Uploaded in 2015
In its 2019 Impact Report, Impossible Foods — maker of the Impossible Burger, a meat substitute using GMO soy — takes aim directly at regenerative ranching, claiming grass fed cattle ranching generates higher amounts of greenhouse …
Uploaded in 2015
In its 2019 Impact Report, Impossible Foods — maker of the Impossible Burger, a meat substitute using GMO soy — takes aim directly at regenerative ranching, claiming grass fed cattle ranching generates higher amounts of greenhouse gas emissions than cows raised in CAFOs.
What the report fails to include is evidence showing grass fed ranching actually has net negative emissions after all relevant factors are taken into account.
A life-cycle analysis (LCA) — performed by the same company that conducted Impossible Burger’s LCA — reveals the carbon footprint of beef from White Oak Pastures is 111% lower than conventional CAFO beef, as the “system effectively captures soil carbon, offsetting a majority of the emissions related to beef production”.
Regenerative grazing is a key activity required for the optimal sequestering of carbon-dioxide from the atmosphere into our rangelands and pasturelands, while GMO soy production is associated with resistant super weeds and super pests and uncontrollable cross contamination.
According to the latest forecast by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, a dead zone the size of Massachusetts may develop in the Gulf this summer, thanks to heavy rains washing agricultural chemicals off farmland.
Subscribe for FREE to the latest health news: https://bit.ly/3nuOvoP
Website: https://bit.ly/3zhdkau
Podcast: https://bit.ly/3zeWk4x
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/doctor.health/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/drmercola
Twitter: https://twitter.com/mercola
Telegram: https://t.me/DoctorMercola
Truth: https://truthsocial.com/@Mercola
Gab: https://gab.com/Mercola
Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/mercola
Mewe: https://mewe.com/p-front/dr.josephmercola
