Radical Agenda

There’s that phrase again. “Conspiracy Theory” has been uttered very frequently as of late, by desperate politicians, clinging to power like their lives depend on it.

We hear this often enough that I could, and soon will, address the issue of the phrase itself, devoid of the context of the moment. To connect today’s episode to the news of the day though, I’ll mention that several current events have me musing about the terminology.

Most prominent is the ongoing show trial in the United States House of Representatives, pertaining to the supposed impeachment of President Donald J. Trump. Democrats allege that Trump abused the power of his office to aid in his own reelection, and pursued a “debunked conspiracy theory” that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election.

To hear Representative Adam “Shifty” Schiff tell it, this preposterous claim is a product of Russian spies, devoid of any tether to the physical universe. To even mention this possibility is evidence of outright treason against the United States, as only one in the employ of the Kremlin would dare to speak such subversive filth.

Curiously, Schiff’s outrage over conspiracy theories seems quite narrow. No such indignation was forthcoming when Hillary Clinton alleged, sans evidence, that Tulsi Gabbard and Jill Stein were “Russian assets”. Van Jones remains a Democrat in good standing, despite signing a petition by 9/11 truthers. Schiff himself peddled “Russia collusion” for months, falsely claiming in televised interviews that he was privy to evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election. No such evidence was forthcoming, after years long investigations by the Special Counsel’s office, the House of Representatives, and the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Whatever the case, a “conspiracy theory” is just that. It is a theory, about more than one individual, conspiring to do some illicit thing. All investigations involving more than one suspect, are, by definition, conspiracy theories.

Despite the plain meaning of the language, the phrase, in common parlance, has become synonymous with falsehood. It is a common utterance in news discussions “this is not a conspiracy, this actually happened” as if the two things were mutually exclusive. The FBI has recently classified “conspiracy theory-driven domestic extremists” as a terror threat, as if they were trying to mess with such “extremists” by confirming their worst fears. Being branded a “conspiracy theorist” is mere millimeters below being branded a “racist” in today’s political discourse, and for this reason, people would sooner deny the obvious truth, than bear the cost of espousing such unpopular views.

Perhaps the most common complaint about so-called “conspiracy theories” is that they are not true, by definition. To make this assertion, the person making it must necessarily have studied every conspiracy theory, and deemed all of them to be false. Since their premise is usually that we shouldn’t even be discussing these things, I find this terribly unlikely. With the Alex Jones program airing seven days a week, and InfoWars.com pumping out articles every single day, even the most dedicated conspiracy theorist would have his hands full trying to confirm or debunk all of them. Add to this dozens if not hundreds of other conspiracy theory websites, radio shows, and podcasts, and the task of finding out about all them, much less researching them, becomes quite the chore. Someone who dismisses an entire class of information, just because they call it a “conspiracy theory” is certainly not spending nearly that much time researching all of these ideas.

Disgraced FBI lawyer Lisa Page, best known for having sex with a married co-worker, and abusing the power of her office to assist Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidential election, has recently come out of hiding. She sought to defend what remains of her name, from what she laughably sees as unfair attacks on her by the President of the United States.

The first hint that she is every bit as bad as you think she is, comes from the publication carrying the interview.

The Daily Beast, which is, in reality, little more than an Antifa blog.

Page is obviously somebody that almost any media outlet would love to speak with. She could have had a softball interview with glowing commentary from the New York Times, the Washington Post, or any other newspaper. She could have gone live on CNN or MSNBC, and been treated as a hero for her assaults on marriage, democracy, and the rule of law. She chose the Daily Beast, specifically, for their low journalistic standards, and what one might safely bet was an established agreement to ask absolutely zero difficult questions.

Instead of asking Page anything meaningful, Molly Jong-Fast spends all 3500+ words assuring the reader that this FBI lawyer could not possibly have done anything even remotely suspicious, let alone illegal. The real problem is that conspiracy theorist in the White House, and the “harassment” Page has suffered for no other reason than being a woman. It almost goes without saying, that they blamed Russia for the scandal, and adamantly denied that Ukraine could possibly have made the slightest effort to impact the 2016 election.

Speaking of Ukraine, their human resources director, Joe Biden, is traveling about Iowa on a “No Malarkey” tour. Given what we know about Joe Biden, we can be quite certain that “malarkey” would be a rather charitable term to describe whatever nonsense he is feeding Iowa caucus goers. Perhaps he’ll host a town hall meeting with MS-13 members, and introduce them as a “courageous group of Americans“.

I suppose, like Lisa Page, he figures he can get away with saying whatever he wants, thanks to a cooperative media. For a brief moment, it seemed like the Internet would loosen their stranglehold on the flow of information, but that dream came to an abrupt end when people figured out that free speech invariably results in anti-Semitism. Once the Left saw how easy it was to silence so-called “Nazis”, they obviously had to see how far they could leverage that power, and they have yet to find a limit.

Most recently, it was announced that Google and YouTube have taken down over 300 advertisements by the Trump campaign.

60 Minutes reviewed the archive to learn more about President Trump’s problematic political ads. We found that over 300 video ads were taken down by Google and YouTube, mostly over the summer, for violating company policy. But the archive doesn’t detail what policy was violated. Was it copyright violation? A lie or extreme inaccuracy? Faulty grammar? Bad punctuation? It’s unclear. The ads determined to be offending are not available to be screened. We found very little transparency in the transparency report.

