Tom Kawczynski has been a guest on the Radical Agenda several times since he first came across my radar two years ago. He was the Town Manager in Jackman, Maine, before a bunch of communists found out he had opinions they didn’t like, and set out to destroy him.
Lotta good that did.
Instead of begging for mercy and crawling off into a leaf pile to die, as they had hoped, Tom became more outspoken, and more active. He has written several books, and even announced his candidacy for President of the United States.
Tom’s vision for preserving our people and way of life closely resembles my own. A secessionist movement based in the northeastern United States, which he calls “New Albion”.
Albion is an alternative name for the island of Great Britain. It is sometimes used poetically to refer to the island, but has fallen out of common use in English. Abandoned linguistic property, put to excellent use.
The New Albion Mission Statement reads;
The purpose of New Albion is to secure a homeland where Western Civilization may endure in North
America, recognizing such ends may only be accomplished in a nation which reflects the combined
talents of the European peoples who have settled here in concert with those who share our values and
wish to contribute to our civilization.
We recognize without the achievement of three basic goals that the current paradigm will destroy all
we value, and so we aspire to create a new and defensible nation with secure borders in peace and
prosperity with our neighbors, to decide whom we may admit and upon whatever basis we so choose
for our own internal development to this nation, and to revitalize a culture that honors our tradition,
heritage, and identity instead of attacking our people, our faith, our traditions, and our families as is
presently the case.
We’ll be talking about this project, Tom’s run for President, today’s 2nd Amendment protest in Richmond, Virgina, and much, much more.
People have been celebrating the death of White Nationalism since 2017. We have been banned from social media, cut out of the financial system, chased from the streets, and hunted to the brink of extinction.
But the Jew never expected our secret weapon, and today, he lives in fear like never before.
38 year old Grafton Thomas, a black man from New York, ran up in a rabbi’s house with a machete, during a Hanukkah party, and started hacking away at God’s chosen people. The Jews, disarmed by the gun control laws they themselves imposed on the jurisdiction, flung chairs and tables at the savage, but not before he seriously injured five of them, one critically. This, in stark contrast, to a shooting at a Texas church, where a man fired shots, and seconds later was gunned down by armed congregants. An outcome the Jew would surely deprive us of, if given the chance.
It should, perhaps, go without saying, that we have been blamed, as we are blamed for all things. So, facts be damned, I say we just claim credit.
There are lots of things to love about Christmas.
For Christians, today is the biggest holiday of the year, marking the birth of their savior. Even for the non-religious, in historically Christian countries, the cultural significance remains substantial. For sane people everywhere, today is, if nothing else, a day to celebrate family, friendship, culture, and yes, commerce.
Then there are the folks who are congenitally incapable of happiness. For them, today is a reminder of how miserable their own existence is, and always will be.
They see others celebrating the Christian faith, and they are thereby compelled to contemplate the comparative meaninglessness of their own lives. They mock religiosity as superstition, and “hate”. Per their habitual practice, this is projection, of course. They believe in things far more ridiculous than virgin births, and resurrection. Holding simultaneous contradicting values such as diversity and equality, renders such types incapable of reason, and the misery this instills in them results in their signature hatred for all that brings joy and peace to mankind.
Every nativity scene must be met with a menorah, and a pentagram, and every cross, with a crescent.
Santa Claus brings joy and wonder to children, and whatever glory he may steal from Jesus, Christians have, for the most part, learned to find a healthy balance. For these crestfallen creatures, however, Santa is just a reminder that their parents were liars.
Even the politically correct “Seasons Greetings” causes conniptions in these malcontents. Climate theology has caused them to see every weather event from blizzards to heatwaves, as proof that the end is nigh. Where you see a “White Christmas” they see only carbon emissions, Greta Thunberg, and Al Gore.
Christmas trees are yet another thorn in their collective side. Where you see a decoration under which to place gifts, they see deforestation, and a reminder of their desire to be reduced to mere animals incapable of impacting the environment.
And of course, those gifts themselves are rather problematic. These types hate to be reminded that they are, in most cases, incapable of adding enough value to the economy to feed themselves, much less producing the sort of excess requisite of gifting. The rich ones are even worse, in many cases, since they are devoid of the emotional capacity to appreciate the spirit of gifting, and this practice simply becomes another math problem for them. It should almost go without saying, that anything which improves the economy they seek to destroy, really just easts them alive, especially if it makes Donald Trump look good.
