https://archive.org/details/1984AudioBookPDF/1984-01.mp3

"Since about that time, war had been literally continuous, though strictly speaking it had not always been the same war. For several months during his childhood there had been confused street fighting in London itself, some of which he remembered vividly. But to trace out the history of the whole period, to say who was fighting whom at any given moment, would have been utterly impossible, since no written record, and no spoken word, ever made mention of any other alignment than the existing one. At this moment, for example, in 1984 (if it was 1984), Oceania was at war with Eurasia and in alliance with Eastasia. In no public or private utterance was it ever admitted that the three powers had at any time been grouped along different lines. Actually, as Winston well knew, it was only four years since Oceania had been at war with Eastasia and in alliance with Eurasia. But that was merely a piece of furtive knowledge which he happened to possess because his memory was not satisfactorily under control. Officially the change of partners had never happened. Oceania was at war with Eurasia: therefore Oceania had always been at war with Eurasia. The enemy of the moment always represented absolute evil, and it followed that any past or future agreement with him was impossible.

The frightening thing, he reflected for the ten thousandth time as he forced his shoulders painfully backward (with hands on hips, they were gyrating their bodies from the waist, an exercise that was supposed to be good for the back muscles)—the frightening thing was that it might all be true. If the Party could thrust its hand into the past and say of this or that event, it never happened—that, surely, was more terrifying than mere torture and death?

The Party said that Oceania had never been in alliance with Eurasia. He, Winston Smith, knew that Oceania had been in alliance with Eurasia as short a time as four years ago. But where did that knowledge exist? Only in his own consciousness, which in any case must soon be annihilated. And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed—if all records told the same tale—then the lie passed into history and became truth. ‘Who controls the past,’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.’ And yet the past, though of its nature alterable, never had been altered. Whatever was true now was true from everlasting to everlasting. It was quite simple. All that was needed was an unending series of victories over your own memory. ‘Reality control’, they called it: in Newspeak, ‘doublethink’."

"In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. And what was terrifying was not that they would kill you for thinking otherwise, but that they might be right. For, after all, how do we know that two and two make four? Or that the force of gravity works? Or that the past is unchangeable? If both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if the mind itself is controllable—what then?"

— George Orwell (1984)

US Army film MF11-9416

Facilities at the Electronic Environmental Test Facility at Fort Huachuca. Radio interference as a field army issue. US Army documentary 1962.

Public domain film from the US National Archives, slightly cropped to remove uneven edges, with the aspect ratio corrected, and mild video noise reduction applied. The soundtrack was also processed with volume normalization, noise reduction, clipping reduction, and/or equalization (the resulting sound, though not perfect, is far less noisy than the original).

http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/buy/
Dr. Judy Wood appeared on Coast2 To Coast with George Noory to discuss the evidence of what happened to seven World Trade Center buildings on 9/11 and her book, Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11.

Dr. Judy Wood earned a Ph.D. Degree from Virginia Tech and is a former professor of mechanical engineering. She has research expertise in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, deformation analysis, materials characterization and materials engineering science. Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bimaterial joints. Her research has involved testing materials, including complex-material systems, in the area of photomechanics, or the use of optical and image-analysis methods to determine physical properties of materials and measure how materials respond to forces placed on them. Her area of expertise involves interferometry in forensic science. She taught graduate and undergraduate engineering classes and has authored or co-authored over 60 peer-reviewed papers and journal publications in her areas of expertise. http://drjudywood.com

Peer-review papers from Dr. Judy Wood (available online):

Deformation Measurements of Composite Multi-Span Beam Shear Specimens by Moire Interferometry: http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA304605

Detection of Delamination Onset in a Composite Laminate Using Moiré Interferometry: http://www.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY/JOURNALS/COMPTECH/PAGES/CTR10308J.htm

Deformations and strains in a thick adherend lap joint: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19890022713

Determination of thermal strains by moiré interferometry: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02321415

Micromechanical Study of Thermal Strains near the Interface of a Bimaterial Joint by Microscopic Moiré Interferometry: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992exme.conf.1692W

Thermal Stresses in a Bimaterial Joint: An Experimental Analysis: http://appliedmechanics.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/article.aspx?articleid=1411212

Influence of Matrix Chemistry on the Short Term, Hydrothermal Aging of Vinyl Ester Matrix and Composites under Both Isothermal and Thermal Spiking Conditions : http://jcm.sagepub.com/content/33/20/1918.short

