Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.
Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.
Report Content
We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.
Thank you for submitting your report
We will investigate and take the appropriate action.
đ´ COVID19 WHY I QUESTION HIV: KARY MULLIS CREATOR OF THE PCR TEST FALSE POSITIVE FAUCI FRAUD đ´
Buy me a 'cup of coffee' đ https://www.buymeacoffee.com/NightwatchN8
"The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun." Ecclesiastes 1:9
Kary Mullis excerpt: The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The âCorona Testâ Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus. Though Mullis has not been particularly vocal about his HIV skepticism, his convictions have not, to his credit, been muddled or softened by his recent success and mainstream acceptability. He seems to revel in his newly acquired power. âThey canât pooh-pooh me now, because of who I am,â he says with a chuckle â and by all accounts, heâs using that power effectively.
When ABCâs âNightlineâ approached Mullis about participating in a documentary on himself, he instead urged them to focus their attention on the HIV debate. âThatâs a much more important story,â he told the producers, who up to that point had never acknowledged the controversy. In the end, âNightlineâ ran a two-part series, the first on Kary Mullis, the second on the HIV debate. Mullis was hired by ABC for a two-week period, to act as their scientific consultant and direct them to sources.
The show was superb, and represented a historic turning point, possibly even the end of the seven-year media blackout on the HIV debate. But it still didnât fulfill Mullisâ ultimate fantasy. âWhat ABC needs to do,â says Mullis, âis talk to [Chairman of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr. Anthony] Fauci and [Dr. Robert] Gallo [one of the discoverers of HIV] and show that theyâre assholes, which I could do in ten minutes.â
But I point out, Gallo will refuse to discuss the HIV debate, just as heâs always done.
âI know he will,â Mullis shoots back, anger rising in his voice. âBut you know what? I would be willing to chase the little bastard from his car to his office and say, âThis is Kary Mullis trying to ask you a goddamn simple question,â and let the cameras follow. If people think Iâm a crazy person, thatâs okay. But hereâs a Nobel Prize-winner trying to ask a simple question from those who spent $22 billion and killed 100,000 people. It has to be on TV. Itâs a visual thing. Iâm not unwilling to do something like that.â
He pauses, then continues. âAnd I donât care about making an ass of myself because most people realize I am one.â
While many people, even within the ranks of the HIV dissidents, have of late tried to distance themselves from the controversial Duesberg, Mullis defends him passionately and seems genuinely concerned about his fate. âI was trying to stress this point to the ABC peopleâ he says, âthat Peter has been abused seriously by the scientific establishment, to the point where he canât even do any research. Not only that, but his whole life is pretty much in disarray because of this, and it is only because he has refused to compromise his scientific moral standards. There ought to be some goddamn private foundation in the country, that would say, âWell, weâll move in where the NIH [National Institutes of Health] dropped off. Weâll take care of it. You just keep right on saying what youâre saying, Peter. We think youâre an asshole, and we think you are wrong, but youâre the only dissenter, and we need one, because itâs science, itâs not religion.â And that was one of the reasons why I cooperated with ABC.â
âI am waiting to be convinced that weâre wrong,â Mullis continues. âI know it ainât going to happen. But if it does, I will tell you this much â I will be the first person to admit it. A lot of people studying this disease are looking for the clever little pathways they can piece together, that will show how this works. Like, âWhat if this molecule was produced by this one and then this one by this one, and then what if this one and that one induces this oneâ â that stuff becomes, after two molecules, conjecture of the rankest kind. People who sit there and talk about it donât realize that molecules themselves are somewhat hypothetical, and that their interactions are more so, and that the biological reactions are even more so. You donât need to look that far. You donât discover the cause of something like AIDS by dealing with incredibly obscure things. You just look at what the hell is going on. Well, hereâs a bunch of people that are practicing a new set of behavioral norms. Apparently, it didnât work because a lot of them got sick. Thatâs the conclusion. You donât necessarily know why it happened. But you start there.â
Tip the Host
⌿ https://paypal.me/nightwatchpodcast
More links
⌿ https://www.youtube.com/NIGHTWATCHN8
⌿ https://www.SOUNDCLOUD.com/THENIGHTWATCHPODCAST
⌿ https://gab.com/NIGHTWATCHN8
Category | News & Politics |
Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
Playing Next
Related Videos
Russell Brand Promotes the Antichrist Religion đ
1Â day, 18Â hours ago
What's with all the Catholic Converts like Candace and Russell Brand?
2Â days, 16Â hours ago
Government is a Mafia Protection Racket
4Â days, 14Â hours ago
If God is FOR US who can be AGAINST us?
5Â days, 15Â hours ago
The Trump Trial vs. The BIG PICTURE
1Â week, 2Â days ago
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.