For a lot of our fellow conservatives, these miserable Left wing pieces of garbage threaten to drag down their enjoyment of the holiday. For us, their misery is just one more thing to be happy about.
This is actually my favorite part of Christmas. Leftists manage to cause so much misery throughout the year, and when this holiday rolls around, they try to ruin it for everyone else. The effort falls flat on Christmas, however, because the collective joy of the population is seemingly impervious to their whining, in contrast to other days. That is, perhaps more than anything, what Leftists hate about Christmas. For 364 days a year, they can ruin somebody’s day, and when they find this to be an insurmountable challenge, they can barely contain themselves.
So, today, we’ll have a good laugh at their expense, going over some of their most ridiculous outrages. From “Baby it’s Cold Outside” to Rudolph’s sexist dad, year after year, Leftists have tried, and failed, to ruin Christmas, and their frustration with this is the most priceless gift of all.
Tessa Rane Majors had barely been in New York City for three months when she was stabbed to death in Morningside Park near Barnard College, a private women’s liberal arts school she was attending as a first year student. The area of Manhattan where the college is located, boasts a 44.2% black population, and authorities had been conspicuously tight lipped about details concerning any identifying information of the “teens” who took her life in what has been described as a mugging. A 13-year-old boy who lives in Harlem was arrested in connection with the killing, and charged as a juvenile with second-degree felony murder, robbery and criminal possession of a weapon.
Paulina Pinsky, 27, a writer who went to Barnard as an undergrad and lived in the area her whole life, said, “I think about that 13-year-old. I think about how desperate he must have been for something.” She added, “It could have been any of us. You walk around here at Barnard, a place you worked your whole life to get to, and you think you’re immune to everything, but life can be snatched away from you at any moment, no matter how privileged you are.”
This was precisely the thinking that got Tessa’s privilege checked for the last time.
Growing up in Charlottesville, Virginia taught Tessa the religion of racial equality, and she lived the values she had learned there right up until the moment feathers from her down jacket began littering the crime scene. Reportedly in search of marijuana, the green haired 18 year old former blonde , entered Morningside Park around 5:30pm, and as she was inquiring of local residents as to the availability of sticky green, she happened upon some “teens” whose business ethics were, to say the least of it, questionable.
I’ve got a white pill for ya today.
Here at the Radical Agenda, we have been under the mistaken impression for the last few years that the Department of Justice was politicized during the Obama administration, and had turned the terrifying powers of the intelligence services to political purposes.
Fortunately for us, it turns out this was a false alarm. DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, a Jewish Obama appointee, has cleared James Comey, Andrew McCabe, and other senior officials of acting on political bias. As it turns out, the numerous “omissions” and “inaccuracies” in the application process, were just honest mistakes. The IG probe identified at least 17 “significant” errors in the FISA applications, and said they would launch a new audit into the FISA process.
Nothing to see here, goy. Move along.
Fortunately, US Attorney John Durham is not fooled by this whitewash. He released a statement saying
“I have the utmost respect for the mission of the Office of Inspector General and the comprehensive work that went into the report prepared by Mr. Horowitz and his staff. However, our investigation is not limited to developing information from within component parts of the Justice Department. Our investigation has included developing information from other persons and entities, both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”
Oh uh! Foreign sources! He's workin for the Russians!
Nancy Pelosi’s decision to begin her impeachment announcement with words from America’s Declaration of Independence, could not have been more fit to the purpose of the stunt.
That only makes sense, if you realize that removing the President from office by way of a Senate trial, is not the purpose of the exercise.
“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another,” was far more genuine an utterance than the rest of her faux fondness for the founders. Pelosi clearly has no desire to keep a Republican form of government, and no matter how many times she quotes Benjamin Franklin, no informed observer will ever believe that she does. As far as Pelosi and her handlers are concerned, Thomas Jefferson was a slave raping hypocrite. On most days, their contempt for the Constitution and American History is hardly even disguised, and if you think any of them asked Jesus for help with this decision, then you better put that pipe down before you burn your fingers.
There’s that phrase again. “Conspiracy Theory” has been uttered very frequently as of late, by desperate politicians, clinging to power like their lives depend on it.
