You are about to action:

Object being modified by the action

Do you want to proceed?

Share Video Link

https://www.bitchute.com/video/M24lRYVk3kcc/

Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.

Embed Video HTML

Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.

Share to Social Media

Share to social media by clicking on the quick share links.

Report Content

Reason

Please select the most appropriate reason from the list provided.

Note: For a more detailed description of each reason, see our Community Guidelines.

Additional Comments

Please add any additonal comments that will help with the assessment of your request.

Note: Copyright claims must contain all the items specified within the Copyright Policy.

Email Submissions

We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.

Thank you for submitting your report

We will investigate and take the appropriate action.

Add to Playlist

Fossil Dating Methods: Assumptions Result in Wrong Dates

Next video playing soon

Click to cancel

Autoplay has been paused

Click to watch next video

First published at 13:59 UTC on December 22nd, 2020.

#fossils
#fossildating
#humanfossils

SciencePastor

subscribers

Your platform for uncensored ideas. BitChute Premium.

BitChute Advertisement

We are looking at the Smithsonians's human origins web site. They claim evolution is shown to be true by the dating of human fossils. They talk about paleomagnetism, biochronology and molecular clock as proven dating methods... but all three of these are based on the assumption evolution is true. What they are saying is, based on evolution being true, we know evolution is true. Don't accept that. It's a bunch of nonsense.

For more information and links to our related web pages and videos, go to http://www.SciencePastor.com/evidence3

LESS