Common law sheriffs deliver 400 Grand Jury orders to Western Australian Parliament.

Time for the farmers to go back to their farms.

Boxing Day update, hoping to work closely with NZ's Liz Gunn for Commonwealth Nationals and restoration of the de jure Commonwealth Parliaments.

Update December 20th 2023, Col Blanch documents released.

Update from the Sunday session in Witchcliffe Western Australia

Dusted off and ready for the next round!

20th October, invasion on hearsay, no warrant, no evidence, no court documents, no documents, unlawful forced entry, damages to heritage property.

Romani v State of New South Wales [2023] NSWSC 49
68 Nonetheless, aggravated damages may be awarded to vindicate a plaintiff’s interest against invasion of the exclusive possession of the plaintiff and this interest extends to the freedom from disturbance of those persons present there with the leave of the plaintiff, at least as family members or as an incident of some other bona fide domestic relationship: NSW v Ibbett at [31]. Thus, in the present case, the affront to Maia and Sanchia’s son, who were present and participated in or observed the incident, because of the police officers’ conduct and manner of questioning which caused them to feel intimidated as well as anxious, distressed, worried and traumatised, amounted to intangible injury to Sanchia which aggravated the infringement of her right to enjoy exclusive and quiet possession of the land by herself and her family free from uninvited intrusion and disturbance.
69 Consequently, in the present case, I am satisfied that Sanchia is also entitled to an award of aggravated damages having regard to the effect on her and her family members of the circumstances and manner of the police officers’ wrongdoing, especially their entering the property despite the locked gate and the signs, their failure to leave the property when requested, their questioning of Maia in a manner that was perceived as intimidating, their comments to Maia about returning that were also perceived as intimidating and their general attitude that was perceived as disrespectful.

and

Plenty v Dillion (1991) 171 CLR 635

5. The proposition that any person who “set(s) his foot upon my ground without my licence … is liable to an action” in trespass is qualified by exceptions both at common law and by statute. The first ground relied on to authorize or excuse the entry of Constables Dillon and Will on Mr Plenty’s farm on the occasion of the attempted service of the fresh summons was the common law rule known as the third rule in Semayne’s Case (1604) 5 Co Rep 91a, at p 91b (77 ER 194, at p 195) which reads:

” In all cases when the King is party, the sheriff (if the doors be not open) may break the party’s house, either to arrest him, or to do other execution of the (King)’s process, if otherwise he cannot enter. But before he breaks it, he ought to signify the cause of his coming, and to make request to open doors”.

Update on progress

Call to make appointment with local Police for Petah Stone's farm on the 17th October 2023

Lake Grace Police Station 18th October 2023

On 17th October 2023

Bystander footage of same events at the entry to property 11th October 2023

Common Law Sheriffs confirm the occupiers have 28 days to vacate.
Follow progress on Rod Culleton's BitChute channel: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/vzHlf9BnA3HV/

Wrap up of the days proceedings.
Cuts out at the end, batteries must have died. Apologies for the abrupt end.

The evidence on record. Landmark "loan book", Royal Commission findings and the evidence of unlawful process.

Common Law sheriffs serve Notice to current occupiers to vacate. Sheriffs will return to take possession of the property on 11th October 2023, giving the current occupiers a further 28 days to remove their personal belongings.
Follow progress on Rod Culleton's BitChute channel: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/vzHlf9BnA3HV/

Surveying the damage of clearing native bushland

Altering a title is a criminal offence. Will add the relevant sections here shortly.
As for disposing of titles:
Criminal Code Act Compilation Act 1913 (WA) Criminal Code Acts are similar in each State and Territory.

Chapter XXXVII — Offences analogous to stealing

379.Concealing official register

Any person who, with intent to defraud, conceals or takes from its place of deposit any register which is authorised or required by law to be kept for authenticating or recording the title to any property, or for recording births, baptisms, marriages, deaths, or burials, or a copy of any part of any such register which is required by law to be sent to any public officer, is guilty of a crime, and is liable to imprisonment for 14 years.

Alternative offence: s. 424.

[Section 379 amended: No. 51 of 1992 s. 16(2); No. 70 of 2004 s. 36(3).]

380.Concealing will

Any person who, with intent to defraud, conceals any testamentary instrument, whether the testator is living or dead, is guilty of a crime, and is liable to imprisonment for 14 years.

[Section 380 amended: No. 51 of 1992 s. 16(2).]

381.Concealing certificate of title etc.

Any person who, with intent to defraud, conceals the whole or part of any document which is evidence of title to any land or estate in land is guilty of a crime, and is liable to imprisonment for 3 years.

[Section 381 amended: No. 51 of 1992 s. 16(2).]

Rod Culleton at the World Rally for Freedom, September 23 Perth.