We hear this often enough that I could, and soon will, address the issue of the phrase itself, devoid of the context of the moment. To connect today’s episode to the news of the day though, I’ll mention that several current events have me musing about the terminology.
Most prominent is the ongoing show trial in the United States House of Representatives, pertaining to the supposed impeachment of President Donald J. Trump. Democrats allege that Trump abused the power of his office to aid in his own reelection, and pursued a “debunked conspiracy theory” that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election.
To hear Representative Adam “Shifty” Schiff tell it, this preposterous claim is a product of Russian spies, devoid of any tether to the physical universe. To even mention this possibility is evidence of outright treason against the United States, as only one in the employ of the Kremlin would dare to speak such subversive filth.
Curiously, Schiff’s outrage over conspiracy theories seems quite narrow. No such indignation was forthcoming when Hillary Clinton alleged, sans evidence, that Tulsi Gabbard and Jill Stein were “Russian assets”. Van Jones remains a Democrat in good standing, despite signing a petition by 9/11 truthers. Schiff himself peddled “Russia collusion” for months, falsely claiming in televised interviews that he was privy to evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election. No such evidence was forthcoming, after years long investigations by the Special Counsel’s office, the House of Representatives, and the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Whatever the case, a “conspiracy theory” is just that. It is a theory, about more than one individual, conspiring to do some illicit thing. All investigations involving more than one suspect, are, by definition, conspiracy theories.
Despite the plain meaning of the language, the phrase, in common parlance, has become synonymous with falsehood. It is a common utterance in news discussions “this is not a conspiracy, this actually happened” as if the two things were mutually exclusive. The FBI has recently classified “conspiracy theory-driven domestic extremists” as a terror threat, as if they were trying to mess with such “extremists” by confirming their worst fears. Being branded a “conspiracy theorist” is mere millimeters below being branded a “racist” in today’s political discourse, and for this reason, people would sooner deny the obvious truth, than bear the cost of espousing such unpopular views.
Perhaps the most common complaint about so-called “conspiracy theories” is that they are not true, by definition. To make this assertion, the person making it must necessarily have studied every conspiracy theory, and deemed all of them to be false. Since their premise is usually that we shouldn’t even be discussing these things, I find this terribly unlikely. With the Alex Jones program airing seven days a week, and InfoWars.com pumping out articles every single day, even the most dedicated conspiracy theorist would have his hands full trying to confirm or debunk all of them. Add to this dozens if not hundreds of other conspiracy theory websites, radio shows, and podcasts, and the task of finding out about all them, much less researching them, becomes quite the chore. Someone who dismisses an entire class of information, just because they call it a “conspiracy theory” is certainly not spending nearly that much time researching all of these ideas.
Disgraced FBI lawyer Lisa Page, best known for having sex with a married co-worker, and abusing the power of her office to assist Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidential election, has recently come out of hiding. She sought to defend what remains of her name, from what she laughably sees as unfair attacks on her by the President of the United States.
The first hint that she is every bit as bad as you think she is, comes from the publication carrying the interview.
The Daily Beast, which is, in reality, little more than an Antifa blog.
Page is obviously somebody that almost any media outlet would love to speak with. She could have had a softball interview with glowing commentary from the New York Times, the Washington Post, or any other newspaper. She could have gone live on CNN or MSNBC, and been treated as a hero for her assaults on marriage, democracy, and the rule of law. She chose the Daily Beast, specifically, for their low journalistic standards, and what one might safely bet was an established agreement to ask absolutely zero difficult questions.
Instead of asking Page anything meaningful, Molly Jong-Fast spends all 3500+ words assuring the reader that this FBI lawyer could not possibly have done anything even remotely suspicious, let alone illegal. The real problem is that conspiracy theorist in the White House, and the “harassment” Page has suffered for no other reason than being a woman. It almost goes without saying, that they blamed Russia for the scandal, and adamantly denied that Ukraine could possibly have made the slightest effort to impact the 2016 election.
Speaking of Ukraine, their human resources director, Joe Biden, is traveling about Iowa on a “No Malarkey” tour. Given what we know about Joe Biden, we can be quite certain that “malarkey” would be a rather charitable term to describe whatever nonsense he is feeding Iowa caucus goers. Perhaps he’ll host a town hall meeting with MS-13 members, and introduce them as a “courageous group of Americans“.