CBS did not seem interested in finding out if any Democrats had similar problems. They probably just operated under the safe assumption that this was a narrowly focused enforcement of real or imagined policy violations, specifically designed to damage the Trump campaign, and posted the story as more of a celebration than as anything resembling news. This is something you might expect from CBS, but I was somewhat surprised to see that PJMedia, TownHall, and Breitbart, all similarly failed to ask this obvious question.

I decided to check for myself, and I found more or less what one would expect. Biden has had no ads removed whatsoever. Warren has had some ads removed, which usually came in spurts, indicating perhaps an effort to run the same violation multiple times before moving on, but nowhere near as many as Trump.

Even if it were done perfectly even, the impact is obvious, and no sane person doubts Google’s intent. The Democrats have the entirety of the media behind them, and do not require digital advertising in the way Trump and other Republicans do.

Google announced an update to their advertising policy last month, which limited the targeting of political advertising. Trump and the Republican Party condemned the policy change, noting the obviousness of the intent.

Twitter, as you’ve surely heard, announced that they would stop selling political ads altogether. Well, not exactly, of course. They just won’t sell ads to political campaigns, PACs, or 501(c)4 groups pursuing legislative or electoral outcomes. If Planned Parenthood wants to flood Twitter with abortion propaganda, and that propaganda links to other material on immigration, that’s perfectly fine with Jack.

Maybe that’s why Jack decided he’s going to spend much of 2020 in Africa.

It’s that time of year again. Shoppers are out chasing illusive bargains on crap they don’t need, for people they don’t like. For the privilege of being the first to empty their wallets and incur interest bearing debt, they have resorted to violence and hoax threats.

That’s not very interesting, so let’s talk about Jews, instead.

You might recall from a recent episode, how our friends at SaidTheJew.com had uncovered some observations about the impeachment sham. Specifically, the demographic overrepresentation of Jews in the process, became impossible even for the Jews themselves to ignore. The more names that get dropped, the more this pronounced this phenomenon becomes.

But, there is a reason SaidTheJew.com has their tagline set as “If we said it, they would call us Nazis”.

The Jerusalem Post proves the point with this headline “Antisemitic pastor calls Donald Trump impeachment ‘Jew coup’”

It almost goes without saying, the Pastor was quickly banned from YouTube for pointing this out.

“That’s the way the Jews work, they are deceivers, they plot, they lie, they do whatever they have to do to accomplish their political agenda,” Wiles said on what he calls the “Godcast.”

“This is a coup led by Jews to overthrow the constitutionally elected president of the United States and it’s beyond removing Donald Trump, it’s removing you and me. That’s what’s at the heart of it. … I am going to tell you, Church of Jesus Christ, you’re next. Get it through your head! They’re coming for you. There will be a purge. That’s the next thing that happens when Jews take over a country, they kill millions of Christians.”

Right now, the channel appears to be back online, but with few videos and only going back two weeks. (Update, the ban was just for one week.)

That wasn’t the only side project of ours that recently made headlines. Our friends over at BlacksHateFags.com have been diligently pointing out the real reason that Pete Booty Judge will never be president, which, as the name implies, is because Blacks Hate Fags. This wisdom made its way into the national discourse when Andy Ngo pointed out to Chelsea Clinton that “The US is one of the safest countries for trans people. The murder rate of trans victims is actually lower than that for cis population. Also, who is behind the murders? Mostly black men.”

This bit of obvious truth was too “hateful” for Twitter, and they gave him a 12 hour ban, after forcing him to remove the “hate fact” Tweet.

Here at the Outlaw Conservative, we tend to pride ourselves on rejecting the oppressive doctrines of political correctness.

This is not to say that we are heartless, however. We are not entirely unconscious of the disparities which exist between demographic groups, nor are we devoid of sympathy for the hardships that some of those disparities entail. So, as we launch this Thanksgiving Eve special episode of the show, we would first like to pause for a moment of contemplation.

Americans often get wrapped up in certain themes of this holiday. Turkey, pumpkin pie, football, doorbuster sales, and inner city single moms fighting over discounted flat screens.

But there is more to it than that, of course.

Consider how tough this day is for some Americans. Elizabeth Warren, for example. Her family was once made up entirely of noble savages who lived in harmony with the Earth. They welcomed immigrants from Europe, and taught them how to plant fish. In return for their kindness, they were nearly wiped out by interbreeding, superior technology, and infectious diseases. The ravages of uncontrolled immigration were so devastating to Warren’s tribe, that the Massachusetts Senator is now only 1/1024th Native American.

This dissolution of Native lineage and culture has been devastating in so many ways. Not only has our fashion been largely deprived the benefit of feathers, but the cost of housing has skyrocketed as we replaced cost efficient teepees, with permanent structures that require constant and costly maintenance. Peace pipes have been replaced, first by cigars, then cigarettes, and now by deadly vaping devices. Absent those peace pipes, we have been cursed with mass shootings, which would never have been possible, had we stuck to tomahawks and arrows. The replacement of wampum with Federal Reserve Notes has resulted in business cycles, inflation, and fractional reserve banking.

Smallpox blankets and firewater remind us of how devastating free trade was to the Native Americans. Lessons which, had we remembered, might have saved us from Chinese fentanyl and antifreeze toothpaste.

Perhaps it is overdue that we abandon our false narratives of this time period.

Fortunate then, perhaps, that Education Week and PBS are telling the story of public school teachers helping students to “unlearn” the “myth” of Thanksgiving.