Determination of thermal strains in the neighborhood of a bimaterial interface: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06072006-124140/ (Only available to Virginia Tech staff)
_____
Dr. Wood's Request for Corrections (RFC) to NIST (March 16, 2007): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html

Dr. Wood's Appeal to the NIST's Response (August 22, 2007): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html

Subsequent Qui Tam case (October 20, 2009): http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.shtml

Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration per F.R. Civ. P59(e) and Local Rule 6.3, Sttorney Jerry V. Leaphart (July 11, 2008): www.drjudywood.com/pdf/080711_Wood_07CV3314_103.pdf

SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 1 (110-stories, 500,000 tons): Local Magnitude (ML) 2.3 -- without p-wave or s-wave

SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 2 (110-stories, 500,000 tons): Local Magnitude (ML) 2.1 -- without p-wave or s-wave

SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 7 (47-stories, 230,000 tons): Local Magnitude (ML) 0.6 -- without p-wave or s-wave

A 0.6 seismic reading can be referred to as a "microearthquake" and is of such a low magnitude that it is indiscernible from natural tectonic origins. How can a 47-story building be destroyed and leave a seismic signal that is not distinct from natural causes?

www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_WTC/WTC_LDEO_KIM.pdf
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_WTC/fact_sheet.htm

*For comparison: Seismic Impact for Seattle Kingdome Collapse (130,000 tons): Local Magnitude (ML) 2.3 -- with p-wave and s-wave

Surface waves were recorded, but no primary or secondary waves of any significance were recorded at the local seismic stations. Why?

Emergency Medical Technician Michael Ober: "I don't remember the sound of the building hitting the ground. Somebody told me that it was measured on the Richter scale, I don't know how true that is. If the building is hitting the ground that hard, how do I not remember the sound of it?" --Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11, pg 157

16 Survivors at Stairwell B:
http://www.thrnewmedia.com/adayinseptember/jonas.htm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2035963/9-11-Anniversary-Miraculous-escape-16-trapped-North-Towers-Stairwell-B.html

Tritium at WTC: https://www.llnl.gov/tid/lof/documents/pdf/240430.pdf

Magnetometer data: http://magnet.gi.alaska.edu/table_index/2001_table.html

Hurricane and Tornado Control Device, patent US20030085296 A1, by Andrew Waxmanski: https://www.google.com/patents/US20030085296 (Patent application date: Nov 2, 2001; Patent granted May 8, 2003)

Path of Hurricane Erin Data: http://www.wunderground.com/hurricane/atlantic/2001/Major-Hurricane-Erin?feature=hurricanemovie
_____

For a forensic study of what happened to seven World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001, read the book "Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11" by Dr. Judy Wood, a structural engineer with a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science and expertise in experimental stress analysis, engineering mechanics and strength of materials testing. http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/buy/

Video material courtesy of Andrew Johnson (http://checktheevidence.com):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJwh__d8jDg

Path of Hurricane Erin (2001):
http://www.wunderground.com/hurricane/atlantic/2001/Major-Hurricane-Erin?feature=hurricanemovie

"Hurricane Erin was "born" on about the 1st of September 2001, and travelled up towards NYC. Hurricane Erin was the closest to NYC on 9/11/01 and was the largest on this date (although wind speeds were greater the day before). At the top of each page, the photo of Erin has an inset, where the plume of material from the destroyed WTC can be clearly seen.... The development of the Erin is considered, and a comparison made to Hurricane Katrina, for the reason that Katrina and Erin were of comparable size (Erin was bigger, by most measures), yet we heard almost nothing of the risk Erin posed near 9/11 compared to what we heard about Katrina. Erin was also the subject of an extended study mission which united researchers from 10 universities, five NASA centers and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrationä." http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/

ARA was the primary Respondent in Dr. Wood's Request for Corrections(http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html) and subsequent Qui Tam investigation (http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.shtml). Most of their money is paid to them by the US Department of Defense by weapons contracts. ARA makes directed energy weapons and conducts psychological operations.

They were the primary investigator of what happened at Ground Zero. Who would be better to have had under oath, if indeed Dr. Wood's case had been heard. What if she was supported by the 9/11 Truth movement in 2007? We might have had justice.

Interesting video about career-advancement through this cryptic organization: http://www.ara.com/video_galleryU.htm

"ARA is one of the fastest growing technology services companies in the country. We bring together employees with diverse backgrounds and experience to enhance the creativity and innovation of the mission-critical solutions we provide."

("technology services," "mission-critical solutions" ...)