I suppose, like Lisa Page, he figures he can get away with saying whatever he wants, thanks to a cooperative media. For a brief moment, it seemed like the Internet would loosen their stranglehold on the flow of information, but that dream came to an abrupt end when people figured out that free speech invariably results in anti-Semitism. Once the Left saw how easy it was to silence so-called “Nazis”, they obviously had to see how far they could leverage that power, and they have yet to find a limit.
Most recently, it was announced that Google and YouTube have taken down over 300 advertisements by the Trump campaign.
60 Minutes reviewed the archive to learn more about President Trump’s problematic political ads. We found that over 300 video ads were taken down by Google and YouTube, mostly over the summer, for violating company policy. But the archive doesn’t detail what policy was violated. Was it copyright violation? A lie or extreme inaccuracy? Faulty grammar? Bad punctuation? It’s unclear. The ads determined to be offending are not available to be screened. We found very little transparency in the transparency report.
CBS did not seem interested in finding out if any Democrats had similar problems. They probably just operated under the safe assumption that this was a narrowly focused enforcement of real or imagined policy violations, specifically designed to damage the Trump campaign, and posted the story as more of a celebration than as anything resembling news. This is something you might expect from CBS, but I was somewhat surprised to see that PJMedia, TownHall, and Breitbart, all similarly failed to ask this obvious question.
I decided to check for myself, and I found more or less what one would expect. Biden has had no ads removed whatsoever. Warren has had some ads removed, which usually came in spurts, indicating perhaps an effort to run the same violation multiple times before moving on, but nowhere near as many as Trump.
Even if it were done perfectly even, the impact is obvious, and no sane person doubts Google’s intent. The Democrats have the entirety of the media behind them, and do not require digital advertising in the way Trump and other Republicans do.
Google announced an update to their advertising policy last month, which limited the targeting of political advertising. Trump and the Republican Party condemned the policy change, noting the obviousness of the intent.
Twitter, as you’ve surely heard, announced that they would stop selling political ads altogether. Well, not exactly, of course. They just won’t sell ads to political campaigns, PACs, or 501(c)4 groups pursuing legislative or electoral outcomes. If Planned Parenthood wants to flood Twitter with abortion propaganda, and that propaganda links to other material on immigration, that’s perfectly fine with Jack.
Maybe that’s why Jack decided he’s going to spend much of 2020 in Africa.
It’s that time of year again. Shoppers are out chasing illusive bargains on crap they don’t need, for people they don’t like. For the privilege of being the first to empty their wallets and incur interest bearing debt, they have resorted to violence and hoax threats.
That’s not very interesting, so let’s talk about Jews, instead.
You might recall from a recent episode, how our friends at SaidTheJew.com had uncovered some observations about the impeachment sham. Specifically, the demographic overrepresentation of Jews in the process, became impossible even for the Jews themselves to ignore. The more names that get dropped, the more this pronounced this phenomenon becomes.
But, there is a reason SaidTheJew.com has their tagline set as “If we said it, they would call us Nazis”.
The Jerusalem Post proves the point with this headline “Antisemitic pastor calls Donald Trump impeachment ‘Jew coup’”
It almost goes without saying, the Pastor was quickly banned from YouTube for pointing this out.
“That’s the way the Jews work, they are deceivers, they plot, they lie, they do whatever they have to do to accomplish their political agenda,” Wiles said on what he calls the “Godcast.”
“This is a coup led by Jews to overthrow the constitutionally elected president of the United States and it’s beyond removing Donald Trump, it’s removing you and me. That’s what’s at the heart of it. … I am going to tell you, Church of Jesus Christ, you’re next. Get it through your head! They’re coming for you. There will be a purge. That’s the next thing that happens when Jews take over a country, they kill millions of Christians.”
Right now, the channel appears to be back online, but with few videos and only going back two weeks. (Update, the ban was just for one week.)
That wasn’t the only side project of ours that recently made headlines. Our friends over at BlacksHateFags.com have been diligently pointing out the real reason that Pete Booty Judge will never be president, which, as the name implies, is because Blacks Hate Fags. This wisdom made its way into the national discourse when Andy Ngo pointed out to Chelsea Clinton that “The US is one of the safest countries for trans people. The murder rate of trans victims is actually lower than that for cis population. Also, who is behind the murders? Mostly black men.”