On a recent episode of Outlaw Conservative, I remarked about how even Democrats don’t believe their own media anymore. I was somewhat black pilled about this at the time, because it does illustrate a somewhat frightening phenomenon in that, even though they know the media is lying, they don’t seem to mind all that much.

The glimmer of hope recently visited upon my inbox by Rasmussen, shows that while a troubling number of people believe America is on the brink of civil war, most of those concerned about political violence are well aware who poses the real threat to this country.

Voters see a bigger threat from President Trump’s opponents over policy issues than from his supporters if Democrats succeed in removing him from office. One-in-three still see the threat of civil war in the near future.

These polling results show a staggering disconnect between those polled and what the media says. The average Democrat seems to have figured out that the people wearing masks and setting limousines on fire, aren’t quite the flower picking hippies that the media makes them out to be. The drumfire of nonsense about “White Supremacist Terrorism” seems to have faded from their minds, despite the best efforts of propagandists to elevate this narrative.

What I find most interesting, is that the Left fears Left wing violence, not if Trump wins re-election, but rather, if Trump is removed from office by way of impeachment.

This shows a really profound understanding of how these people actually operate. Leftists are not mere hostage takers, who release the victim when they get their ransom. They escalate when they win, far more than when they lose. Their insatiable thirst for chaos and destruction, is not quenched by the waters of victory.

It would be more analogous to say that victory to them is like drinking seawater. Their throats sore from screaming, their mouths dry from marijuana and poor dental hygiene, they initially welcome that first gulp of salty refreshment, only to feel the thirst get worse by the second. They imbibe until their stomachs are full, and remain perplexed at how nothing at all seems to satisfy their discomfort and anxiety.

Rather than ditch the Brawndo and give Poland Spring a chance, they call Poland a racist country, and curse the tyranny of their own biology.

They got Chick-fil-A.

The company’s charitable foundation, recently announced that they would stop financing the Salvation Army, the Paul Anderson Youth Home, and the Fellowship of Christian Athletes. These organizations have been slammed as “anti-LGBTQP” for agreeing with 2008 Barack Obama on the definition of marriage, and Chick-fil-A hopes the move will help soften the relentless smear campaign being waged against them by the sexual deviant lobby.

Predictably, this has proved less effective than prayer.

Drew Anderson, director of campaigns for the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) said in a statement to CNN, “In addition to refraining from financially supporting anti-LGBTQ organizations, Chick-fil-A still lacks policies to ensure safe workplaces for LGBTQ employees and should unequivocally speak out against the anti-LGBTQ reputation that their brand represents”.

In case you are unfamiliar with the lingo of these people, I’ll translate. Mr. Anderson has informed the world, “We would like to thank the Chick-fil-A foundation for chumming the waters. Our piranhas were hungry for human sacrifice, and your blood has reinvigorated us. Let this be a warning to decent people everywhere. We are coming for you, and we will stop at nothing to destroy the family, the individual, and every other building block of your civilizations. As we march toward compulsory universal birth control, and the extinction of the human race, we encourage you all to lay down your arms, and submit to our demands without further resistance. We seek only your annihilation, not your suffering, and for this, you must be grateful.”

The Salvation Army got the message loud and clear. Upon news of the financial loss, they gave an interview to Out.com;

“As we’ve better understood the needs of the LGTBTQ+ community, we’ve evolved our approach,” Jolley wrote to Out. “As we build and remodel emergency shelters and transitional housing across the country, we consider ways to help LGBTQ+ individuals feel safe and cared for. We also have specific programs and resources across the country, such as a dorm in Las Vegas that is exclusive for transgender individuals, a detoxification facility in San Francisco that caters to those infected with HIV/AIDS, and our work in Baltimore to meet the needs of transgender individuals who are trafficked.”

Yes, that’s right, fine members of the gender binary. The Salvation Army has entire facilities dedicated to LGBTQP people, and has allocated resources to “helping” HIV patients and transgender prostitutes, but even they, are “anti-LGBTQP” in the eyes of the degenerate lobby.

On the bright side, it likely won’t be long before you’ll be able to get a Spicy Chicken Sandwich, lemonade, and waffle fries, on a Sunday. After your kids have finished eating, they can go play in the ball pit, while a convicted sex offender in a dress reads them a story about their cross sex hormone options. If you thank the story teller profusely enough, you might even manage to avoid your children ending up in foster care. It’s a long shot, but you can try, anyway…

There are plenty of interesting things going on in the news today, and we’ll get to talking about them on this evening’s episode of the Radical Agenda, but none of them gave me any particular inspiration to write about.

Fortunately, as regular listeners have heard me mention, I’ve done a great deal of other writing for a book I am working on. Today, I will give you a sneak preview of one of the funniest stories I’ve ever had the joy of being a part of. For some of you, this will be a fun trip down memory lane. For others, it will provide important insight as to how the Radical Agenda came to be.

Once upon a time, I thought the Left vs. Right political paradigm was stupid. A big scam to take our economic and personal liberties away, one piece at a time, in alternating fashion. I had no more use for the Right than I did for the Left, and I was solidly convinced that the abolition of the State was sure to eventually cut the short list of life’s certainties in half.

Then Leftists began getting really belligerent within the libertarian movement, and I started realize that they had to be dealt with before anything resembling a libertarian social order could even be contemplated. At first I just thought they were stupid, and could be mocked into obscurity, but with time, it became obvious that this was a larger problem than laughter would be capable of overcoming.

Today, I share with you a story from the good old days, when I still believed humor was the answer.

