Click to copy, then share by pasting into your messages, comments, social media posts and websites.
Click to copy, then add into your webpages so users can view and engage with this video from your site.
Report Content
We also accept reports via email. Please see the Guidelines Enforcement Process for instructions on how to make a request via email.
Thank you for submitting your report
We will investigate and take the appropriate action.
Jim and Diane, WALK AND TALK, Jan 21, 2024, Degrelle’s Pope Ltr; Weber’s Quitting ‘Shoah” Fighting
*** Leon Degrelle’s Letter to Pope John Paul II, About Auschwitz (circa 1979)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3xpZf4MTHJMV/
*** Mark Weber
*** How Relevant is Holocaust Revisionism, Jan 7, 2009
https://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n1p-2_Faurisson.html
*** Follow Up (Feb 13, 2009): A Reply to Critics of My Essay on the Relevance of Holocaust Revisionism By Mark Weber Director, Institute for Historical Review
JEWISH INDEPENDENT (FORWARD)
Revisionist: It’s Time To Quit Shoah Fight by Nathaniel Popper January 16, 2009
https://forward.com/news/14953/revisionist-it-s-time-to-quit-shoah-fight-03176/
One of the primary leaders in the fight to question and delegitimize the Holocaust has proclaimed that fight to be a lost cause, sparking a furious debate among his cohorts. Mark Weber, a telegenic Californian, has served for 15 years as director of the Institute for Historical Review, which was founded in the late 1970s as a center for people dedicated to doubting and criticizing mainstream histories of the Holocaust. This month, however, Weber released an essay on the institute’s Web site, questioning whether this work has ever had any relevance. Weber argued that Holocaust revisionists are unlikely to have any success in convincing large numbers of people. “It’s been almost 30 years, and Holocaust revisionism has gotten almost no support in academic circles or society at large,” Weber told the Forward. “It’s gotten some support in Iran, or places like that, but as far as I know, there is no history department supporting writing by these folks.” The argument in Weber’s essay, “How Relevant Is Holocaust Revisionism?” might appear, at first glance, to be good news for the Jewish organizations that have fought against Holocaust revisionists. But in his essay, Weber calls for his movement to shift to a new mission, one more purely directed to fighting against “Jewish-Zionist power.”
*** From The Journal of Historical Review, January/February 2000 (Vol. 19, No. 1), pages 2-31. Impact and Future of Holocaust Revisionism by Robert Faurisson
https://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n1p-2_Faurisson.html
Robert Faurisson is Europe's foremost Holocaust revisionist scholar. Born in 1929, he was educated at the Paris Sorbonne, and served as a professor at the University of Lyon in France from 1974 until 1990. He was a specialist of text and document analysis. After years of private research and study, Dr. Faurisson first made public his skeptical views about the Holocaust extermination story in articles published in 1978 and 1979 in the French daily Le Monde. His writings on the Holocaust issue have appeared in several books and numerous scholarly articles, many of which have been published in this Journal. This essay, translated from the French by S. Mundi, is adapted from the introduction (dated December 3, 1998) to Écrits révisionnistes (1974-1998), a four-volume collection, published in 1999, of many of Faurisson's revisionist writings.
Category | News & Politics |
Sensitivity | Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over |
Warning - This video exceeds your sensitivity preference!
To dismiss this warning and continue to watch the video please click on the button below.
Note - Autoplay has been disabled for this video.