Defense Contractor Attempts To Conceal Advanced Weaponry : http://pauseandreflectnews.blogspot.com/2015/08/defense-contractor-attempts-to-conceal.html

In 2007, ARA was the primary sponsor for DEPS.org (Directed Energy Professional Society), along with companies such as Boeing, Booz Allen Hamilton, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, General Atomics - Aeronautical Systems Inc., Lockheed Martin, Leidos, MZA Associates Corporation, Nutronics, Inc., the Optical Sciences Company, Schafer Corporation, Ball Aerospace, EOIR Technologies, IPG Photonics Corporation, II-VI Optical Systems, L-3 Integrated Optical Systems, Applied Companies, Envisioneering, Inc. and Nufern.
_____
Page 43 of the RFC filed by Dr. Wood asserts that the basic integrity of NCSTAR 1 is lacking because, by its own admission, it did not investigate the actual destruction of the World Trade Center Towers. That is, NIST did not accomplish its stated goal of determining "why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed following the initial impacts of the aircraft and why and how WTC 7 collapsed."

Dr. Wood's RFC to NIST (All pages): http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html

"The focus of the investigation was on the sequence of events from the instance of aircraft impact to the initiation of collapse for each tower. For brevity in this report, this sequence is referred to as the 'probable collapse sequence,' although it does not actually include the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached and collapse became inevitable."~NCSTAR 1 (http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/)

Dr. Judy Wood has produced the only forensic study on the destructive mechanism of seven World Trade Center buildings on 9/11, contained in the book, WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? EVIDENCE OF DIRECTED FREE-ENERGY TECHNOLOGY ON 9/11, and she has filed her evidence with the federal courts in her RFC to NIST (http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html).

"The Tacoma Narrows Bridge was built in Washington during the 1930s and opened to traffic on July 1, 1940. It spanned the Puget Sound from Gig Harbor to Tacoma, which is 40 miles south of Seattle. The channel is about a mile wide where the bridge crossed the sound. Sleek and slender, it was the third longest suspension bridge in the world at the time, covering 5,959 feet.

Leon Moisseiff designed the bridge to be the most flexible ever constructed. Engineers of the time believed that the design, even though it exceeded ratios of length, depth and width that had previously been standard, was completely safe. Following the collapse, it was revealed that the engineers had not properly considered the aerodynamic forces that were in play at the location during a period of strong winds. At the time of construction, such forces were not commonly taken into consideration by engineers and designers.

On November 7, high winds buffeted the area and the bridge swayed considerably. The first failure came at about 11 a.m., when concrete dropped from the road surface. Just minutes later, a 600-foot section of the bridge broke free. By this time, the bridge was being tossed back and forth wildly. At one time, the elevation of the sidewalk on one side of the bridge was 28 feet above that of the sidewalk on the other side. Even though the bridge towers were made of strong structural carbon steel, the bridge proved no match for the violent movement, and collapsed.

Subsequent investigations and testing revealed that the bridge was vulnerable to vibrations generated by wind. When the bridge experienced strong winds from a certain direction, the frequency oscillations built up to such an extent that collapse was inevitable."
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/tacoma-narrows-bridge-collapses

Read the only existing forensic study of the destruction of seven World Trade Center buildings on 9/11, Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11 by Dr. Judy Wood, a structural engineer with a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science and expertise in experimental stress analysis, engineering mechanics and strength of materials testing. http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/buy/

The World Trade Center complex contained:
- 200,000 tons of steel
- 425,000 cubic yards of concrete
- 43,600 windows
- 12,000 miles of electric cables

(The WTC complex had its own zip code: 10048)

World Trade Center 1 & 2, each were:
- 110 floors
- 208 ft by 208 ft at base
- 500,000 tons in weight

WTC 1: 1,368 ft high (north tower)
WTC 2: 1,362 ft high (south tower)

[Sources:]

WTC statistics: http://www.infoplease.com/spot/wtc1.html
https://www.nysm.nysed.gov/wtc/about/facts.html

Concrete information: http://www.cemexusa.com/ProductsServices/ReadyMixConcreteFaq.aspx

http://wheredidthetowersgo.com
For a forensic study of what happened to seven World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001, read the book "Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11" by Dr. Judy Wood.