Our good friends at SaidTheJew.com picked up on a fun theme running through various openly Jewish publications.

If you’ve been keeping up with the Trump impeachment scam, you probably assumed Jews were behind it, just from the volume of lies and hysteria.

Then there’s the fact that the guy most prominently perpetrating the fraud, is Adam Schiff, the Jewish chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.

That is hardly the end of the list, as it turns out. Like anything terrible going on in government these days, Jewish involvement in the impeachment sham is pretty pervasive.

Spotting the Jew can be a difficult task sometimes. They often dress like goyim, especially when they are trying to trick us. They have been known to get nose jobs. They even say things like “my fellow White people” just to keep their cover.

If you “name the Jew”, somebody is probably going to call you a Nazi.

That is, unless you are a Jew. Then it’s not anti-Semitic. It’s just bragging.

It’s been an exciting three weeks in Clown World. Frightening, even.

Long time listeners will recall that I used to think people were crazy for doubting certain historical narratives. I used to think it would be impossible for so many people, to tell the same lies, for so long, and convince so many, so thoroughly. I had to rethink that theory, after I became the subject of a fake news story a couple of years ago.

Once you realize how spectacularly the news lies, it follows that news tends to eventually become history. If our history books are half as dishonest as our newspapers, then we really can’t claim to have any firm understanding of history at all.

No wonder we keep repeating it.

It will definitely be interesting to see how this plays out, going forward. We know the surveillance apparatus of the US government is quite expansive, and we can be just as certain that we don’t know every detail of it. Everyone carries a camera now. Homes and businesses have security cameras. Pictures, video, and audio can be transferred around the world in the blink of an eye. While the tech and media overlords can suppress information enough that only determined people can find it, these days they cannot really get rid of evidence nearly so easily, as they could in the mid 1900s. The news lies with such shocking consistency, that it really has to make you wonder what the history books will say about these times, but given the availability and durability of information in the current era, there is perhaps some glimmer of hope that the people of the future will be better informed about today, than we were of yesteryear.

Or maybe not.

The confidence some people seem to have in their deceptions leaves room for doubt.

In the book I am working on, the description of how I shifted from libertarianism to White Nationalism was a long, gradual process, which I cover in considerable detail.

Those of you who have been with me for a long time, will find it unsurprising that the name Adam Kokesh came up several times in telling that tale.

Adam and I ran for the United States House of Representatives at the same time in 2010. Adam’s campaign was considerably more successful than mine, in that although neither of us have ever sponsored a major piece of legislation, Adam at least made the ballot. He had obtained the coveted endorsement of Dr. Ron Paul, which was a big boost to the already substantial reputation he had built for himself, as an activist with a group called Iraq Veterans Against the War.

In the nine years since then, Adam and I have had a pretty interesting relationship. His YouTube notoriety was a large part of my inspiration for becoming a content producer. At times, the casual observer might have thought we were best friends, and at others, mortal enemies. We have taken shots at eachother in our content and on social media, then gone right back to collaborating on content together, as if none of those things had ever happened. When I thought he had earned criticism, I was not at all hesitant to provide it, and when I thought he was being attacked unfairly, I came to his defense.

Most recently, Adam and I were invited to debate one another back in January of 2017, at a live event hosted by the Rothbardian Circle in Miami. We tackled the subject of immigration, and the broader merits of diversity. Whatever one’s view of things, all seemed to agree it made for an entertaining and thought provoking exchange.

Given Adam’s Jewish ancestry, it is perhaps no surprise that we have grown more distant since I was plastered all over the news as a famous Nazi.

We have not completely lost contact, however.

I have remained subscribed to his email list, and it is one of few newsletters that I still read. Having had him in my phone’s contacts the entire time, I realized he was also my Telegram contact after I became a frequent user of that application. So, occasionally, we shoot eachother a message via that medium, when one of us comes across the other’s radar.

Adam was fresh in my mind from my work on the book, when I saw this Rasmussen Poll titled “Surprising Number Say Third-Party Presidential Vote Likely in 2020“.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 38% of Likely U.S. Voters say they are likely to vote for someone other than President Trump or the Democratic presidential nominee in next year’s election. That includes 22% who are Very Likely to do so.

Adam is currently seeking the Libertarian Party’s nomination for President of the United States in next year’s all important election. He is calling for an “orderly dissolution” of the United States Federal Government, and calls his campaign the “American Referendum”. Though I remain reluctant to endorse his candidacy, for obvious, and not so obvious reasons, I find some aspects of what he says to be quite appealing.

In the somewhat unlikely event that he were to succeed in this effort, Adam’s plan would not impose anarchy throughout the continent of North America. As I understand it, his program would, essentially, leave it to the individual state and local governments to chart their own course for the future. If California wants to have open borders and a generous welfare state, they can destroy themselves in this fashion without dragging New Hampshire down with them. If one geographic region wanted to band together as a federation of all White ethnostates, President Kokesh would not send troops to stop them. If one region wanted to adopt high tech direct democracy, and another instead chose a hereditary monarchy, neither would meet opposition from the Kokesh administration, save for perhaps some verbal or written criticism.

As a purely political matter, Trump supporters might stand to benefit from Adam obtaining the Libertarian Party’s nomination.

The conventional thinking, is that Libertarian candidates deprive Republicans of votes which would otherwise have gone their way, if not for the Libertarian’s presence on the ballot. Issues like taxes, regulation, and gun rights, are largely shared between the two parties, and since Libertarians are more concerned with ideas than political power, they can afford to take firmer positions on such issues than their Republican counterparts. This makes Libertarians an appealing “protest vote” for hard line single issue voters of the Right.

