You are about to action:

Object being modified by the action

Do you want to proceed?

Share Video Link

https://www.bitchute.com/video/hOoTDdXz6nx1/

Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.

Embed Video HTML

Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.

Share to Social Media

Share to social media by clicking on the quick share links.

Report Content

Reason

Please select the most appropriate reason from the list provided.

Note: For a more detailed description of each reason, see our Community Guidelines.

Additional Comments

Please add any additonal comments that will help with the assessment of your request.

Note: Copyright claims must contain all the items specified within the Copyright Policy.

Email Submissions

We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.

Thank you for submitting your report

We will investigate and take the appropriate action.

Add to Playlist

Why all kinds of research made sense: debunking "starch was essential for the growth of our brains".

Next video playing soon

Click to cancel

Autoplay has been paused

Click to watch next video

First published at 20:29 UTC on May 24th, 2020.

Cassandra_of_Cyberland

Legion of Scientific Heresy

subscribers

Your platform for uncensored ideas. BitChute Premium.

BitChute Advertisement

Hello!
Today it may look like we are going on head on (again) against vegans and, more generally, about deception based propaganda. That misinformation/disinformation which is so concerning to people working for Google and Apple in developing artificial stupidity that may prevent freedom of speech? Unless if pertains to topics like the one we touch. Don't worry, they are not going to consider disinformation to go on and on about starch having been essential for the growth of human brains.

But no, what we want to talk is about the fact that all kinds of research, apparently useless from a practical point of view as they may look, can have the potential of debunking
some politically driven drivel. Also, how the last decade of publications in academia seem dangerous in terms of political agenda: we are going to use an article in Nature
from 2004 to give the killing blow to a "starch and therefore plants and reasons were necessary for the growth of the human brain to intelligent tool maker supah dupah".
But this is after we have used palaeobotanics, palaeontology and medicine to show the idea is actual crap.

Enjoy, like, share and subscribe!

P.S. We are still getting people subscribing and then unsubscribing. Hint: we are not woke in any way, shape or form. Continue at your peril and save yourselves the time
spent subscribing and unsubscribing. You are welcome!

Resources
Https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2015/08/10/starchy-carbs--not-a-paleo-diet--advanced-the-human-race.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pottery
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooking#History
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taro#History
https://science.howstuffworks.com/life/cellular-microscopic/fat-cell3.htm
This one is the only not-self-explaining: it is the one about primates not digging!
https://www.nature.com/articles/news041206-12
https://www.123dentist.com/how-your-oral-health-can-impact-your-overall-health/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat#Fatty_acids_and_human_health
We found the picture about the ancient wheats here:
https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2016/06/27/483278049/nothing-says-hip-like-ancient-wheat?t=1590322972167
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potato
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yam_(vegetable)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweet_potato#Origin