First published at 00:31 UTC on May 13th, 2024.
(Vid posted is from over a month ago by James Roguski. but it is a testament that peoples actions are negatively affecting the WHO!)
Eleven nations informed the UN General Assembly they were not going along with the UN’s support for the WHO Pandemic …
MORE
(Vid posted is from over a month ago by James Roguski. but it is a testament that peoples actions are negatively affecting the WHO!)
Eleven nations informed the UN General Assembly they were not going along with the UN’s support for the WHO Pandemic Preparedness Agenda last September. In alphabetical order:
Belarus
Bolivia
Cuba
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
Eritrea
Islamic Republic of Iran
Nicaragua
Russian Federation
Syrian Arab Republic
Venezuela
Zimbabwe
The Netherlands’ government has been instructed to delay the WHO votes or vote No by the lower house of Parliament.
Slovakia said it will not sign current drafts of both documents.
Croatia’s new majority party is against the WHO’s pandemic preparedness plan
Italy’s Senator Borghi said Italy will vote No on the treaty and furthermore that there are 10 more months in which to reject the IHR Amendments.
It is very unusual to have this level of disagreement made public even before the start of the World Health Assembly meeting. And with “hybrid negotiations” aka backroom horse-trading, leading right up to the meeting, nobody will have time to consider the treaties before they are due to be voted on. It has been a corrupt process from start to finish. It could only succeed with stealth (no one knowing what is really in the treaties) and bribes.
Now that the US has announced that 100 countries are being paid off to develop their pandemic preparedness agenda, will the bribes be enough to get these treaties across the finish line? Will the unbribed be miffed? How much will it cost the US taxpayer for the world’s nations to agree to dictatorial control of pandemics and health information going forward?
LESS