- Government pushes highly toxic, ineffective drugs using fraudulent, misleading studies. These drugs are without exception patented and obscenely profitable. It could be AZT and it could also be remdesivir, monoclonal antibodies, paxlovid, COVID 'vaccines', etc. Any negative information about the drugs ― e.g. that they are unnecessary, highly toxic, ineffective or countereffective, or have enormous potential adverse effects ― is suppressed.
- Medical tyranny: Government shows no interest whatsoever in cheap (i.e. unprofitable), safe, highly effective medications, and makes it almost impossible to use them. It could be peptite T and compound Q, but also hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.
The government has many ways to limit its use, such as:
(a) disallow prescription for certain diseases (even though off-label prescription is both legal and commonplace, and the government admits the drug is extremely safe) and/or get pharmacies to refuse distribution
(b) smear doctors who prescribe treatment
(c) limit distribution over trivialities (e.g. imperfect labeling)
(d) spread lies (e.g. HCQ's cardiac toxicity, that it was 'proven' it is ineffective). This can be done through the publication of scientific articles, which may be retracted after the damage has already been done, and which are used as justification for policies even after they have been retracted
(e) make sure doctors who prescribe treatment are fired and lose their licenses or get fines
(f) conduct fraudulent, misleading studies to 'show' the drugs are ineffective or toxic
(g) block or handicap scientific studies of the drug (e.g. by not allowing drug combinations or adequate doses), all the while claiming that the drugs cannot be used due to 'insufficient evidence'.
- The law says patients have a right to try treatment, especially if they are terminally ill, but government institutions interpret this in such a way that patients are ONLY allowed to try what the government ALLOWS them to try.
The FDA's mandate was to protect people, but in reality, it prevents them from getting help. Courts may be highly disturbed by the government's bullying tactics, but they lack authority to force them to change their tune.
- Although Anthony Fauci is far from the only criminal, he is the most prominent one over the last 4 decades, and is extremely adept at performing the charlatan role.
Most people revere him as a self-less expert who works tirelessly for public health and has dedicated his life to this cause. They don't see through his facade and recognize that charlatan that he really is.
Most people are also fooled by the difference between the alphabet agencies' official mandate and their true goals.
- There are enormous conflicts of interest in the whole 'health care' industry. Some reasons:
(a) both government institutions and their employees get financial kick-backs from licensed drugs, under the 1984 Bayh-Dole law
(b) the revolving door between government and industry: government employees who are supposed to referee industry play nice, only to go straight from government to industry for a very lucrative reward
(c) government sends billions of dollars every year to universities, research institutions, media, churches, sports leagues, charities, etc. This sponsoring comes with current and future strings attached. The receivers of the sponsoring know that if they don't obey government orders, the sponsoring will stop.
Government employees will not receive the bonus if highly profitable drugs/vaccines are not sold in large quantities. This means they must exaggerate the threat, limit alternatives, push only highly profitable drugs by exaggerating their necessity/safety/efficacy, and make citizens miserable so that they will line up for the highly profitable drugs.
Not mentioned in this video is that politicians also have enormous conflicts of interest, e.g. because they receive funding from special interest groups. So do (U.S.) media, since they receive enormous amounts of money from industry and sometimes also from the government.
- Dissenters are framed as quack, conspiracy theorists who are a threat to public health and wellbeing. Dissenters who are qualified and credible can count on 'special treatment'. Promoters of the official story refer to the overwhelming scientific consensus, which is at best an artificial consensus (achieved by intimidation and censoring).
- Storm the NIH: Some were rightly fed up and started to protest, but most didn't.
- Especially during the COVID 'pandemic', the media were complicit in spreading fear porn, pushing measures of mass destruction, brainwashing, spreading propaganda, silencing and smearing dissenters.
