Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.
Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.
Report Content
We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.
Thank you for submitting your report
We will investigate and take the appropriate action.
EARTH IS NOT MOVING, PERIOD! - EXPLAINED
Do you really think it's possible that we are moving in FOUR SIMULTANEOUS CURVED LINEAR PATHS at FOUR varying speeds, AT THE SAME TIME, as "they" claim we are? AND NOT FEEL IT or even MEASURE it? Really!?!?
It would be like spinning in a chair which is inside a corkscrew roller coaster which is inside 2 other corkscrew roller coasters - because that's what "they" CLAIM is literally happening to earth. We've been hoodwinked my friends. Let me explain in more detail:
All the math included below.
Let's state the FACTS and do the repeatable math shall we:
According to 'glober' CLAIMS; At the equator:
- The directions of gravity and the alleged centrifugal force would be opposite.
- So the alleged centrifugal force would only have a vertical component and would be canceled out by the gravity force acting vertically down.
- The CLAIMED Centrifugal force that SHOULD be generated and measured from the CLAIMED earth 'spin' of 1037.5 mph, SHOULD produce an acceleration of 0.0339141 m/s^2
- The effect should be simply a slight but MEASURABLE reduction in the 'gravity' acceleration from 9.81 m/s^2 to 9.77 m/s^2.
- Which should cause a MEASURABLE weight reduction at the equator of 0.35%.
At 45 degrees Latitude NORTH:
- Gravity is allegedly acting towards the center of the mass of the alleged ball earth.
- Centrifugal force would be acting perpendicular to the claimed AXIS of rotation.
- These directions are NOT opposite.
- The direction of the alleged centrifugal acceleration SHOULD be at 45 degrees towards the south.
- And SHOULD cause a reduction in weight of 0.172929 %.
- And more importantly should measure an acceleration of 0.016957 m/s^2 in the direction SOUTH.
Now, for a projectile in free fall, (say in a vacuum). 100 meters ( fall time 4.51 seconds )
That SHOULD cause a deflection of :
d = .5 * acceleration * time ^ 2
d = 0.5 * 0.016957 * 4.51^2
d = 0.172454 meters
d = 17.2454 cm
BUT, there is ZERO measurable EXPECTED deviation when tested. Oops!
Check the math:
Gravitational acceleration (m/s^2) = -9.80576
Latitude (degrees) = 45
Velocity (mph) = 735.64
Centrifugal acceleration (m/s^2) = 0.0239809
Gravity Direction Vector = (0.707107, 0.707107)
Centrifugal Direction Vector = (1, 0)
Combined acceleration = (-6.90974,-6.93372)
Combined acceleration (relative to ground) = (0.016957,-9.7888)
Weight reduction (%) compared to North pole = 0.172929
Projectile drop (time=4.51 seconds) Deflection south (cm) = 17.2454
Digital Inclinometers based on MEMS accelerometer technology.
- See reference (1)
- Accurate to 0.0001 degrees (<1 arcsecond)
- Used to determine the "reference level point" or "zero level"
- The planar position tangent to center of mass of the earth.
- These leveling devices make no allowance for latitude.
- Centrifugal force MUST affect ALL masses and therefore MUST affect the result produced by an accelerometer.
Using the combined Gravity and Centrifugal force vector at 45 degrees latitude.
(0.016957,-9.7888)
The angle relative to earth "center of mass" would be:
Arccos ( 9.7888 / sqrt (0.01657^2 + (-9.7888)^2) ) = 0.09925257042 = ¬0.1 degrees
Using earth radius = 3963 miles
Then (0.1 degrees) would produce
tan(0.1) * 3963 miles = 6.9 miles (SOUTH of the true center of mass)
SO , to conclude.
- These devices SHOULD produce the WRONG result at every latitude except the equator/north pole.
- The amount of error is WELL beyond the accuracy of the device.
- This ERROR would not occur with GPS (which is not gravity based ) so there would be an obvious discrepancy.
No my friends, Four simultaneous curved paths (also in different out of phase trajectories) and various extreme speeds as previously stated; even star trails would have detectable and quite visible variations OTHER than perfect arcs and their individual ends could NEVER perfectly meet in a 360 degree turn. THINK! That's not just empirical fact, it's good sense.
CONCLUSION: Earth is not moving. (It's not a "globe"(round) either - but all that is in my playlist...)
Category | None |
Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
Playing Next
VIRUSES DO NOT EXIST, PERIOD! 72777 [BANNED on youtube, FB, TWITTER...ETC.]
2 years, 11 months ago
Related Videos
Control the Food, Control the People-Simple as that
6 months, 3 weeks ago
The Ephraim Awakening Part 2 - Should We Obey God - 7772666
1 year, 5 months ago
The Ephraim Awakening Part 1 - Who Is The Church - 7772666
1 year, 5 months ago
Elon Musk Tweets Flat Earth Poll - 656565
1 year, 7 months ago
Debunking the Nonsense(of virology) - Dr. Jordan Grant - 72777
1 year, 7 months ago
Why the Truth about Our Reality Matters - 656565
1 year, 8 months ago
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.