This bit of obvious truth was too “hateful” for Twitter, and they gave him a 12 hour ban, after forcing him to remove the “hate fact” Tweet.
Here at the Outlaw Conservative, we tend to pride ourselves on rejecting the oppressive doctrines of political correctness.
This is not to say that we are heartless, however. We are not entirely unconscious of the disparities which exist between demographic groups, nor are we devoid of sympathy for the hardships that some of those disparities entail. So, as we launch this Thanksgiving Eve special episode of the show, we would first like to pause for a moment of contemplation.
Americans often get wrapped up in certain themes of this holiday. Turkey, pumpkin pie, football, doorbuster sales, and inner city single moms fighting over discounted flat screens.
But there is more to it than that, of course.
Consider how tough this day is for some Americans. Elizabeth Warren, for example. Her family was once made up entirely of noble savages who lived in harmony with the Earth. They welcomed immigrants from Europe, and taught them how to plant fish. In return for their kindness, they were nearly wiped out by interbreeding, superior technology, and infectious diseases. The ravages of uncontrolled immigration were so devastating to Warren’s tribe, that the Massachusetts Senator is now only 1/1024th Native American.
This dissolution of Native lineage and culture has been devastating in so many ways. Not only has our fashion been largely deprived the benefit of feathers, but the cost of housing has skyrocketed as we replaced cost efficient teepees, with permanent structures that require constant and costly maintenance. Peace pipes have been replaced, first by cigars, then cigarettes, and now by deadly vaping devices. Absent those peace pipes, we have been cursed with mass shootings, which would never have been possible, had we stuck to tomahawks and arrows. The replacement of wampum with Federal Reserve Notes has resulted in business cycles, inflation, and fractional reserve banking.
Smallpox blankets and firewater remind us of how devastating free trade was to the Native Americans. Lessons which, had we remembered, might have saved us from Chinese fentanyl and antifreeze toothpaste.
Perhaps it is overdue that we abandon our false narratives of this time period.
Fortunate then, perhaps, that Education Week and PBS are telling the story of public school teachers helping students to “unlearn” the “myth” of Thanksgiving.
On a recent episode of Outlaw Conservative, I remarked about how even Democrats don’t believe their own media anymore. I was somewhat black pilled about this at the time, because it does illustrate a somewhat frightening phenomenon in that, even though they know the media is lying, they don’t seem to mind all that much.
The glimmer of hope recently visited upon my inbox by Rasmussen, shows that while a troubling number of people believe America is on the brink of civil war, most of those concerned about political violence are well aware who poses the real threat to this country.
Voters see a bigger threat from President Trump’s opponents over policy issues than from his supporters if Democrats succeed in removing him from office. One-in-three still see the threat of civil war in the near future.
These polling results show a staggering disconnect between those polled and what the media says. The average Democrat seems to have figured out that the people wearing masks and setting limousines on fire, aren’t quite the flower picking hippies that the media makes them out to be. The drumfire of nonsense about “White Supremacist Terrorism” seems to have faded from their minds, despite the best efforts of propagandists to elevate this narrative.
What I find most interesting, is that the Left fears Left wing violence, not if Trump wins re-election, but rather, if Trump is removed from office by way of impeachment.
This shows a really profound understanding of how these people actually operate. Leftists are not mere hostage takers, who release the victim when they get their ransom. They escalate when they win, far more than when they lose. Their insatiable thirst for chaos and destruction, is not quenched by the waters of victory.
It would be more analogous to say that victory to them is like drinking seawater. Their throats sore from screaming, their mouths dry from marijuana and poor dental hygiene, they initially welcome that first gulp of salty refreshment, only to feel the thirst get worse by the second. They imbibe until their stomachs are full, and remain perplexed at how nothing at all seems to satisfy their discomfort and anxiety.
Rather than ditch the Brawndo and give Poland Spring a chance, they call Poland a racist country, and curse the tyranny of their own biology.
They got Chick-fil-A.
The company’s charitable foundation, recently announced that they would stop financing the Salvation Army, the Paul Anderson Youth Home, and the Fellowship of Christian Athletes. These organizations have been slammed as “anti-LGBTQP” for agreeing with 2008 Barack Obama on the definition of marriage, and Chick-fil-A hopes the move will help soften the relentless smear campaign being waged against them by the sexual deviant lobby.