We are fortunate to live in times when conventional thinking does a poor job of predicting the future, however.

Firstly, one doubts many prior Trump supporters would defect to support Adam.

The nationalist fervor stirred by Trump, hardly leaves GOP voters anxious to break up the Union. While many Republicans might cons

Newsweek used to be a semi-respectable publication, but Leftist parasitism did to them what it does to all institutions foolish enough, not to keep communists at bay.

Like every Leftist cause, women are exploited to evil aims.

Fresh out of jail in December of 2017

Wherever you see degenerate sexual nonsense, a Jew is never far behind.

Christopher Cantwell rings in the New Year, less than a month after his release from the Albemarle Charlottesville Regional Jail.

If you’ve been listening to the Radical Agenda or Outlaw Conservative podcasts, you have likely heard by now that I have been planning to take a few weeks off from the live shows. There are a number of reasons for this, some of which I can tell you about, and some of which I cannot. Those of you who have been with me through other moments when I needed some time off, have noted that when I came back from such breaks, I’ve come back stronger than ever.

I assure you, this will be no exception.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently gave a talk at Georgetown University, supposedly reiterating his dedication to freedom of expression, in a world careening toward illiberal constraints on thought, word, and deed. The speech came on the heels of widespread hysteria over his meeting with such controversial figures on the Right as Tucker Carlson, and Byron York.

After seemingly discovering the obvious truth that censorious Left wing fanatics can never be satisfied, Zuckerberg now appears to be attempting to bring his company back from the brink of uselessness, by seeking some limits on the push to silence everyone the outrage mob sets their sights on. Presumably with some concern for the backlash which will ensue after a Republican landslide in 2020, Zuckerberg drew the line at deplatforming the President of the United States.

Simultaneously, he doubled down on his dedication to stamping out so called “hate speech” and “terrorist propaganda” and eliminating “foreign interference” in American elections, which to the careful observer, means only that the catastrophic policies of recent years will continue unabated. Politicians can lie on his platform, favored causes can break the laws of their jurisdictions, violence against disfavored groups can be promoted, but private citizens who speak out of turn, or who utter truths which inconvenience the egalitarian narrative, will continue to be suppressed for as long as governments permit such manipulation of the National conversation.

One need not be a statistician to see the foolishness of this.

Last night, a dozen Democrats did their best impressions of CNN opinion hosts, competing for the chance to lose next year’s presidential election to Donald Trump. I watched every minute of the entire spectacle, and under normal circumstances, would consider it my professional obligation to provide some post debate analysis on today’s episode.

Today’s Democrat Party, however, does not warrant much in the way of analysis. The strategy being deployed has nothing to do with actual policy, and has instead dwindled to what may as well have been grunts and clicks, designed to appeal only to unthinking emotional responses. This exercise in non-reality will be the politics of our future, if immigration is not slowed, and American birthrates are not increased, but the Democrats have, much to their detriment, jumped the gun. The collective IQ of the Nation has not yet dropped so far as to warrant this sort of campaigning, and as a result, Donald Trump is all but guaranteed victory in 2020.

The smart people have already figured this out. Mark Zuckerberg, however countless his flaws, is a smart person.

Seeing the writing on the wall, Zuckerberg has been confidentially meeting with conservative personalities, including Tucker Carlson. This revelation has driven Leftists absolutely insane, resulting in, amongst other things, the hashtag #DeleteFacebook recently trending on Twitter.

Little is known about the contents of their talks, but one imagines it has a great deal to do with Left wing bias in the platform’s staffing and content moderation policies. Republicans have been pointing out that the immunity provisions of the Communications Decency Act, only exempt neutral platforms from lawsuits over content. If Facebook and other social media companies are going to be in the business of content moderation, this in fact makes them publishers, who thus ought to be held legally responsible for the content on their platforms. Seeing the law applied in this way would either put Facebook out of business, or cause them to dramatically alter the way they do business, in the blink of an eye.

It has become obvious that the Trump administration will do nothing to rectify this situation before next year’s election, and so far it has seemed that the search and social media platforms have placed all their eggs in the singular basket, of aiding a Democrat victory in 2020. This path is fraught with perils, for a number of reasons.

The Leftist media is in hysterics over a YouTube video in which Donald Trump’s head is superimposed on a character from a fight scene in a movie. In it, Donald Trump walks into “The Church of Fake News,” wherein all the churchgoers have the logos of media organizations, or the faces of his political enemies, superimposed on them. As per their pattern and practice, the fake news enemies of the people, and their subversive Democrat allies, attempt to kill the President. Unfortunately for these assassins, the President happens to be in possession of a pistol, and superhuman combat abilities, which he uses to lay waste to the whole lot of them.

The Press, suddenly aware of the serious impacts media can have on people’s behavior, are now in full panic mode, concerned this will somehow cause people to go out and murder reporters.

The informed observer has to suspect that this is the voice of a guilty conscience speaking. The traitorous Press has been glorifying the violence of Black Lives Matter and Antifa since prior to the President’s election. They have been hammering home the demonstrably false narrative that Trump is guilty of treason by adhering to foreign foes, which would necessarily subject him to the death penalty. They parade sham psychiatrists around, depicting the President as a “Mad King,” whose assassin would be smiled upon by history. They dedicate inordinate amounts of page space and airtime to mass murderers, gleefully dancing on the yet to be dug graves of the still warm bodies of the victims, celebrating their propaganda victory, and providing incentive to future killers in search of precisely this kind of notoriety.

