RF Info's Oliver Perceval Details Hidden Cancer Dangers of Mobile Data 5G & WiFi Microwave Radiation

Is radiofrequency radiation safe ?https://rfinfo.co.uk/is-radio-frequency-radiation-safe/In a nutshellNo. RFR can be called highly xenobiotic polarised pulse modulated radiation. The pulse modulated and polarised nature of man-made radiation causes a stress response in the cells. Our bodies are electric, they get stressed having to identify and react to constant non native information. Chronic adaptive and induced stress uses up many internal resources, resulting in a loss of vitality and a run down immune system. A diverse range of symptoms will show as a result of the loss of balance and health.Proven effects include: increased cancer risk, genetic damage, cellular stress, oxidation of cells, changes to the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, and neurological disorders.[i] Children and adolescents are particularly susceptible.Ronald Kostoff regarding immune system function “EMR acts as both a promoter/accelerator and initiator of adverse health effects.”[i] http://www.5gappeal.eu/about/ http://grassrootsinfo.org/emergingscience.php A clear list of health effects and related studiesFCC and Big Telco make Us the Dummies: Feb 2021Link to Health pageIn more detail4G+ refers to current upgrades under 6GHz frequency5G is mmWave from 6GHz up to 90GHz. It is a new technology, primarily to do with employing phased array and beam formed signals. This way of packaging and targeting the signal to the device at high frequency allows alot more capacity, but it also requires millions more antenna, and is of questionable value to the average mobile device user. The government claims that mmWave 5G is ‘safe’, so why have some countries banned it, with others following suit? In April 2019, the 5G internet roll-out was postponed in Brussels on health grounds. It has been halted in parts of Switzerland until independent studies can prove its safety. Councils in the UK and other parts of the world have also called for moratoriums. Governments and organizations that ban or warn against wireless technology History of warnings against wireless technology The UK Government, Public Health England (PHE) and the World Health Organisation (WHO) take their guidance from the ICNIRP (International Council for non-ionizing Radiation Protection). The ICNIRP do not acknowledge the harmful bio-effects of wireless radiation at non-thermal levels, as shown in studies. The ICNIRP is a self-appointed NGO, accused of conflicts of interest and loyalty to industry. The Court of Appeal of Turin ruled in 2020 that the ICNIRP could not be relied upon for meaningful guidelines. No studies on human health, wildlife or the environment have shown that chronic exposure to WiFi or 4G is safe. There is no research showing safety either from 5G alone, or from the combined exposure to 4G + 5G. Pre-market safety testing relevant to real life situations has not been done and post market research confirms this technology is not safe for public use or exposure.US Senator Blumenthal raises concerns on 5G wireless technology health risks at a Senate hearing 2019. Note: The industry claim there have been no studies carried out (which would indeed be reckless), however many hundreds have been carried out by the military and industry which show adverse health effects from RFR, and these can be extrapolated to 5G as well. In their 2020 article the IEEE (Institute if Electrical and Electronic Engineers say that 5G could be calamitous: “Electromagnetic Radiation Due to Cellular, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Technologies: How Safe Are We?“Due to the extremely high density of base stations (BSs), street light access points, separate indoor BSs, relays and Massive MIMO technology employed in 5G, a person will be exposed to very high levels of Power Flux Densitys (PFDs), whether he is indoors or outdoors, or whether or not he is using any wireless devices in close proximity.