Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.
Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.
Report Content
We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.
Thank you for submitting your report
We will investigate and take the appropriate action.
Nevada County, CA Public Health Official Claims Health Officers Could Execute Unmasked On Sight!
DEMAND DR. SCOTT KELLERMAN's RESIGNATION by Emailing the Sample letter below to:
[email protected]
[email protected],
[email protected]
[email protected]
cc:
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
Sample Letter:
Dear Sheriff Moon, DA Jesse Wilson, and NCIS,
I DEMAND DR. SCOTT KELLERMAN's RESIGNATION!!!
I Demand a criminal investigation by Sheriff Moon and the DA in regards to the statements Dr. Kellerman made and possible coverup by Pascale of Yubanet!
I Demand that the Board of Supervisors remove Dr. Scott Kellerman immediately for making terrorists threats and violation of the Nuremberg Code!
Northern California County Public Health Officer, Dr. Scott Kellerman, insinuated people not wearing masks in the streets should be
SHOT DEAD by public health officers "with swift justice" like they did "during the Spanish Flu."
In the video above, Kellerman uses a "GASLIGHTING" technique, when, after gesturing the firing of a handgun at an unmasked civilian, he states
"we're not thinking about that, right Elena?" he then grins and chuckles -- sarcastically -- because he *IS* obviously thinking about it *AND* talking about it -- but *PRETENDING* that it is funny, meaningless, and non-threatening.
How can Kellerman think what he's stated is funny? Dr. Glennah Trochet, Nevada County deputy health officer is not much better...
How can Dr. Kellermans's statement in this "public video" NOT BE perceived as a "VEILED THREAT?"
I certainly do not feel safe after hearing Kellerman's statements!
The original video was pulled from Youtube and Yubanet shortly after it started to go viral. Pascale of Yubanet is the devious snake who
pulled the video from both Yubanet and Youtube! This is unacceptable and constitutes criminal behavior by a public servant under
California and US law.
I have a duty under the law cited below to report Dr. Kellerman!
18 U.S. Code § 4 - Misprision of felony | U.S. Code | US ...
Search Domain: law.cornell.edu - https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/4
Section 4. Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does
not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States shall be
fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
“Under California Penal Code Section 422 PC, it is illegal to make criminal threats. ... To prove that someone is guilty of making criminal threats,
a prosecutor must be able to establish the following elements: The defendant willfully threatened to unlawfully kill or unlawfully cause great bodily
injury to another person.”
California Penal Code Section 422 PC, it is illegal to make criminal threats.
This offense was previously called “terrorist threats,” however it can involve any threats of violence or harm.
To prove that someone is guilty of making criminal threats, a prosecutor must be able to establish the following elements:
The defendant willfully threatened to unlawfully kill or unlawfully cause great bodily injury to another person
The defendant made the threat orally, in writing, or via electronic communication
The defendant intended that his or her statement be understood as a threat
The threat was so clear, immediate, unconditional, and specific that it communicated to the other person a serious intention and the
immediate prospect that the threat would be carried out
The threat actually caused the other person to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for the safety of his or her immediate family
AND the other person’s fear was reasonable under the circumstances.
Someone who intends that a statement be understood as a threat does not have to actually intend to carry out the threatened act, or intend to
have someone else do it. An immediate ability to carry out the threat is not required.
Category | News & Politics |
Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
Playing Next
Related Videos
Calvin Clark addresses the Nevada county assembly
2 years, 4 months ago
2 years, 4 months ago
BURN YOUR MASK RALLY - March 27, 2021
3 years ago
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.