No wonder the media is so concerned about images depicting their deaths. They know all too well what their intent is, when they promote violence across their mediums. They want Republicans to be assaulted and afraid to show their faces. They want the President to be assassinated, and incapable of leading the country. So they promote exactly that sort of thing across their pages, airwaves, and websites, and they’ve gotten everything but the President’s funeral as a return on their investment.

For the Right to respond in kind, terrifies them, precisely because they know how effective this sort of thing can be. They encouraged violence, they got it, and so they promoted more violence, and watched in glee as the violence escalated unchecked. They do not want to live in a world, where they are actually under the kind of threats they constantly pretend they are under. They fear if these sorts of things continue to proliferate, that the next mass shooter might kill somebody who actually deserves it, and they know full well that they would rank very high on that sort of hit list.

I am usually the first to say that people who act in wicked ways ought not be rewarded with political success.

This is an important lesson our country has yet to learn about the Antifa and Black Lives Matter criminality, which has plagued our streets for several years. The repercussions of this failure will be with us for decades to come, even if we were to correct course right this minute. When violence and deception are rewarded with something so valuable as political power, one cannot be surprised if violence and deception become regular features of our existence.

Unfortunately, it is precisely that failure which has resulted in another sort of violence, far less favored by the media. White racial terrorism used to be a Left wing myth, evidence of which had to be fabricated in the form of fake hate crimes. Today it has become an all too real subject of our political discourse, brought to the forefront of our National conversation by a curious alignment of priorities, between the perpetrators of this violence, and its purported targets.

Stephan Balliet spent substantial time and effort on manufacturing improvised firearms and explosive devices, before carrying out his attempted attack on a synagogue in Halle, Germany. He left behind a manifesto of sorts, detailing more his methods than his motives, but is reported to have confessed his intent to police, and also streamed video of the assault, in which he blamed Jews for all too real problems facing his country, and ours.

He is not the first to do this, obviously. Before him came Patrick Crusius, Brenton Tarrant, Robert Bowers, and Dylann Roof, to name just a few. This list is likely to grow longer, perhaps long enough for us to begin forgetting the names, because of our society’s stubborn refusal to grapple with the root causes of these crimes, and worse, a morbid drive to double down on precisely the misguided and malicious patterns which preceded, and, arguably, necessitated them.

Normally when people resort to political violence, we rightly critique the methods of the criminal. Whatever one’s cause, no matter how righteous, violence, we insist, is never the answer. We live in democratic societies, where avenues are purportedly provided for political and social change, which do not necessitate bloodshed, thereby depriving such acts of justification. We purport to embrace free speech, respect the rights of individuals, and protect minorities from persecution at the hands of the Mob.

Had we continued to honor these time tested traditions, it would be difficult indeed to find a soul on this Earth who would watch the gruesome videos of these attacks, and find them inspiring. Their so-called “manifestos” would be dismissed by all, just as they are currently dismissed today by the majority, as the senseless rantings of deranged criminals. We would find them no more worthy of consideration, than we would the lyrics of gangster rap, or “death metal”.

Sadly, we have not honored these traditions. Some ideas, even some rather substantial facts, have been deemed too dangerous to be discussed openly, by our ruling classes. Their frantic and futile efforts to hide the truth, and suppress dissent, have resulted in precisely the outcome they purport to be trying to prevent. With each such outcome, these censorious efforts are increased, and coupled with ever louder calls to disarm the broader law abiding populace.

The inability to peacefully address legitimate grievances, combined with the drive for disarmament, create a wholly justified sense of dread, and urgency, amongst the growing numbers of people who understand these truths our rulers try so hard to suppress. Seeing in their futures a world where degeneracy, brutality, and chaos, prevail over the forces of decency, law, and order, otherwise good men reach the conclusion that cowardice alone prevents men from taking up arms against these threats to civilization.

People who reach these conclusions are further troubled by the observation that no leader has emerged to guide them toward victory. Anyone who emerges with the potential for that leadership, is rapidly set upon by the powers that be. They are assaulted, silenced, and sucked into costly legal battles which incapacitate them for years at a time.

Simultaneously, they see innocent men imprisoned, bankrupted, slandered, and worse. With time and repetition, the message becomes clear. Innocence is no defense against this threat, and thus remaining innocent has no benefit.

In a rapidly growing number of minds, these circumstances, taken together, spell out a clear choice. Either fight now, and hope that others follow suit, or cower slavishly, secure in the knowledge that far worse evils will result.

To attack the motives of such men, only proves their point. To try and silence these views, only confirms the suspicion. To disarm the populace, only increases the urgency.


Last Friday, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Kevin McAleenan announced his department’s “Strategic Framework for Combating Terrorism and Targeted Violence“. From the title, this would seem an appropriate venture for an arm of the Federal Government, tasked with securing the homeland. Stopping terrorism and other forms of criminal violence are amongst the primary functions of any government, and thus publishing a strategic framework for combating these things ought raise not an eyebrow.

This framework however, did raise a few eyebrows. More than a few.

It was curiously celebrated by the Left wing media, which is profoundly odd, considering their contempt for securing the Nation more generally. They opposed restricting the entry of migrants from countries known for sponsoring terrorism, even migrants from countries the United States is presently at war with. They oppose securing our borders, and enforcing our immigration laws. They support the disenfranchisement and wholesale replacement of the people of this country. They have openly praised violent communist agitators who attack permitted demonstrations, while seemingly failing to notice even more reprehensible Left wing terrorism. They supported the FBI’s attempted overthrow of our duly elected President. They seek to disarm and silence our citizenry, abolish our constitution, and institute in its place a wholly anti-American global order, which subordinates us to other Nations & Peoples.