Watch IRREFUTABLE: Classified Free Energy Technology Revealed to the World (Part I) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyY8xmSL4UQ

Dr. Judy Wood earned a Ph.D. Degree from Virginia Tech and is a former professor of mechanical engineering. She has research expertise in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, deformation analysis, materials characterization and materials engineering science. Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bimaterial joints. Her research has involved testing materials, including complex-material systems, in the area of photomechanics, or the use of optical and image-analysis methods to determine physical properties of materials and measure how materials respond to forces placed on them. Her area of expertise involves interferometry in forensic science. She taught graduate and undergraduate engineering classes and has authored or co-authored over 60 peer-reviewed papers and journal publications in her areas of expertise. http://drjudywood.com

Source: Wolf Clan Media https://archive.org/details/911alchemyfacingreality
"A Documentary by: Wolf Clan Media. Evidence of advanced '3D Image Projection' technology on 9/11. Presenting some of the key evidence compiled by Dr. Judy Wood in her book "Where did the towers go" as well as the research of Mark Conlon, Andrew Johnson, Richard D. Hall, Conspiracy Cuber, Morgan Reynolds, John Lear and others regarding the illusion of standard Boeing passenger airplanes on 9/11/2001."

Dr. Wood's Request for Corrections (RFC) to NIST (March 16, 2007): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html

Dr. Wood's Appeal to the NIST's Response (August 22, 2007): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html

Subsequent Qui Tam case (October 20, 2009): http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.shtml

Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration per F.R. Civ. P59(e) and Local Rule 6.3, Sttorney Jerry V. Leaphart (July 11, 2008): http://www.drjudywood.com/pdf/080711_Wood_07CV3314_103.pdf

SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 1 (110-stories, 500,000 tons): Local Magnitude (ML) 2.3 -- without p-wave or s-wave

SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 2 (110-stories, 500,000 tons): Local Magnitude (ML) 2.1 -- without p-wave or s-wave

SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 7 (47-stories, 230,000 tons): Local Magnitude (ML) 0.6 -- without p-wave or s-wave

A 0.6 seismic reading can be referred to as a "microearthquake" and is of such a low magnitude that it is indiscernible from natural tectonic origins. How can a 47-story building be destroyed and leave a seismic signal that is not distinct from natural causes?

www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_WTC/WTC_LDEO_KIM.pdf
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_WTC/fact_sheet.htm

*For comparison: Seismic Impact for Seattle Kingdome Collapse (130,000 tons): Local Magnitude (ML) 2.3 -- with p-wave and s-wave

Surface waves were recorded, but no primary or secondary waves of any significance were recorded at the local seismic stations. Why?

Emergency Medical Technician Michael Ober: "I don't remember the sound of the building hitting the ground. Somebody told me that it was measured on the Richter scale, I don't know how true that is. If the building is hitting the ground that hard, how do I not remember the sound of it?" --Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11, pg 157

16 Survivors at Stairwell B:
http://www.thrnewmedia.com/adayinseptember/jonas.htm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2035963/9-11-Anniversary-Miraculous-escape-16-trapped-North-Towers-Stairwell-B.html

Tritium at WTC: https://www.llnl.gov/tid/lof/documents/pdf/240430.pdf

Magnetometer data: http://magnet.gi.alaska.edu/table_index/2001_table.html

By placing a metal alloy into an induction forge, we can see such effects as levitation [0:01], delamination [0:22], illumination [0:37] and deformation/melting [1:10].

Originally posted by EDIZIONILUCISANO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fB0GhNs2etk

Text from original video:
"This is an educational video. A bar of metal alloy is placed inside a heating coil (induction forge) which produces a magnetic field. The magnetic field keeps the bar suspended, allowing it to oppose the force of gravity. The movement of the bar is not external only, its molecules are also in motion. The movement of the molecules produces heat, which heats up the alloy. The heat is now visible: the alloy starts changing color."

At a press conference in 2003, General Richard Myers and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld get very nervous and stammer when questioned about Directed Energy Weapons:

Question: "Mr. Secretary, can I ask you a question about some of the technology that you're developing to fight the war on terrorists, specifically directed energy and high-powered microwave technology? When do you envision that you can weaponize that type of technology?"

