You are about to action:

Object being modified by the action

Do you want to proceed?

Share Video Link

https://www.bitchute.com/video/U8LNFjFyGU8/

Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.

Embed Video HTML

Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.

Share to Social Media

Share to social media by clicking on the quick share links.

Report Content

Reason

Please select the most appropriate reason from the list provided.

Note: For a more detailed description of each reason, see our Community Guidelines.

Additional Comments

Please add any additonal comments that will help with the assessment of your request.

Note: Copyright claims must contain all the items specified within the Copyright Policy.

Email Submissions

We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.

Thank you for submitting your report

We will investigate and take the appropriate action.

Add to Playlist

Was Hitler a Strong or Weak Dictator? Intentionalist vs Functionalist/Structuralist Debate

Next video playing soon

Click to cancel

Autoplay has been paused

Click to watch next video

First published at 18:47 UTC on November 25th, 2019.

TIK

subscribers

BitChute Advertisement

There was a huge debate between historians regarding whether Hitler was a Strong or Weak dictator. The Intentionalist historians said his dictatorship was strong, and that he gave orders that the divided and weak State carried out. And the Structuralist/Functionalist historians said that he was a weak dictator, and that the divided State structure was what actually drove the events that we saw happen during the Third Reich. Today, we're going to discuss this and see how this debate was 'solved', and how it might be time to dig it up again...

I'm not a Fascist or anything similar, nor am I promoting said ideologies. This video is discussing events or concepts that are academic, educational and historical in nature. This video is for informational purposes and was created so we may better understand the past and learn from the mistakes others have made.

Today's question comes from Guy Andrews - Hi Tik, in regards to the Nazi State and the inner-workings of the state itself, would you regard yourself as being an 'intentationalist' or a 'structuralist' in the historical debate?

If you would like to ask a question, please consider supporting me on either Patreon or SubscribeStar and help make more videos like this possible. For $5 or more you can ask questions which I will answer in future Q&A videos. Thank you to my current Patrons! You're AWESOME! https://www.patreon.com/TIKhistory or https://www.subscribestar.com/tikhistory

Videos EVERY Monday at 5pm GMT (depending on season, check for British Summer Time).

- - - - -

BIBLIOGRAPHY / SOURCES

Relevant Articles to this debate -

https://revisingtheholocaust.blogspot.com/2014/05/intentionalist-vs-structuralist-debate.html
http://shshistory.com/extra%20pages/AAAHitler;%20the%20intentionalist%20and%20functionalist.pdf
http://www.public.asu.edu/~acichope/FWA_Readings/Richard%20Bessel,%20Functionalists%20vs%20Intentionalists.pdf
https://www.holocaustcentre.org.nz/uploads/1/1/5/2/115245341/interpretations-of-the-holoca..

LESS