Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.
Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.
Report Content
We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.
Thank you for submitting your report
We will investigate and take the appropriate action.
The Syrian Conflict Deception.
The Western MSM reporting of the violence in Syria is best described as the Syrian conflict deception. Nothing we have been told about the conflict in Syria is true. The origins of the conflict aren't as we led to believe, it's precursors are radically different from what we've been told; the nature of the conflict is not a 'civil war' as our media have tried to convince us and many of the events during the conflicted have been misreported, distorted or have simply been 'fake news.'
However, while war propaganda is nothing new, the public scrutiny afforded by the Internet renders the deception painfully transparent for those who choose to look.
Initially we were told that the U.S Led coalition's 'response' in Syria arose following please from peaceful 'opposition' activists brutally attacked by President Bashar al Assads forces, the Syrian Arab Army (SAA.) However, as this video reveals the plan for 'regime' change in Syria was at least a decade old and was yet another attempt by the West to install the government of its choice in the country. The Testimony of General's Wesley Clarke and former French Foreign minister Roland Dumas makes the long standing Anglo-American plan to oust the Ba'ath party from power clear.
Further testimony from Major General Anwar Al Eshki show that the Saudi's were arming militants in the al Omari Mosque in Deraa where the violence began. This corroborated SAA claims that the violence did not erupt simply because they opened fire on unarmed protestors but rather because they were engaged in a gun battle with militant groups already in place. It is also clear, according to the testimony of General Michael T. Flynn, that the U.S administration made a 'wilful decision' to arm Islamist groups inside Syria in the full knowlwedge that this would likely lead to the creation of a 'Salafist principality. Islamic State in other words.
So was this all just a monumental cock up, as claimed by the Western coalition and their allies? Or does it evidence a committed plan to use Islamist terrorist groups to destabalise a target country for geopolitical, strategic and financial gain?
Category | News & Politics |
Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
Playing Next
Related Videos
2 years, 5 months ago
James Corbett Interviews Iain Davis
2 years, 5 months ago
Whitney Webb Interviews Iain Davis Part 2
2 years, 5 months ago
Whitney Webb Interviews Iain Davis Part 1
2 years, 5 months ago
Matt Hancock Pretending To Cry On National Television
3 years, 4 months ago
3 years, 5 months ago
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.