Answer: "In the normal order of things, when you invest in research and development and begin a developmental project, you don't have any intention or expectations that one would use it. On the other hand, the real world intervenes from time to time, and you reach in there and take something out that is still in a developmental stage, and you might use it." --Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld

"Yeah, I think that's the point. And I think we have from the beginning of this conflict… I think General Franks [commander of U.S. forces in Iraq] has been very open to looking at new things, if there are new things available, and has been willing to put them into the fight, even before they've been fully wrung out… And we will continue to do that." --General Richard Myers

Source: http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam7.html#microwaving
_____
Defense Contractor Attempts To Conceal Advanced Weaponry: http://thefifthcolumnnews.com/2015/07/defense-contractor-attempts-to-conceal-advanced-weaponry-2/

Read the only existing forensic study into the destruction of seven World Trade Center buildings on 9/11 by Dr. Judy Wood, entitled Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11 (http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/buy)

"STAR WARS in Iraq" movie by Maurizio Torrealta and Sigfrido Ranucci collaboration Giuseppe Mealli images research Giuseppe Soinella with the collaboration of Alessandro Rampiella

For a forensic study of what happened to seven World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001, read the book "Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11" by Dr. Judy Wood, a structural engineer with a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science and expertise in experimental stress analysis, engineering mechanics and strength of materials testing.

Buy WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? EVIDENCE OF DIRECTED FREE-ENERGY TECHNOLOGY ON 9/11 by Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., PhD. http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/buy/

Dr. Wood's Request for Corrections (RFC) to NIST (March 16, 2007): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html

Dr. Wood's Appeal to the NIST's Response (August 22, 2007): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html

Subsequent Qui Tam case (October 20, 2009): http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.shtml

Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration per F.R. Civ. P59(e) and Local Rule 6.3, Sttorney Jerry V. Leaphart (July 11, 2008): www.drjudywood.com/pdf/080711_Wood_07CV3314_103.pdf

Dr. Judy Wood earned a Ph.D. Degree from Virginia Tech and is a former professor of mechanical engineering. She has research expertise in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, deformation analysis, materials characterization and materials engineering science. Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bimaterial joints. Her research has involved testing materials, including complex-material systems, in the area of photomechanics, or the use of optical and image-analysis methods to determine physical properties of materials and measure how materials respond to forces placed on them. Her area of expertise involves interferometry in forensic science. She taught graduate and undergraduate engineering classes and has authored or co-authored over 60 peer-reviewed papers and journal publications in her areas of expertise.

In the time since 9/11/01, she has applied her expertise in materials science, image analysis and interferometry, to a forensic study of over 40,000 images, hundreds of video clips, a large volume of witness testimony, analyses of dust samples, seismic data, and the analysis of other environmental evidence pertaining to the destruction of the World Trade Center complex. Dr. Wood has conducted a comprehensive forensic investigation of what physically happened to the World Trade Center site on 9/11. And, based on her analysis of the evidence she gathered, in 2007, she filed a federal Qui Tam case for science fraud against the contractors who contributed to the official National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) report about the destruction of the World Trade Center towers. In December of 2009, this case was filed in the US Supreme Court. To this day, Dr. Wood's investigation and body of evidence as compiled in her book is the only comprehensive forensic investigation in the public domain. WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? is not a book of poetry, yet it has some beautiful prose. It is not a novel yet it tells a complete story. It is not a photography book, yet the pictures will grab you. It is not just a text book, yet its data is empirical and it teaches critical thinking. It is not the Bible yet it will be one of the most important books you will ever read. http://drjudywood.com
_______
WHAT IS SEISMOLOGY AND WHAT ARE SEISMIC WAVES? http://www.geo.mtu.edu/UPSeis/waves.html

9/11 Photographic Evidence:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NISTpics/010913_5316.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NISTpics/Image122.jpg?t=1173082676
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NISTpics/search2.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NISTpics/Image300.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/dewpics/Image42.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/dewpics/Image276.jpg

CAN YOU CALL THIS HIGH HEAT?!

http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/dewpics/Image123.jpg
Dust: http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/dewpics/aris11.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/dewpics/911wtc6craterwestair.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/dewpics/010911_VeseyWest_911_1335.jpg

Everything You Know Is Wrong, Book One: Human Origins by Lloyd Pye: http://www.amazon.com/Everything-You-Know-Wrong-Book/dp/0595127495/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1442345253&sr=1-1&keywords=Everything+you+know+is+wrong

http://lloydpye.com/
Lloyd Pye (1946-2013) was a researcher, author, and lecturer best known for his unique insights on Intervention Theory, the theory that aliens played a part in the development of human life on Earth, and his work with an unusual 900 year old skull known as the Starchild Skull.

Lloyd Pye sadly passed away on December 9th, 2013, but he left behind him a legacy of intriguing work, which you can explore on this website.

His main areas of expertise were hominoids (pre-humans and their modern-day counterparts such as bigfoot, sasquatch, and yeti), megaliths (pyramids etc.), the origins of life on Earth, human origins, alien intervention, and the Starchild Skull.