Predictably, this has proved less effective than prayer.
Drew Anderson, director of campaigns for the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) said in a statement to CNN, “In addition to refraining from financially supporting anti-LGBTQ organizations, Chick-fil-A still lacks policies to ensure safe workplaces for LGBTQ employees and should unequivocally speak out against the anti-LGBTQ reputation that their brand represents”.
In case you are unfamiliar with the lingo of these people, I’ll translate. Mr. Anderson has informed the world, “We would like to thank the Chick-fil-A foundation for chumming the waters. Our piranhas were hungry for human sacrifice, and your blood has reinvigorated us. Let this be a warning to decent people everywhere. We are coming for you, and we will stop at nothing to destroy the family, the individual, and every other building block of your civilizations. As we march toward compulsory universal birth control, and the extinction of the human race, we encourage you all to lay down your arms, and submit to our demands without further resistance. We seek only your annihilation, not your suffering, and for this, you must be grateful.”
The Salvation Army got the message loud and clear. Upon news of the financial loss, they gave an interview to Out.com;
“As we’ve better understood the needs of the LGTBTQ+ community, we’ve evolved our approach,” Jolley wrote to Out. “As we build and remodel emergency shelters and transitional housing across the country, we consider ways to help LGBTQ+ individuals feel safe and cared for. We also have specific programs and resources across the country, such as a dorm in Las Vegas that is exclusive for transgender individuals, a detoxification facility in San Francisco that caters to those infected with HIV/AIDS, and our work in Baltimore to meet the needs of transgender individuals who are trafficked.”
Yes, that’s right, fine members of the gender binary. The Salvation Army has entire facilities dedicated to LGBTQP people, and has allocated resources to “helping” HIV patients and transgender prostitutes, but even they, are “anti-LGBTQP” in the eyes of the degenerate lobby.
On the bright side, it likely won’t be long before you’ll be able to get a Spicy Chicken Sandwich, lemonade, and waffle fries, on a Sunday. After your kids have finished eating, they can go play in the ball pit, while a convicted sex offender in a dress reads them a story about their cross sex hormone options. If you thank the story teller profusely enough, you might even manage to avoid your children ending up in foster care. It’s a long shot, but you can try, anyway…
There are plenty of interesting things going on in the news today, and we’ll get to talking about them on this evening’s episode of the Radical Agenda, but none of them gave me any particular inspiration to write about.
Fortunately, as regular listeners have heard me mention, I’ve done a great deal of other writing for a book I am working on. Today, I will give you a sneak preview of one of the funniest stories I’ve ever had the joy of being a part of. For some of you, this will be a fun trip down memory lane. For others, it will provide important insight as to how the Radical Agenda came to be.
Once upon a time, I thought the Left vs. Right political paradigm was stupid. A big scam to take our economic and personal liberties away, one piece at a time, in alternating fashion. I had no more use for the Right than I did for the Left, and I was solidly convinced that the abolition of the State was sure to eventually cut the short list of life’s certainties in half.
Then Leftists began getting really belligerent within the libertarian movement, and I started realize that they had to be dealt with before anything resembling a libertarian social order could even be contemplated. At first I just thought they were stupid, and could be mocked into obscurity, but with time, it became obvious that this was a larger problem than laughter would be capable of overcoming.
Today, I share with you a story from the good old days, when I still believed humor was the answer.
Our good friends at SaidTheJew.com picked up on a fun theme running through various openly Jewish publications.
If you’ve been keeping up with the Trump impeachment scam, you probably assumed Jews were behind it, just from the volume of lies and hysteria.
Then there’s the fact that the guy most prominently perpetrating the fraud, is Adam Schiff, the Jewish chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.
That is hardly the end of the list, as it turns out. Like anything terrible going on in government these days, Jewish involvement in the impeachment sham is pretty pervasive.
Spotting the Jew can be a difficult task sometimes. They often dress like goyim, especially when they are trying to trick us. They have been known to get nose jobs. They even say things like “my fellow White people” just to keep their cover.
If you “name the Jew”, somebody is probably going to call you a Nazi.
That is, unless you are a Jew. Then it’s not anti-Semitic. It’s just bragging.
It’s been an exciting three weeks in Clown World. Frightening, even.
