Abortion: If One Individual Has No Right Over Another, Why Does Government Assume Such?

The government needs children for their illicit sex rings and now they have a way to get them. Your daughter gets pregnant, it's illegal to have an abortion and the baby is given up for adoption, but the mother doesn't know that this child will be put into a sex ring to service members of Congress. The blood of this child will be drunk in a Satanic ritual. All these children have hearts, livers, kidneys, lungs and so they will supply the rulers with body organs. Hillary was in that business and so was Dyncorp. George Webb reported on it for months. I watched. What reason does government have to interfere in the private decisions made by families? Are they trying to break up the family unit? What use do we have for the government or the Supreme Court? Unconstitutional laws? Interference in private affairs? How about totalitarian control over people? Do anti-abortionists care what happens when the child is brought into the world? Who has to support this child when those who call a fetus a 'baby' waltz off into the sunset? Who is going to feed that child, educate it, celebrate birthdays? If the child's heart or liver is taken, nobody is going to be at the birthday party, because the child will be dead.