First published at 22:25 UTC on May 1st, 2020.
REMOVED BY YOUTUBE
When discussion of the law scares Youtube into removing a video YT DOES NOT not want you to SEE the TRUTH of the END RESULT.
Kate Shemrani, a nurse in the UK, discusses the UK Public Health Control of Infectious Disease Act of 198…
MORE
REMOVED BY YOUTUBE
When discussion of the law scares Youtube into removing a video YT DOES NOT not want you to SEE the TRUTH of the END RESULT.
Kate Shemrani, a nurse in the UK, discusses the UK Public Health Control of Infectious Disease Act of 1984 and what this act will end up meaning in the current planed epidemic scenario.
The changes Kate notes are of particular import so you will need to check what, if any changes, have been made in your country. That said, similar already totalitarian public health laws exist in most, if not all, western countries and probably the others as well. In the U.S. this is or was mostly left to the states but may have changed since I was learning about public health in the U.S. in in the 2007-2010 period. The laws arguably make sense from a dread contagious disease perspective where someone needed to be controlled (read up on “Typhoid Mary” if you want an example of someone who did need to be controlled) or where the person’s possessions were likely to be highly contaminated and dangerous. Even given all that, we understand how the C V is being framed and how the narrative is being told. So these public health laws, rarely used, may be a “color of the law” enabler of draconian totalitarian measures. That, IMO, is why Kate is pointing these things out as it relates to the UK version of the law.
Please see Kate’s YouTube channel for videos not yet banned, she provides much useful information:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC56RE1Tc9Y10_NfHOBnsboQ/videos
LESS