Suggestions and thematic criticism of Jordan Hall. pt.2

responding primarily to this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2677&v=Dsrw7Sq0GGs

Part 1: https://youtu.be/MrpXC8vKksg

I want to also add a small note to emphasize something I touched on:

Having anyone introduce a pervasive model of coordination within a decentralized system, will automatically create a systemic hazard, which reestablishes an imperative to have a compatible platform to support an ongoing form of compatible mutual styles of structures within the decentralization. There are so many issues in decentralization, which would have to develop systems to both preserve decentralization while also some kind of system of transparent signalling and coordination: the only way to resolve these problems, is that it must be treated as a paradox, to get properly curated: which effectively can only be done within units of a vibrant political interaction; these issues are further compounded by vast inequality in the realm of prestige, human intelligence is itself a scarce commodity, to analogize this issue, if we lived in a society where some people were 50 times taller than the average, it would 'look' strange, but this is the level of vibrant differentiation we have within our population, and if we cannot preserve contract within a decentralized system, it will likely devolve into some cult of lowest-common-denominator edifice of slave-morality and group-think, where prestige will be limited within a narrow field of in-group security provision: without the correct calibration of 'enlightened' structures--- the negotiation of the nitty-gritty structure, and technology of how to forge agreement for those arrangements, are all overlooked by the sociological level of analysis.

original file names; combined: 2019 03 15 031326 4th Jordan hall and 3rd combined.