First published at 00:39 UTC on November 3rd, 2019.
Copied from https://www.bitchute.com/channel/ccrippled/
Being intact myself, I've never related to people who are intact who minimize how much radical circumcision removes and how dramatically it alters the penis. Possibly many intact men were…
MORE
Copied from https://www.bitchute.com/channel/ccrippled/
Being intact myself, I've never related to people who are intact who minimize how much radical circumcision removes and how dramatically it alters the penis. Possibly many intact men were prematurely retracted. That will stunt growth and alter healthy development since the foreskin needs to be fused to the glans while the penis is developing. Possibly those men are just trying to be polite and tolerant.
To the Jews watching this thinking you can identify non-Jewish men by dropping their pants and looking for a whole penis, you can't. Many Ashkenazis are intact. At this point in time, intact/mutilated provides no useful information about the Jew/Non-Jew identity of the man.
He's misguided calling the glans mucosal. Inner foreskin is mucosal while the glans in an intact penis is just a slick, eyeball-like surface.
He says morality is innate in every human being. I know for a fact there are many in human bodies without even the tiniest capacity for empathy, conscience, and morality.
He says this atrocity done to infants damages them for life not just physically but mentally and psychologically.
I would agree any adults who conspire to mutilate the genitals of any child ought to be cuffed and jailed.
In response to the comment below saying 99% of men support this atrocity, you must be referring to Americans who have this forced against their will at birth. Of course they don't want other men being intact when they have to live out their lives sexually crippled.
His rage is justified. Most victims bottle it up.
LESS