OOPS! THE BABYSITTERS OF INFORMATION HAVE CONTRADICTED THEMSELVES ON MALE CIRCUMCISION!

Oops! The babysitters of information have contradicted themselves on male mutilation with the blips that google has pop up.These aren`t even articles that are linked to, these are informative blips. If you search why they circumcize men in Islam, google has contradicted themselves. Whilst in other places they say that it`s a health practice in the U.S. to cut off the foreskin and make searches favorable that suggest this, they also say that it`s pseudo-science for Islam to claim it`s for health and this is only meant to justify a religious practice. By keeping certain studies at bay, and favoring others, as well as all the blips that pop up on the screen giving googe´s own opinion, they present the debate in a way that favors certain viewpoints. So there is a contradiction bewteen the blips that pop up when it comes to Islam, and the large body of very biased links you get to when you search for why this is done in the United States. It`s only when talking about male circumcision from the point of view of Islam that google and the babysitters of information question Islam`s health claims, but then they turn around and justify those same health claims on the basis of the American tradition of doing this.This is merely the start of a huge massive bunch of contradictions on this theme that justify shockingly disgraceful acts! If it`s really true that there is no medical basis for male circumcision when it comes to Islam, why do those same babysitters of information, google and their informative blips, then make searches that justify this in the U.S. The same practice is bogus in Islam but justified in the U.S.