NAZI = ASHKENAZI = JEW
1. Most Ashkenazim are not from Germany. They have roots in Eastern Europe, a group of them in Germany sure.
2. Term Ashkenazim has been used way, way, way before Hitler was a fetus.
3. The main way someone can be a fake Jew is if their mom is not Jewish and they never formally converted. Yeah, neither are the case with most Ashkenazim.
4. There are more Jewish groups than just Ashkenazim and Mizrahim. If you want to argue Ashkenazim are not Jews because the name consists ‘nazi’(which is just the English version for a Hebrew word, like Sephardim is originated from the Hebrew word for Spain ‘ספרד׳’ or Sfarad)
The Twelve Tribes Of Israel In Genesis 49 And Deuteronomy 33 8-12
JUDAH…Sephardim, Ibo, Mandingo 1 3,4
REUBEN…Aborigines of Australia, Pacific
6 5-7
SIMEON…Yoruba, Fulani, Maasi 26-28 5-2
LEVI…Falasha, Ashanti, Zulu 8-11 16-18
DAN…Sakai of Indonesia, Malay, Japan 22 21
NAPTHALI…Micronesia, Polynesia 23 19
GAD…AmericanIndians, Hmong,Tibetans
20,21 20
ASHER…South America, Hispanics 24,25 14,15
ISSACHAR…Central America, Mexico 18,19 13
ZEBULON…Philippines, Sai/Li 18,19 22-26
EPHRAIM…Negritos ofAsia, Yusufzai13-12 2z
MANASSEH…Shinlung, ChiangMin, Karen 13 17
BENJAMIN…Pathans, Kashmiri 12 The three sons of noah
JAPHET = Asians…Genesis 10:2
HAM = North Africans…Genesis 10:6
SHEM = Mid-East, Europe, India…Genesis 10:21
Why doesn’t Russia make a big deal about its role in liberating Nazi Holocaust death camps?
The documentary Night will Fall tells the story of German Concentration Camps Factual Survey, a film made by the Allied forces who filmed the scenes of the Nazi concentration camps as they liberated them.
The film was intended to be shown to the German public immediately after World War II, but could not be finished. The part that was not completed depicted the camps of Majdanek and Auschwitz, liberated by the Soviet Red Army and filmed by Soviet camera crews. The Soviets’ role in liberating those camps, and the newsreels they made about them, became problematic for the British team making the documentary as the Soviet Union moved from being seen as a wartime ally to a Cold War adversary.
Only now has the film been restored. But even today, the Soviet section posed the Imperial War Museum team in the UK a challenge. They had to overcome the proliferation of confusion and myths about the Soviets’ liberation of the Nazi camps, because the footage contradicted the dominant Western view of the war and the Holocaust.
Soviet liberators
This confusion is evident in a recent article by Anthony Beevor, the popular British historian. In it he claims that the reports the Soviets published about Majdanek did not mention Jewish victims. But they did. Beevor also erroneously claims that the Soviets released no details about the liberation of Auschwitz until after the war. In fact, the Communist Party daily newspaper Pravda published an article about Auschwitz shortly after its capture by the Red Army in January 1945.
These kinds of distortions are often simply due to careless scholarship. But in some cases they are indicative of the difficulty in assimilating the place of the Soviet Union, and of Russia, with our Western understanding of the Holocaust – as history’s warning of extremism and the need for democracy. The Soviets’ role in the war and in the liberation of the camps is distorted and even ignored because it is an inconvenience to this Western understanding.
It is in this context that we should view the row about Russian representation at the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz. Vladimir Putin will not go – and it appeared he had deliberately snubbed the event (although now Putin’s chief of staff, Sergei Ivanov will attend the ceremony).
The controversy was further stoked by Polish and Ukrainian politicians claiming that it was not Russians but Ukrainians who liberated the camp. Wrong again. The Red Army was organised into fronts with geographical designations (such as the 1st Ukrainian front, the troops that liberated Auschwitz). These names, however, do not refer to the ethnic composition of the units, which were dominated, as was the Red Army as a whole, by Russians.
The political purpose of arguing that it was not Russians, but Ukrainians who liberated the camp is evidently coloured by the conflict in eastern Ukraine. For the Poles and Ukrainians, Russia’s role in defeating Nazism and liberating the camps undermines the narrative of Russia as the aggressor. It’s therefore desirable to write this aspect out of history and forget it.
A different perspective
The problem is that it’s quite easy to whitewash this particular history, because Russia doesn’t actually seem to be that concerned with remembering its role. Despite the fact that it was the Red Army…
https://theconversation.com/why-doesnt-russia-make-a-big-deal-about-its-role-in-liberating-nazi-holocaust-death-camps-36538