Just as curiously, some of the most patriotic people in the country were terrified of the news. They feared they might be targeted by their own government. This fear was granted substantial weight by an abundance of evidence of this happening, provided well before the official announcement. Headline after headline has emerged of supposed “White Supremacists” being arrested on charges ranging from a malicious disregard for their claims of self defense, to drugs and weapons, to stretched interpretations of “threats” supposedly uttered on the Internet.

Of particular note were the framework’s focus on “White Supremacy” and seeming lack of concern for violent communist groups like Antifa.

“Skip School & Organize A Climate Strike” reads the website of a religious extremist group. The gods are angry with mankind Personkind, for his their sinful industriousness has given rise to inequality between peoples. For giving this offense to the Climate Goddesses, we are condemned to live in a world in which weather conditions change in perpetuity.

It sounds ominous, I know, but fear not, fellow creature. No matter which of the infinite genders you identify as, there is hope for our collective salvation. If we only make the proper sacrifices, ill-defined though they may be, we can live in a veritable monoclimatic paradise, in which no man, woman, non-binary, nor two-spirit, need purchase clothing for more than a single season.

The path to uniclimatism is long and arduous, but this is the test of our faith which the Goddesses of temperature, precipitation, and breeze, have set for us, and we must meet it, lest we be cursed with this sin for eternity.

Our redemption begins with a global strike, to be led by those who are paid for the service.

The children who have committed the sin of being born, must flee their classrooms studies and bathe their wickedness in the restorative air of flamboyant ignorance.

The workers who constitute the armies of industrial evil, must too flee their posts. As they take to the streets, they will rinse away their corruption through the glory of unproductive activism.

The handful of incredibly wealthy people who have come to epitomize the inequality for which we must be forgiven, shall find their absolution in financing this holy endeavor, without the slightest impact on their bottom line, of course. For without this indulgence, our glorious Climate Based Faith would have no means by which to spread its goodness to the masses.

Once we have all abandoned our labors and our studies. We must then take our vows.

Hear my words and bear witness to my vow.
Climate changes, and now my watch begins.
It shall not change again until my death.
I shall take no spouse, hold no lands, parent no children.
I shall wear no crowns and win no glory.
I shall live and die in idleness.
I shall strive to accomplish nothing.
I am the thermometer in the darkness.
I am the watcher of the weather.
I am the dust that guards the weathervane.
I pledge my life and honor to the Goddesses of Climate, for this season until there are no seasons.


With the shame of our sins behind us, and our vows true in our hearts, we must now set off to spread the Goddesses word to the infidels.

All shall kneel before her magnificence, but let it not be said that we are intolerant. As we bring the glory of the One True Faith to the masses, our good friend, the Jew, shall be spared the sword of conversion. The Islamist too, shall be spared, so long as he bear not his fangs against the non-binary, lest we meet the wrath of his exploding shirt!

The followers of the lower case T however, must disavow their false God to be spared the boot of her divine intervention.

I had a conversation with somebody about the accelerationist factions of the White Nationalist movement recently. During that conversation, I attempted to emphasise that I did not think their advocacy of gunning down non-combatants in houses of worship to be politically helpful, which prompted the question “you don’t mind the violence, you just don’t want to be associated with it?”

The kneejerk reaction to such a question is an instinctive “I oppose violence” but I tend to think of answers like that as a copout, since violence is sort of endemic to the human condition. I gave the example of my desire to see law enforcement bring the coercive force of the State upon criminals who have harmed me, to illustrate this point. Since I agree with our laws which see only minor differences between violence and the threat thereof, I think of this reasonable and lawful exercise as “violence” strictly speaking, and thus I cannot honestly say “I oppose violence”.

When people say “I oppose violence” I tend to think of them as either being intentionally dishonest, or not intelligently processing the question. Violence is neither good nor bad, inherently, prefer though we all may, to live in perfect peace. The Democrat Party claims to oppose violence. By this opposition they advocate seizing firearms from otherwise law abiding citizens. This is quite certainly a violent act, justified by way of deception, and under color of law, though in violation of our constitution. They claim to oppose violence by refusing to enforce our immigration laws, which results in crimes, including but in no way limited to rape and murder, against our citizenry.

If that is what one means by opposition to violence, then I cannot be counted amongst the adherents of such a belief system.

As some of you know, I have recently launched some side projects with the hope of establishing new revenue streams and bringing in new listeners. Among the ones I can talk about publicly at this time are some new websites, a new marketing push, and the beginnings of a couple of different books.

These have occupied nearly all of my free time lately, with the notable exception being time I’ve spent over the last few days monitoring Andrew Anglin’s recent meltdown at the Daily Stormer, which I suspect is largely staged. This was followed by Hunter Wallace publishing the best collection of evidence against Weev published to date. These prompted me to a significant advancement on one of the book projects, writing upwards of 10,000 words, roughly a third of which I will share with you today in place of a timely oration about the news of the day.

Before I get into that, I’d like to tell you about the new sites, some of which you know about, some of which you do not.

Today I published my first piece at TransgenderismToday.com, the tagline of which is “Documenting the Decline”. I go over some recent headlines about the transgender assault on biology and reality, and some important history of the movement, which I’ll read to you on this episode.

