There are two good things about Censorship. It might be surprising for some in the audience to hear me say this … those who are aware of what I spoke about in the previous video concerning Free Speech, but I ask you to hear me out.
The first good thing to say about Censorship is that it gives us an indication of the efforts that are required to suppress the Truth (whatever the Truth might be). The more Censorship that is put in place, the more concerned they, our Overlords, are about the Truth getting out.
Seeing things from their point of view, they fear us, the ordinary people of the world, knowing the Truth about what they have been doing for the past however many decades – their Machiavellian machinations to do with the Media, Economics and Politics etc etc.
And, so as the Truth starts to come out, they therefore necessarily become more fearful of our response. Hence the more measures that they then put in place to counter that emergence. So, essentially, the harder they suppress, the more fearful they are.
In some respects then, we can say that Censorship acts as a relatively reliable indicator of their levels of fear. So, the Censorship is a “fearmometer”.
And, if I am reading the fearmometer correctly, it would seem that our Overlords are fairly fearful at present because the Truth is slowly, but surely coming out.
My guess is that they’re actually fighting a losing battle because, as the old adage goes, “the truth will out eventually”.
So, we can use the level of Censorship to gauge their fear - that’s the first good thing to say about Censorship.
The second good thing to say about Censorship is that it gives us an indication of the health of a nation. To state this in reverse, it’s an indicator of how sick the nation is. Because, as far as I’m concerned, in a healthy, free and open society, there is no Censorship – in terms of Free Speech - none whatsoever.
Indeed, Free Speech is, to my way of thinking, the very hallmark of a healthy, free and open society.
I would venture to say then that our society is in pretty poor health at present.
Be that as it may, perhaps this is not necessarily such a bad thing - in one respect at any rate.
Again, this might be surprising for some in the audience to hear me say this. So, why do I say this? Well, because more people then might realise that the nation is sick in some way, and then, they might be that bit more likely to want something to be done about it.
I very much doubt that they will react with any kind of revolutionary fervour. And I don’t even think most people will actually get actively involved, but at least they might be willing to lend their support to any actions that they see others are taking.
And that then maybe is all that is required to tip the balance in favour of change.
Those people who are spearheading the change really only need have the support of the masses to do what needs to be done.
Although, I should perhaps qualify this by saying that of course, t
