INCREDIBLY GOOD interview with the great Sasha Latypova! This contains what is possibly the best explanation I’ve heard for what happened with the implementation of the Covid pandemic. The entire thing about a dangerous, infectious virus was a cover-story for the deployment of a biological/chemical weapon in specific places. Listen to the evidence from Sasha Latypova!
“This month’s special live stream for my paid subscribers was with Sasha Latypova, a retired pharma R&D executive. However, due to the importance of the content I have decided to make it available for everyone. Frankly, everyone should listen to this podcast and understand the true nature of the Covid plandemic and what its true agenda is.”
Source: https://rumble.com/v4k9gzi-152-sasha-latypova-on-the-covid-19-pandemic-and-its-underlying-agenda.html
(Loose) transcription:
Sasha Latypova:
“I speak of it as a ‘chemical.’ First of all, nobody can create a virus in a lab — that’s if you believe in viruses in the first place. I can speak in either language (whether viruses actually exist or not). I believe that this is an area of science [virology] that’s being greatly falsified and needs proper research before we can answer those questions.
“But in any case, whatever they propagandize us with in those shows and on TV telling you, oh, there’s this virus that they can engineer in a lab is false. Nobody can engineer that in a lab. What they’re doing in a lab is called small molecule drugs, they are under 900 daltons in molecular weight. And they are stable. They’re fairly straightforward to synthesize and manufacture.
“They can’t make anything live and self-spreading, but they CAN make a bunch of chemicals that are poisonous and essentially transmissible because you can also formulate things that can be passed through the skin, inhaled, ingested — what’s called “shedding.” Shedding is definitely real with these things, so once you have toxins in your body, your body is going to start trying to eliminate them and you’re going to “shed” — in your sweat, your saliva, your skin, your excrement. That’s what shedding is. So depending on how large those pieces (molecules) are, what broke off and how you process them, they can be more dangerous or less dangerous for whoever is around you. Secondary cases of poisoning have been documented with a number of substances, including “Marburg” for example. But secondary cases are always less dangerous [than the original poisonings]. That’s why all kinds of epidemics or outbreaks of anything always self-extinguish — because the secondary and tertiary [cases] are always much less dangerous than the primary.
“Doc Malik” (summing up) says:
“We are sympathetic to the no virus camp although we’re going to sit on the fence. We think that a lot of what people say about viruses and how they’re “isolated” and “grown” is actually bullshit and it’s a fraudulent science. But maybe we’re not going to jump and say there’s no such thing as viruses because we’re just going to leave that for a moment — but basically, we’re sympathetic.”
Sasha Latypova answers:
“What I can say about that is that I agree with researchers like the Baileys and Tom Cowan when they criticize virology — I think virology is a fake science. It’s a TOTALLY fake science — it’s also evil — it’s just designed to mass-poison people under the pretense of these idiotic things. And their critiques [of virology] are completely valid.
“There is no replacement right now to the virus theory and they’re not offering any — they’re concentrating on showing that the virus theory is invalid. So just the knowledge that virology is fraudulent is valuable, but it’s not the complete answer [to the phenomenon of contagion and diseases]. A complete answer needs to be developed using proper science, and we don’t have proper science in that area.
“Now whether viruses exist or not, I know that nucleic sequences exist and that we emit them. [The question is, do these nucleic sequences have the origin, properties and characteristics (such as “hijacking the cell’s biology to replicate”) that current virology considers dogma]. Our bodies emit all sorts of signals, including chemical, which can be RNA and DNA sequences coming out in lipid envelopes. You could call them “viruses,” but not in the manner that virology assumes — the properties that virology dogma attributes to these particles has never been proven.
They’re signals — they’re signals from the body, whether good or bad — this is what dogs are smelling when they identify a person with cancer. Those are signals and we need to study them properly. We also emit other kinds of signals — we emit electromagnetic signals. People emit light. And of course we emit sound waves.
ALL of that needs to be studied as far as how does it influence other people in terms of causation of disease(?). But that’s prohibited because you’re not going to get a grant from NIH
