Copied from https://youtu.be/SP4PFbt3qgM
I found out about Pyasa through Jeff Berwick: https://www.bitcoinnewsline.com/jeff-berwick/healing-the-hidden-wound-circumcision-with-pyasa/
Jeff says, "The angriest I had ever been about a single issue."
What is called circumcision today actually is radical circumcision, meaning it's a radicalized procedure that is not comparable to forms before the current rabbinic radicalization.
See http://www.cirp.org/library/history/
"In contrast to the Jews, the Greeks and the Romans placed a high value on the prepuce..3 34 The Romans passed several laws to protect the prepuce by prohibiting circumcision.3 34 The laws were applied to everyone and were not directed against the Jews.3
Much later in the Hellenic period, about 140 C.E., the Jewish authorities modified circumcision procedure to make it impossible for a Jew to appear to be an uncircumcised Greek.10,11,20,30 A radical new procedure called peri'ah was introduced by the priests and rabbis. In this procedure the foreskin was stripped away from the glans, with which it is fused in the infant (See Normal.) In a painful procedure known today as a synechotomy, more foreskin was removed than before and the injury was correspondingly greater. With the introduction of peri'ah, the glans could not easily be recovered, and so no Jewish male would easily be able to appear as an uncircumcised Greek.10,11,20,31 This radical modified procedure eventually was adopted by the medical profession and is the circumcision operation used today."
I have many uploads on radical circumcision, MGM, and foreskin. This upload is meant to be a brief introduction.
Some commentary that will address any comments left below:
I woke up to this when still a teen when I realized the best portions of my genitalia would have been amputated were I "circumcised" like so many others. If you're interested in exploring further, I have many uploads on this subject, and in most of the uploads I included lots of information and links.
My genitalia developed properly because the fused foreskin was not tampered with by a medical quack. I can't speak for other men.
Lawrence Newman says:
"Forced genital mutilation of males is no different than forced genital mutilation of females. It has been proven via histological analysis that essentially all the erogenous nerves of the penis are located in the ridged band and frenular delta of the foreskin, both of which are cut off. I was circumcised for pseudomedical reasons by the NHS in the UK when I was 14 and it destroyed my sexual pleasure completely. The glans penis is almost non-erogenous in character. It's like the eyeball--covered in crude free nerves that detect pain and pressure. That's all the circumcised man's left with. Unfortunately many people have bought the baseless folk theory that the glans penis and glans clitoris are the primary sexual organs. This is untrue and no histological evidence exists to back this up.
Forced circumcision is the most disgusting, despicable act you could do to someone. It's objectively worse than rape--it is non-consensual but it is also irreversible and damages you for life. I have PTSD/depression over it and have sworn off women because sex is pointless. Imagine how many boys and men commit suicide, get depression/PTSD or end up murdering people due to this horrific crime."
He also says, "Women can still orgasm after type 2 FGM. The external genitalia are not needed for orgasm. A woman experiences pleasure during penetrative sex, obviously. A man with no foreskin can't feel pleasure, because all the sexual sensation is in the foreskin. The glans penis of the male is almost sexually insensitive."
"Male circumcision has always been about sexual suppression of males. And circumcised men have lost the most sensitive parts of their penis. Where is your evidence they enjoy sex? Because these men have sex, can get erection ergo they must enjoy it? No, these men have never known what foreskin feels like. I can tell you, having experienced both, that circumcision kills pleasure dead. A woman's glans clitoris is a small part of her sexual apparatus and she can enjoy sex without it via penetrative sex. A man without a foreskin can't enjoy sex because he has no ridge band and frenular delta. The glans penis is virtually sexually insensitive. IGNORANCE."
I got that from the description here: "Circumcision Discussion with My Sister - AshAllDay" https://www.bitchute.com/video/U1UOCfjXjEh1/
I had many quotes saved on one of those text sites, but the contents have since been removed. There also used to be a very active circumcision/MGM forum with a plethora of valuable information, and it was fully hacked and purged. Male circumcision/MGM is a heavily censored and lied about topic.
However, I'm sure much valuable material still remains in my #CIRCUMCISION #MGM #FORESKIN and #INTACTIVISM sections.
Share any valuable thoughts and insights.