_____
Intervention Theory challenges Creationism, Intelligent Design and Evolution, by offering a fact-based explanation of how life and humans came to be on Earth. The eBook shows that much of what mainstream science professes is wrong, often in the face of overwhelming evidence. Its revelations are astonishing, but are presented in simple terms and concepts that anyone will be able to comprehend. http://lloydpye.com/interventionebook.html

IRREFUTABLE: Classified Free Energy Technology Revealed to the World - FULL MOVIE (Episode 1-5) by Adam Dwyer http://irrefutable.tv

http://wheredidthetowersgo.com
For a forensic study of what happened to seven World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001, read the book "Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11" by Dr. Judy Wood.

Dr. Judy Wood earned a Ph.D. Degree from Virginia Tech and is a former professor of mechanical engineering. She has research expertise in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, deformation analysis, materials characterization and materials engineering science. Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bimaterial joints. Her research has involved testing materials, including complex-material systems, in the area of photomechanics, or the use of optical and image-analysis methods to determine physical properties of materials and measure how materials respond to forces placed on them. Her area of expertise involves interferometry in forensic science. She taught graduate and undergraduate engineering classes and has authored or co-authored over 60 peer-reviewed papers and journal publications in her areas of expertise. http://drjudywood.com

Peer-review papers from Dr. Judy Wood (available online):

Deformation Measurements of Composite Multi-Span Beam Shear Specimens by Moire Interferometry: http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA304605

Detection of Delamination Onset in a Composite Laminate Using Moiré Interferometry: http://www.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY/JOURNALS/COMPTECH/PAGES/CTR10308J.htm

Deformations and strains in a thick adherend lap joint: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19890022713

Determination of thermal strains by moiré interferometry: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02321415

Micromechanical Study of Thermal Strains near the Interface of a Bimaterial Joint by Microscopic Moiré Interferometry: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992exme.conf.1692W

Thermal Stresses in a Bimaterial Joint: An Experimental Analysis: http://appliedmechanics.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/article.aspx?articleid=1411212

Influence of Matrix Chemistry on the Short Term, Hydrothermal Aging of Vinyl Ester Matrix and Composites under Both Isothermal and Thermal Spiking Conditions : http://jcm.sagepub.com/content/33/20/1918.short

Determination of thermal strains in the neighborhood of a bimaterial interface: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06072006-124140/ (Only available to Virginia Tech staff)
_____
Dr. Wood's Request for Corrections (RFC) to NIST (March 16, 2007): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html

Dr. Wood's Appeal to the NIST's Response (August 22, 2007): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html

Subsequent Qui Tam case (October 20, 2009): http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.shtml

Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration per F.R. Civ. P59(e) and Local Rule 6.3, Sttorney Jerry V. Leaphart (July 11, 2008): www.drjudywood.com/pdf/080711_Wood_07CV3314_103.pdf

SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 1 (110-stories, 500,000 tons): Local Magnitude (ML) 2.3 -- without p-wave or s-wave

SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 2 (110-stories, 500,000 tons): Local Magnitude (ML) 2.1 -- without p-wave or s-wave

SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 7 (47-stories, 230,000 tons): Local Magnitude (ML) 0.6 -- without p-wave or s-wave

A 0.6 seismic reading can be referred to as a "microearthquake" and is of such a low magnitude that it is indiscernible from natural tectonic origins. How can a 47-story building be destroyed and leave a seismic signal that is not distinct from natural causes?

www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_WTC/WTC_LDEO_KIM.pdf
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_WTC/fact_sheet.htm

*For comparison: Seismic Impact for Seattle Kingdome Collapse (130,000 tons): Local Magnitude (ML) 2.3 -- with p-wave and s-wave

Surface waves were recorded, but no primary or secondary waves of any significance were recorded at the local seismic stations. Why?

Emergency Medical Technician Michael Ober: "I don't remember the sound of the building hitting the ground. Somebody told me that it was measured on the Richter scale, I don't know how true that is. If the building is hitting the ground that hard, how do I not remember the sound of it?" --Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11, pg 157

16 Survivors at Stairwell B:
http://www.thrnewmedia.com/adayinseptember/jonas.htm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2035963/9-11-Anniversary-Miraculous-escape-16-trapped-North-Towers-Stairwell-B.html

Tritium at WTC: https://www.llnl.gov/tid/lof/documents/pdf/240430.pdf

Magnetometer data: http://magnet.gi.alaska.edu/table_index/2001_table.html