was planned for the "Ulm" operation (the planned destruction of the weapons manufacturing centers in the Urals by sabotage groups with the support of Russian prisoners of war). But it stayed with the plans.
LuftArchiv.de
Water testing of the personnel release device (PAG) on Lake Thumsee/Bad Reichenhall
LuftArchiv.de
Construction of the Aerofoil Personal Landing Device (PLG)
LuftArchiv.de
Junkers Ju 87 D-3 Ag with PLG, the Klemm Kl 35 was also tested for this, see below, engine aircraft construction - Klemm
****
Thus, to insert/extract a 4-man Commando/Spy team from a F-35B jump jet, their GRIER 2 pods should be ON TOP of the wings as conformal like the transport pods on top of the FW-190's wings but bigger;
http://www.luftarchiv.de/bordgerate/behalt1.jpg
...form-fitting bulges that could detach as pods for paradrop or glider crash-landing so no mothership airlanding has to take place to insert. They could be INFLATOPODS or INFLATOPLANES for covertness!
www.combatreform.org/escape.htm
If the pods could fly with fold out/in wings and propulsion they could FLY UP to the F-35B (or other type) and LAND ON TOP and fly away parasitically like the wise Russians proved in WW2 combat.
www.combatreform.org/airborneaircraftcarriers.htm
If this is already too ambitious enough for defeatist nihilist-luddite losertarded minds, the GRIER 2 pods on the ground could have wheels or tracks and be GROUND MOBILITY vehicles to attack/spy/raid from strength--not just hand weapon handicap.
John 3:16
Semper Airborne!
James Bond is REAL