Long time listeners will recall that I used to think people were crazy for doubting certain historical narratives. I used to think it would be impossible for so many people, to tell the same lies, for so long, and convince so many, so thoroughly. I had to rethink that theory, after I became the subject of a fake news story a couple of years ago.
Once you realize how spectacularly the news lies, it follows that news tends to eventually become history. If our history books are half as dishonest as our newspapers, then we really can’t claim to have any firm understanding of history at all.
No wonder we keep repeating it.
It will definitely be interesting to see how this plays out, going forward. We know the surveillance apparatus of the US government is quite expansive, and we can be just as certain that we don’t know every detail of it. Everyone carries a camera now. Homes and businesses have security cameras. Pictures, video, and audio can be transferred around the world in the blink of an eye. While the tech and media overlords can suppress information enough that only determined people can find it, these days they cannot really get rid of evidence nearly so easily, as they could in the mid 1900s. The news lies with such shocking consistency, that it really has to make you wonder what the history books will say about these times, but given the availability and durability of information in the current era, there is perhaps some glimmer of hope that the people of the future will be better informed about today, than we were of yesteryear.
Or maybe not.
The confidence some people seem to have in their deceptions leaves room for doubt.
In the book I am working on, the description of how I shifted from libertarianism to White Nationalism was a long, gradual process, which I cover in considerable detail.
Those of you who have been with me for a long time, will find it unsurprising that the name Adam Kokesh came up several times in telling that tale.
Adam and I ran for the United States House of Representatives at the same time in 2010. Adam’s campaign was considerably more successful than mine, in that although neither of us have ever sponsored a major piece of legislation, Adam at least made the ballot. He had obtained the coveted endorsement of Dr. Ron Paul, which was a big boost to the already substantial reputation he had built for himself, as an activist with a group called Iraq Veterans Against the War.
In the nine years since then, Adam and I have had a pretty interesting relationship. His YouTube notoriety was a large part of my inspiration for becoming a content producer. At times, the casual observer might have thought we were best friends, and at others, mortal enemies. We have taken shots at eachother in our content and on social media, then gone right back to collaborating on content together, as if none of those things had ever happened. When I thought he had earned criticism, I was not at all hesitant to provide it, and when I thought he was being attacked unfairly, I came to his defense.
Most recently, Adam and I were invited to debate one another back in January of 2017, at a live event hosted by the Rothbardian Circle in Miami. We tackled the subject of immigration, and the broader merits of diversity. Whatever one’s view of things, all seemed to agree it made for an entertaining and thought provoking exchange.
Given Adam’s Jewish ancestry, it is perhaps no surprise that we have grown more distant since I was plastered all over the news as a famous Nazi.
We have not completely lost contact, however.
I have remained subscribed to his email list, and it is one of few newsletters that I still read. Having had him in my phone’s contacts the entire time, I realized he was also my Telegram contact after I became a frequent user of that application. So, occasionally, we shoot eachother a message via that medium, when one of us comes across the other’s radar.
Adam was fresh in my mind from my work on the book, when I saw this Rasmussen Poll titled “Surprising Number Say Third-Party Presidential Vote Likely in 2020“.
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 38% of Likely U.S. Voters say they are likely to vote for someone other than President Trump or the Democratic presidential nominee in next year’s election. That includes 22% who are Very Likely to do so.
Adam is currently seeking the Libertarian Party’s nomination for President of the United States in next year’s all important election. He is calling for an “orderly dissolution” of the United States Federal Government, and calls his campaign the “American Referendum”. Though I remain reluctant to endorse his candidacy, for obvious, and not so obvious reasons, I find some aspects of what he says to be quite appealing.
In the somewhat unlikely event that he were to succeed in this effort, Adam’s plan would not impose anarchy throughout the continent of North America. As I understand it, his program would, essentially, leave it to the individual state and local governments to chart their own course for the future. If California wants to have open borders and a generous welfare state, they can destroy themselves in this fashion without dragging New Hampshire down with them. If one geographic region wanted to band together as a federation of all White ethnostates, President Kokesh would not send troops to stop them. If one region wanted to adopt high tech direct democracy, and another instead chose a hereditary monarchy, neither would meet opposition from the Kokesh administration, save for perhaps some verbal or written criticism.
As a purely political matter, Trump supporters might stand to benefit from Adam obtaining the Libertarian Party’s nomination.
