https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/we-call-investigations-bill-melinda-gates-foundation-medical-malpractice-crimes-against-humanity
This is an old segment from CBS '60 Minutes' on the swine flu (also known as H1N1) & the vaccine that was developed.
There is inconsistency with what they say, and their story does not hang together with itself. We must utilize logical and scientific analysis with this situation. If their claims are reduced to absurdity, we have a moral duty to ignore them. They claim this virus is airborne, and yet tell people to socially distance and wear basic surgeons masks as if that would help against airborne particulates. Those masks only help protect against droplet (say it, don't spray it), and if wearing a mask, you should be able to give people hugs. You'd not need to worry about hugging, even without a mask, as long as the person doesn't sneeze or cough on your face. If it were airborne, with a hang time of a few minutes, a person could be a football field away, and you could still inhale this micro-particulate. And when it eventually settled to a physical surface, surfaces would be contaminated. This means (if they were consistent), grocery stores would not be open (even sanitizing all food items every hour would not be good enough), every animal (squirrel, raccoon, bird, deer, BATS, etc) in the wild would need to be caught and tested, and you'd not be allowed to breath if you live in a big city like NYC (the solution is to just stop breathing or die, because you aren't allowed to move). Also, once you test the animals in the wild or pets, you may have just transmitted it to the animal (because you can supposedly transmit unknowingly while not having any symptoms), and therefore, we just need to kill every animal in the wild, sanitize sidewalks and lawns, etc ( as once it settles outside, the wind could kick it back up in airborne mode). This is nothing more than irrational fear used to control people, at any time, as supposed new strains of this or that boogeyman can arise and even without symptoms, you can supposedly be an international threat to humanity, for just existing, UNLESS you COMPLY... And if it is not airborne, and just droplet transmissible, then just have everyone wear a mask when closer than 6 feet to each other (for a few months). Shutting down society is not only illogical, and unscientific, but immoral (way more suffering and death will happen due to shutting down, than even the contrived numbers they attribute to the oogie boogie virus.
This brings me to another issue I have, in how they supposedly knew there was an outbreak at all. With such a basic symptomology of cough, fever, and weakness, and in more severe cases, shortness of breath, there would have never been any way for them to know the origin or source of this supposed organism. There would be no way to know of “patient zero.” There would have to likely be 1/2 a million or more cases worldwide before there’d be enough of a red flag raised in order to dig deeper and find out what is going on. The umbrella of diagnosis is large enough to cover several hundred thousand extra deaths with flu, pneumonia, etc, without any suspicious warrant to bring in groups like WHO or CDC. That they supposedly “know” the source being a Market in Wuhan and bat soup, is tremendously suspect and doesn’t line up with the reality of the details of our normal operations of things. Add to this, that for all I’ve been taught in my nursing school microbiology classes, etc, separating us (social distancing) will only make this problem more drawn out and lengthy. Herd immunity is a principle which encourages us to mingle, so that people who have stronger immune systems produce autoimmunity through exposure and then become zero threat to those with compromised immune systems. So why in the hell aren’t we just recommending to have the very aged or those with immune dysfunction, to stay socially distanced or to wear a mask? Hmmm...