We’ve mentioned BlacksHateFags.com on the show a few times recently. There, I’ve written several posts documenting the fact nearly all the violence against transgender people, so often mentioned by the media and the broader Left, is coming from blacks. Universally glossed over by the media, this fact, if widely exposed, shatters the rainbow coalition of mongrels and degenerates threatening the stability of our country. Moreover, it does so with a catchy name suitable for flier campaigns, and other less conventional forms of advertising, thus standing to attract fresh eyes to this and other messages we must spread to salvage that which we value.

Most recently, I covered a story there about a Jewish homosexual who was accosted by a black man on the subway, which was hilarious, and this too, we’ll discuss today.

I also mentioned SaidTheJew.com recently, and the most recent post there provides something of an addendum to the BHF post on the aforemented Jewish homosexual, which I’ll also go over.

Each site has a certain commonality. They each maintain their own independent email list, which visitors are aggressively encouraged to sign up for. Each has its own Telegram channel and RSS feed as well, likewise marketed. Other audience procurement and engagement channels are in the works for all of them, and we’ll unveil those in due course.

Additionally, each site has the same radio players embedded on ChristopherCantwell.com and RadicalAgenda.com, with the hope of bringing new listeners to this show.

I have registered several other domains, and have a list of many others which I am contemplating. These sort of niche sites, even if they only have a few pieces of compelling content, I think have huge potential, and I will create as many of them as I can come up with ideas for, since the hosting requirements of this production provide me with ample resources to host a nearly infinite number of moderately trafficked additional sites.

We’ll talk a lot more about this in the weeks and months ahead.

Anglin’s meltdown at the Daily Stormer was full of inaccuracies, which were, in my mind, purposefully delivered to provoke a response. It followed on months of such provocations, and he finally got what he was looking for, to some degree. I was watching Twitter discuss the situation, and seeing that some important pieces were missing, I set to work on adding those pieces to one of my book projects.

That project, begins as follows;

Next year’s election will mark the first in which people who were not yet born on September 11th, 2001 will have the opportunity to vote for President of the United States.

That scares the heck out of me, if I’m honest with you.

Worse than that, we’ve already had at least one presidential election where people voted who were alive, but do not remember a world before September 11th, 2001, and there will be plenty more of them this time around.

Worse still, I’m 38 years old, and I feel like I’m one of them, sometimes.

I certainly don’t remember politics before that. I never voted before 2004.

A lot of people perceive conservatism, or even Right wing thinking more broadly as trying to turn back the clock, or get back to a simpler time, or something to that effect. That’s never really been my goal, personally. That is what drew me to libertarianism at first, and later to the alt right. That very harsh rejection of Leftism, without the stupid time machine fantasies.

Yet I can’t help but think today that 18 years after those towers came down, we’ve hit this really terrible precipice in time where we might never have the sort of normalcy that, at least I perceived, before that day.

I cannot imagine a world anymore, where I take no interest in what the government is doing. That was certainly my life before I went to work that morning 18 years ago. I couldn’t have told you the difference between a Republican and a Democrat that morning. There are days it is challenging in the current era, of course, but at least now I can say “That is not how a Republican should act” and that would have gone right over my head back then.

Is that the silver lining?

Should we, in a sense, be grateful that 19 cavemen with boxcutters, or whoever, sent world affairs careening out of control nearly two decades ago?

Did the Project for a New American Century have a point in relishing the prospect of “a new Pearl Harbor“?

They had a very different plan than us, of course. The Project for a New American Century was a neocon outfit, led in part by none other than Bill Kristol. They were primarily interested in America’s “global responsibilities” as they put it. Their statement of principles says America needs to “strengthen our ties to democratic allies and to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values” and “promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad” and “accept responsibility for America’s unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles”.

And in case it requires clarification, when Bill Kristol says “our security” and “our prosperity” and “our principles” – he is not talking about America’s security, prosperity, or principles. He is talking about his own, in group, if you will.

In fact, here’s what Bill Kristol has to say about Americans in the context of immigration.

Look, to be totally honest, if things are so bad as you say with the white working class, don’t you want to get new Americans in? Seriously, you can make the case—this is going on too long and this is too crazy, probably, and I hope this thing isn’t being videotaped or ever shown anywhere. Whatever tiny, pathetic future I have is going to totally collapse.

You can make a case that America has been great because every—I think John Adams said this—basically if you’re a free society, a capitalist society, after two or three generations of hard work everyone becomes kind of decadent, lazy, spoiled—whatever. Then, luckily, you have these waves of people coming in from Italy, Ireland, Russia, and now Mexico, who really want to work hard and really want to succeed and really want their kids to live better lives than them and aren’t sort of clipping coupons or hoping that they can hang on and meanwhile grew up as spoiled kids and so forth. In that respect, I don’t know how this moment is that different from the early 20th century.

Fortunately, it was recorded.

That is not what you say about “our” country. That’s what you say about “their” country.

Notably, neither Kristol nor anyone else from PNAC says any such things about countries other than yours and mine. Their favorite country, least of all, and I leave it to the reader to guess which is their favorite.

John Bolton, you might have heard, was a director of PNAC before they dissolved in 2006. He was also the National Security Advisor to President Trump until just the other day. Fitting that he depart in time for post 9/11 America to reach the age of majority.


Created 1 year, 10 months ago.

167 videos


The Radical Agenda is a live, uncensored, open phones right wing talk radio pogrom.