The conventional thinking, is that Libertarian candidates deprive Republicans of votes which would otherwise have gone their way, if not for the Libertarian’s presence on the ballot. Issues like taxes, regulation, and gun rights, are largely shared between the two parties, and since Libertarians are more concerned with ideas than political power, they can afford to take firmer positions on such issues than their Republican counterparts. This makes Libertarians an appealing “protest vote” for hard line single issue voters of the Right.
We are fortunate to live in times when conventional thinking does a poor job of predicting the future, however.
Firstly, one doubts many prior Trump supporters would defect to support Adam.
The nationalist fervor stirred by Trump, hardly leaves GOP voters anxious to break up the Union. While many Republicans might cons
If you’ve been listening to the Radical Agenda or Outlaw Conservative podcasts, you have likely heard by now that I have been planning to take a few weeks off from the live shows. There are a number of reasons for this, some of which I can tell you about, and some of which I cannot. Those of you who have been with me through other moments when I needed some time off, have noted that when I came back from such breaks, I’ve come back stronger than ever.
I assure you, this will be no exception.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently gave a talk at Georgetown University, supposedly reiterating his dedication to freedom of expression, in a world careening toward illiberal constraints on thought, word, and deed. The speech came on the heels of widespread hysteria over his meeting with such controversial figures on the Right as Tucker Carlson, and Byron York.
After seemingly discovering the obvious truth that censorious Left wing fanatics can never be satisfied, Zuckerberg now appears to be attempting to bring his company back from the brink of uselessness, by seeking some limits on the push to silence everyone the outrage mob sets their sights on. Presumably with some concern for the backlash which will ensue after a Republican landslide in 2020, Zuckerberg drew the line at deplatforming the President of the United States.
Simultaneously, he doubled down on his dedication to stamping out so called “hate speech” and “terrorist propaganda” and eliminating “foreign interference” in American elections, which to the careful observer, means only that the catastrophic policies of recent years will continue unabated. Politicians can lie on his platform, favored causes can break the laws of their jurisdictions, violence against disfavored groups can be promoted, but private citizens who speak out of turn, or who utter truths which inconvenience the egalitarian narrative, will continue to be suppressed for as long as governments permit such manipulation of the National conversation.
One need not be a statistician to see the foolishness of this.
Last night, a dozen Democrats did their best impressions of CNN opinion hosts, competing for the chance to lose next year’s presidential election to Donald Trump. I watched every minute of the entire spectacle, and under normal circumstances, would consider it my professional obligation to provide some post debate analysis on today’s episode.
Today’s Democrat Party, however, does not warrant much in the way of analysis. The strategy being deployed has nothing to do with actual policy, and has instead dwindled to what may as well have been grunts and clicks, designed to appeal only to unthinking emotional responses. This exercise in non-reality will be the politics of our future, if immigration is not slowed, and American birthrates are not increased, but the Democrats have, much to their detriment, jumped the gun. The collective IQ of the Nation has not yet dropped so far as to warrant this sort of campaigning, and as a result, Donald Trump is all but guaranteed victory in 2020.
The smart people have already figured this out. Mark Zuckerberg, however countless his flaws, is a smart person.
Seeing the writing on the wall, Zuckerberg has been confidentially meeting with conservative personalities, including Tucker Carlson. This revelation has driven Leftists absolutely insane, resulting in, amongst other things, the hashtag #DeleteFacebook recently trending on Twitter.
Little is known about the contents of their talks, but one imagines it has a great deal to do with Left wing bias in the platform’s staffing and content moderation policies. Republicans have been pointing out that the immunity provisions of the Communications Decency Act, only exempt neutral platforms from lawsuits over content. If Facebook and other social media companies are going to be in the business of content moderation, this in fact makes them publishers, who thus ought to be held legally responsible for the content on their platforms. Seeing the law applied in this way would either put Facebook out of business, or cause them to dramatically alter the way they do business, in the blink of an eye.
It has become obvious that the Trump administration will do nothing to rectify this situation before next year’s election, and so far it has seemed that the search and social media platforms have placed all their eggs in the singular basket, of aiding a Democrat victory in 2020. This path is fraught with perils, for a number of reasons.
Created 2 years, 1 month ago.
The Radical Agenda is a live, uncensored, open phones right wing talk radio pogrom.